Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Beliz Gunel

dblp:206/6726 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
2as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-2541-4157ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 1 first-author · 4 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Language models and text generation · 50% Representation and self-supervised learning · 25% Efficient and distributed learning · 9%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Machine learning and data management · 100%

Topics — the 12 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › in-context learning
in-context reasoning
0.912025
PRISM: Efficient Long-Range Reasoning With Short-Context LLMs · EMNLP 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model reasoning
long-context reasoning
0.912025
PRISM: Efficient Long-Range Reasoning With Short-Context LLMs · EMNLP 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › prompting
prompt engineering
0.912025
PRISM: Efficient Long-Range Reasoning With Short-Context LLMs · EMNLP 2025
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning
0.512021
Supervised Contrastive Learning for Pre-trained Language Model Fine-tuning · ICLR 2021
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge acquisition › knowledge extraction
structured information extraction
0.512021
Glean: Structured Extractions from Templatic Documents · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2021
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › contrastive learning
supervised contrastive learning
0.512021
Supervised Contrastive Learning for Pre-trained Language Model Fine-tuning · ICLR 2021
Machine learning and data management
training data management
0.512021
Glean: Structured Extractions from Templatic Documents · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2021
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › representation geometry
mixed-curvature representation
0.412019
Learning Mixed-Curvature Representations in Product Spaces · ICLR (Poster) 2019
Machine learning › Graph learning
network embedding
0.412019
Learning Mixed-Curvature Representations in Product Spaces · ICLR (Poster) 2019
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
inference efficiency
0.312025
PRISM: Efficient Long-Range Reasoning With Short-Context LLMs · EMNLP 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
KV cache
0.312025
PRISM: Efficient Long-Range Reasoning With Short-Context LLMs · EMNLP 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model › large language model adaptation
pre-trained language model fine-tuning
0.112021
Supervised Contrastive Learning for Pre-trained Language Model Fine-tuning · ICLR 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

machine learning · 1.0schema generation · 0.9in-context learning · 0.9riemannian geometry · 0.4product spaces · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 SUMIE: A Synthetic Benchmark for Incremental Entity Summarization
abstract
No existing dataset adequately tests how well language models can incrementally update entity summaries – a crucial ability as these models rapidly advance. The Incremental Entity Summarization (IES) task is vital for maintaining accurate, up-to-date knowledge. To address this, we introduce , a fully synthetic dataset designed to expose real-world IES challenges. This dataset addresses issues like incorrect entity association and incomplete information, capturing real-world complexity by generating diverse attributes, summaries, and unstructured paragraphs with 99% alignment accuracy between generated summaries and paragraphs. Extensive experiments demonstrate the dataset’s difficulty – state-of-the-art LLMs struggle to update summaries with an F1 higher than 80.4%. We will open-source the benchmark and the evaluation metrics to help the community make progress on IES tasks.
Eunjeong Hwang, Yichao Zhou 0001, Beliz Gunel, James B. Wendt, Sandeep Tata
COLING3
2025 PRISM: Efficient Long-Range Reasoning With Short-Context LLMs
abstract
Long-range tasks demand reasoning over long inputs.However, existing solutions are limited, e.g., long-context models require large compute budgets, parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) needs training data, and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) entails complex task-specific designs.Though in-context approaches overcome many of these issues, methods with shortcontext LLMs are inefficient, trading context for processing more tokens.We introduce PRISM, a highly token-efficient in-context method based on structured schemas that outperforms baselines on diverse tasks with 4x shorter contexts.This approach produces concise outputs and efficiently leverages key-value (KV) caches to reduce costs by up to 54%.PRISM scales down to tiny contexts without increasing costs or sacrificing quality, and generalizes to new tasks with minimal effort by generating schemas from task descriptions.
Dulhan Jayalath, James B. Wendt, Nicholas Monath, Sandeep Tata, Beliz Gunel
EMNLP5
2022 Scale-Equivariant Unrolled Neural Networks for Data-Efficient Accelerated MRI Reconstruction
Beliz Gunel, Arda Sahiner, Arjun D. Desai, Akshay Chaudhari, S. S. Vasanawala, Mert Pilanci, John M. Pauly
MICCAI (6)1
2021 Supervised Contrastive Learning for Pre-trained Language Model Fine-tuning
Beliz Gunel, Jingfei Du, Alexis Conneau, Veselin Stoyanov
ICLR1
2021 Self-training Improves Pre-training for Natural Language Understanding
abstract
Jingfei Du, Edouard Grave, Beliz Gunel, Vishrav Chaudhary, Onur Celebi, Michael Auli, Veselin Stoyanov, Alexis Conneau. Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. 2021.
Jingfei Du, Edouard Grave, Beliz Gunel, Vishrav Chaudhary, Onur Celebi, Michael Auli, Veselin Stoyanov, Alexis Conneau
NAACL-HLT3
2021 Glean: Structured Extractions from Templatic Documents
abstract
Extracting structured information from templatic documents is an important problem with the potential to automate many real-world business workflows such as payment, procurement, and payroll. The core challenge is that such documents can be laid out in virtually infinitely different ways. A good solution to this problem is one that generalizes well not only to known templates such as invoices from a known vendor, but also to unseen ones. We developed a system called Glean to tackle this problem. Given a target schema for a document type and some labeled documents of that type, Glean uses machine learning to automatically extract structured information from other documents of that type. In this paper, we describe the overall architecture of Glean, and discuss three key data management challenges : 1) managing the quality of ground truth data, 2) generating training data for the machine learning model using labeled documents, and 3) building tools that help a developer rapidly build and improve a model for a given document type. Through empirical studies on a real-world dataset, we show that these data management techniques allow us to train a model that is over 5 F1 points better than the exact same model architecture without the techniques we describe. We argue that for such information-extraction problems, designing abstractions that carefully manage the training data is at least as important as choosing a good model architecture.
Sandeep Tata, Navneet Potti, James B. Wendt, Lauro Beltrão Costa, Marc Najork, Beliz Gunel
Proc. VLDB Endow.6
2019 Learning Mixed-Curvature Representations in Product Spaces
Albert Gu, Frederic Sala, Beliz Gunel, Christopher Ré
ICLR (Poster)3