Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Beliz Gunel
dblp:206/6726
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
2as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-2541-4157ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 1 first-author · 4 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Language models and text generation · 50% Representation and self-supervised learning · 25% Efficient and distributed learning · 9% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Machine learning and data management · 100% |
Topics — the 12 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › in-context learning
in-context reasoning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | PRISM: Efficient Long-Range Reasoning With Short-Context LLMs · EMNLP 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model reasoning
long-context reasoning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | PRISM: Efficient Long-Range Reasoning With Short-Context LLMs · EMNLP 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › prompting
prompt engineering |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | PRISM: Efficient Long-Range Reasoning With Short-Context LLMs · EMNLP 2025 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Supervised Contrastive Learning for Pre-trained Language Model Fine-tuning · ICLR 2021 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge acquisition › knowledge extraction
structured information extraction |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Glean: Structured Extractions from Templatic Documents · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2021 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › contrastive learning
supervised contrastive learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Supervised Contrastive Learning for Pre-trained Language Model Fine-tuning · ICLR 2021 |
Machine learning and data management
training data management |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Glean: Structured Extractions from Templatic Documents · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2021 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › representation geometry
mixed-curvature representation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Learning Mixed-Curvature Representations in Product Spaces · ICLR (Poster) 2019 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
network embedding |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Learning Mixed-Curvature Representations in Product Spaces · ICLR (Poster) 2019 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
inference efficiency |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | PRISM: Efficient Long-Range Reasoning With Short-Context LLMs · EMNLP 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
KV cache |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | PRISM: Efficient Long-Range Reasoning With Short-Context LLMs · EMNLP 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model › large language model adaptation
pre-trained language model fine-tuning |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Supervised Contrastive Learning for Pre-trained Language Model Fine-tuning · ICLR 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
machine learning · 1.0schema generation · 0.9in-context learning · 0.9riemannian geometry · 0.4product spaces · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | SUMIE: A Synthetic Benchmark for Incremental Entity SummarizationabstractNo existing dataset adequately tests how well language models can incrementally update entity summaries – a crucial ability as these models rapidly advance. The Incremental Entity Summarization (IES) task is vital for maintaining accurate, up-to-date knowledge. To address this, we introduce , a fully synthetic dataset designed to expose real-world IES challenges. This dataset addresses issues like incorrect entity association and incomplete information, capturing real-world complexity by generating diverse attributes, summaries, and unstructured paragraphs with 99% alignment accuracy between generated summaries and paragraphs. Extensive experiments demonstrate the dataset’s difficulty – state-of-the-art LLMs struggle to update summaries with an F1 higher than 80.4%. We will open-source the benchmark and the evaluation metrics to help the community make progress on IES tasks. Eunjeong Hwang, Yichao Zhou 0001, Beliz Gunel, James B. Wendt, Sandeep Tata |
COLING | 3 |
| 2025 | PRISM: Efficient Long-Range Reasoning With Short-Context LLMsabstractLong-range tasks demand reasoning over long inputs.However, existing solutions are limited, e.g., long-context models require large compute budgets, parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) needs training data, and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) entails complex task-specific designs.Though in-context approaches overcome many of these issues, methods with shortcontext LLMs are inefficient, trading context for processing more tokens.We introduce PRISM, a highly token-efficient in-context method based on structured schemas that outperforms baselines on diverse tasks with 4x shorter contexts.This approach produces concise outputs and efficiently leverages key-value (KV) caches to reduce costs by up to 54%.PRISM scales down to tiny contexts without increasing costs or sacrificing quality, and generalizes to new tasks with minimal effort by generating schemas from task descriptions. Dulhan Jayalath, James B. Wendt, Nicholas Monath, Sandeep Tata, Beliz Gunel |
EMNLP | 5 |
| 2022 | Scale-Equivariant Unrolled Neural Networks for Data-Efficient Accelerated MRI Reconstruction
Beliz Gunel, Arda Sahiner, Arjun D. Desai, Akshay Chaudhari, S. S. Vasanawala, Mert Pilanci, John M. Pauly |
MICCAI (6) | 1 |
| 2021 | Supervised Contrastive Learning for Pre-trained Language Model Fine-tuning
Beliz Gunel, Jingfei Du, Alexis Conneau, Veselin Stoyanov |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2021 | Self-training Improves Pre-training for Natural Language UnderstandingabstractJingfei Du, Edouard Grave, Beliz Gunel, Vishrav Chaudhary, Onur Celebi, Michael Auli, Veselin Stoyanov, Alexis Conneau. Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. 2021. Jingfei Du, Edouard Grave, Beliz Gunel, Vishrav Chaudhary, Onur Celebi, Michael Auli, Veselin Stoyanov, Alexis Conneau |
NAACL-HLT | 3 |
| 2021 | Glean: Structured Extractions from Templatic DocumentsabstractExtracting structured information from templatic documents is an important problem with the potential to automate many real-world business workflows such as payment, procurement, and payroll. The core challenge is that such documents can be laid out in virtually infinitely different ways. A good solution to this problem is one that generalizes well not only to known templates such as invoices from a known vendor, but also to unseen ones. We developed a system called Glean to tackle this problem. Given a target schema for a document type and some labeled documents of that type, Glean uses machine learning to automatically extract structured information from other documents of that type. In this paper, we describe the overall architecture of Glean, and discuss three key data management challenges : 1) managing the quality of ground truth data, 2) generating training data for the machine learning model using labeled documents, and 3) building tools that help a developer rapidly build and improve a model for a given document type. Through empirical studies on a real-world dataset, we show that these data management techniques allow us to train a model that is over 5 F1 points better than the exact same model architecture without the techniques we describe. We argue that for such information-extraction problems, designing abstractions that carefully manage the training data is at least as important as choosing a good model architecture. Sandeep Tata, Navneet Potti, James B. Wendt, Lauro Beltrão Costa, Marc Najork, Beliz Gunel |
Proc. VLDB Endow. | 6 |
| 2019 | Learning Mixed-Curvature Representations in Product Spaces
Albert Gu, Frederic Sala, Beliz Gunel, Christopher Ré |
ICLR (Poster) | 3 |