Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Christina L. Ting

dblp:205/3283 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0003-2871-8906ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Security and privacy · 1 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Network measurement and analytics · 100%
Network and information security
1 paper
Network security · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Coding theory · 50% Computational complexity · 50%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Network measurement and analytics
traffic classification
0.412019
Compression Analytics for Classification and Anomaly Detection Within Network Communication · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2019
Network security
traffic analysis
0.412019
Compression Analytics for Classification and Anomaly Detection Within Network Communication · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2019
Computational complexity › kolmogorov complexity
normalized compression distance
0.112019
Compression Analytics for Classification and Anomaly Detection Within Network Communication · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2019
Coding theory
source coding
0.112019
Compression Analytics for Classification and Anomaly Detection Within Network Communication · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

slice compression · 1.1normalized compression distance · 1.1compression analytics · 1.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Using Machine Learning to Predict Bilingual Language Proficiency from Reaction Time Priming Data
Laura E. Matzen, Christina L. Ting, Mallory C. Stites
CogSci2
2019 Generalized Boundary Detection Using Compression-based Analytics
abstract
We present a new method for boundary detection within sequential data using compression-based analytics. Our approach is to approximate the information distance between two adjacent sliding windows within the sequence. Large values in the distance metric are indicative of boundary locations. A new algorithm is developed, referred to as sliding information distance (SLID), that provides a fast, accurate, and robust approximation to the normalized information distance. A modified smoothed z-score algorithm is used to locate peaks in the distance metric, indicating boundary locations. A variety of data sources are considered, including text and audio, to demonstrate the efficacy of our approach.
Christina L. Ting, Richard V. Field Jr., Tu-Thach Quach, Travis L. Bauer
ICASSP1
2019 Reordering Genomic Sequences for Enhanced Classification via Compression Analytics
abstract
The full implications of sharing genomic information are still largely unknown. Understanding what attributes can be inferred from available information is therefore a critical part of genomic privacy and security. We show that compression analytics are successful at classifying, or inferring, unknown attributes of genomic sequences without the need for a predefined feature set and with very little training data. Compression analytics perform best when predictable elements within a sequence are local; however, long range dependencies are ubiquitous in the human genome. We therefore consider a variety of schemes to reorder genomic sequences so as to localize predictable elements and improve the performance of compression analytics. Compression analytics on both native and reordered sequences are shown to outperform more traditional, feature-based machine learning approaches.
Christina L. Ting, Renee Gooding, Richard V. Field Jr., Jacob Caswell
ICMLA1
2019 Compression Analytics for Classification and Anomaly Detection Within Network Communication
abstract
The flexibility of network communication within Internet protocols is fundamental to network function, yet this same flexibility permits the possibility of malicious use. In particular, malicious behavior can masquerade as benign traffic, thus evading systems designed to catch misuse of network resources. However, perfect imitation of benign traffic is difficult, meaning that small unintentional deviations from normal can occur. Identifying these deviations requires that the defenders know what features reveal malicious behavior. Herein, we present an application of compression-based analytics to network communication that can reduce the need for defenders to know a priori what features they need to examine. Motivating the approach is the idea that compression relies on the ability to discover and make use of predictable elements in information, thereby highlighting any deviations between expected and received content. We introduce a so-called “slice compression” score to identify malicious or anomalous communication in two ways. First, we apply normalized compression distances to classification problems and discuss methods for reducing the noise by excising application content (as opposed to protocol features) using slice compression. Second, we present a new technique for anomaly detection, referred to as slice compression for anomaly detection. A diverse collection of datasets are analyzed to illustrate the efficacy of the proposed approaches. While our focus is network communication, other types of data are also considered to illustrate the generality of the method.
Christina L. Ting, Richard V. Field Jr., Andrew Fisher 0001, Travis L. Bauer
IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur.1