Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Michael Lindsey
dblp:205/4293
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Learning theory · 48% Generative modeling · 22% Deep learning architectures and training · 16% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Learning theory
implicit bias |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent for Non-Homogeneous Deep Networks · ICML 2025 Large Stepsize Gradient Descent for Non-Homogeneous Two-Layer Networks: Margin Improvement and Fast Optimization · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › implicit bias
implicit bias of gradient descent |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent for Non-Homogeneous Deep Networks · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › gradient-based optimization
gradient descent |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Large Stepsize Gradient Descent for Non-Homogeneous Two-Layer Networks: Margin Improvement and Fast Optimization · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
margin maximization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Large Stepsize Gradient Descent for Non-Homogeneous Two-Layer Networks: Margin Improvement and Fast Optimization · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › generative model › continuous-time generative model
stochastic interpolants |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Multimarginal Generative Modeling with Stochastic Interpolants · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Multimarginal Generative Modeling with Stochastic Interpolants · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › training dynamics
two-layer neural network training |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Large Stepsize Gradient Descent for Non-Homogeneous Two-Layer Networks: Margin Improvement and Fast Optimization · NeurIPS 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
gradient descent · 1.6exponential loss · 0.9KKT conditions · 0.9stochastic interpolants · 0.8score matching · 0.8margin analysis · 0.8empirical risk minimization · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent for Non-Homogeneous Deep NetworksabstractWe establish the asymptotic implicit bias of gradient descent (GD) for generic non-homogeneous deep networks under exponential loss. Specifically, we characterize three key properties of GD iterates starting from a sufficiently small empirical risk, where the threshold is determined by a measure of the network's non-homogeneity. First, we show that a normalized margin induced by the GD iterates increases nearly monotonically. Second, we prove that while the norm of the GD iterates diverges to infinity, the iterates themselves converge in direction. Finally, we establish that this directional limit satisfies the Karush–Kuhn–Tucker (KKT) conditions of a margin maximization problem. Prior works on implicit bias have focused exclusively on homogeneous networks; in contrast, our results apply to a broad class of non-homogeneous networks satisfying a mild near-homogeneity condition. In particular, our results apply to networks with residual connections and non-homogeneous activation functions, thereby resolving an open problem posed byJi & Telgarsky (2020). Yuhang Cai, Kangjie Zhou, Jingfeng Wu, Song Mei, Michael Lindsey, Peter L. Bartlett |
ICML | 5 |
| 2024 | Multimarginal Generative Modeling with Stochastic InterpolantsabstractGiven a set of $K$ probability densities, we consider the multimarginal generative modeling problem of learning a joint distribution that recovers these densities as marginals. The structure of this joint distribution should identify multi-way correspondences among the prescribed marginals. We formalize an approach to this task within a generalization of the stochastic interpolant framework, leading to efficient learning algorithms built upon dynamical transport of measure. Our generative models are defined by velocity and score fields that can be characterized as the minimizers of simple quadratic objectives, and they are defined on a simplex that generalizes the time variable in the usual dynamical transport framework. The resulting transport on the simplex is influenced by all marginals, and we show that multi-way correspondences can be extracted. The identification of such correspondences has applications to style transfer, algorithmic fairness, and data decorruption. In addition, the multimarginal perspective enables an efficient algorithm for optimizing the dynamical transport cost in the ordinary two-marginal setting. We demonstrate these capacities with several numerical examples. Michael S. Albergo, Nicholas M. Boffi, Michael Lindsey, Eric Vanden-Eijnden |
ICLR | 3 |
| 2024 | Large Stepsize Gradient Descent for Non-Homogeneous Two-Layer Networks: Margin Improvement and Fast OptimizationabstractThe typical training of neural networks using large stepsize gradient descent (GD) under the logistic loss often involves two distinct phases, where the empirical risk oscillates in the first phase but decreases monotonically in the second phase. We investigate this phenomenon in two-layer networks that satisfy a near-homogeneity condition. We show that the second phase begins once the empirical risk falls below a certain threshold, dependent on the stepsize. Additionally, we show that the normalized margin grows nearly monotonically in the second phase, demonstrating an implicit bias of GD in training non-homogeneous predictors. If the dataset is linearly separable and the derivative of the activation function is bounded away from zero, we show that the average empirical risk decreases, implying that the first phase must stop in finite steps. Finally, we demonstrate that by choosing a suitably large stepsize, GD that undergoes this phase transition is more efficient than GD that monotonically decreases the risk. Our analysis applies to networks of any width, beyond the well-known neural tangent kernel and mean-field regimes. Yuhang Cai, Jingfeng Wu, Song Mei, Michael Lindsey, Peter L. Bartlett |
NeurIPS | 4 |