Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Damyana Gateva

dblp:205/8981 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Information extraction and text analysis · 100%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › lexical semantics › verb semantics
aspectual classification
0.112017
Classification of telicity using cross-linguistic annotation projection · EMNLP 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

cross-linguistic annotation projection · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 Classification of telicity using cross-linguistic annotation projection
abstract
This paper addresses the automatic recognition of telicity, an aspectual notion.A telic event includes a natural endpoint (she walked home), while an atelic event does not (she walked around).Recognizing this difference is a prerequisite for temporal natural language understanding.In English, this classification task is difficult, as telicity is a covert linguistic category.In contrast, in Slavic languages, aspect is part of a verb's meaning and even available in machine-readable dictionaries.Our contributions are as follows.We successfully leverage additional silver standard training data in the form of projected annotations from parallel English-Czech data as well as context information, improving automatic telicity classification for English significantly compared to previous work.We also create a new data set of English texts manually annotated with telicity.
Annemarie Friedrich, Damyana Gateva
EMNLP2