Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Salman Estyak

dblp:205/9445 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0002-0060-0885ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Performance modeling and evaluation · 70% Distributed systems · 15% Cloud and datacenter computing · 15%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Performance modeling and evaluation
benchmarking
0.912025
TraceScaler: A Framework for Scaling Load in Real-World Traces for System Evaluation · ACM Trans. Comput. Syst. 2025
Performance modeling and evaluation › simulation
trace replay
0.912025
TraceScaler: A Framework for Scaling Load in Real-World Traces for System Evaluation · ACM Trans. Comput. Syst. 2025
Performance modeling and evaluation
workload characterization
0.912025
TraceScaler: A Framework for Scaling Load in Real-World Traces for System Evaluation · ACM Trans. Comput. Syst. 2025
Distributed systems
fault tolerance
0.612022
Metastable Failures in the Wild · OSDI 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

trace upscaling · 0.9trace overlap · 0.9trace downscaling · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 TraceScaler: A Framework for Scaling Load in Real-World Traces for System Evaluation
abstract
Trace replay is a common approach for evaluating systems by rerunning historical traffic patterns, but it’s not always possible to find suitable real-world traces at the desired level of system load. To experiment with different loads, one needs to downscale a trace to decrease the load or upscale a trace to artificially increase the load. This article expands upon our work, TraceUpscaler [ 92 ], by considering the interaction of upscaling and downscaling. In addition to evaluating upscaling with traces collected from a subset of the cluster, we also evaluate upscaling with traces that were downscaled with the state-of-the-art downscaling tool, TraceSplitter [ 91 ], to demonstrate that the upscaling and downscaling techniques are compatible and do not introduce unexpected artifacts in the scaling. In addition to comparing against prior approaches, we develop a novel upscaling technique, TraceOverlap , based on the idea of overlapping different time periods in a trace, where we identify the most similar time periods to overlap. Our evaluation demonstrates that TraceUpscaler and TraceOverlap are both more accurate in maintaining latency characteristics than prior approaches, with TraceUpscaler matching the original trace latency more closely. Finally, we provide a unified framework, TraceScaler , that combines TraceUpscaler with TraceSplitter to provide experimenters a common tool for their trace scaling needs.
Sultan Mahmud Sajal, Salman Estyak, Rubaba Hasan, Timothy Zhu, Bhuvan Urgaonkar, Siddhartha Sen 0001
ACM Trans. Comput. Syst.2
2022 Metastable Failures in the Wild
Lexiang Huang, Matt Magnusson, Abishek Bangalore Muralikrishna, Salman Estyak, Rebecca Isaacs, Abutalib Aghayev, Timothy Zhu, Aleksey Charapko
OSDI4