Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Elad Venezian
dblp:206/6812
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0001-9785-3605ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Information extraction and text analysis · 33% Efficient and distributed learning · 29% Learning theory · 29% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Learning theory › model selection
base model selection |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Where to start? Analyzing the potential value of intermediate models · EMNLP 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
argument mining |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Automatic Argument Quality Assessment - New Datasets and Methods · EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) 2019 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › argument mining
argument quality assessment |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Automatic Argument Quality Assessment - New Datasets and Methods · EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) 2019 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
fine-tuning |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Where to start? Analyzing the potential value of intermediate models · EMNLP 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
multi-task learning · 0.7empirical analysis · 0.7distributed computation · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | ColD Fusion: Collaborative Descent for Distributed Multitask FinetuningabstractWe propose a new paradigm to continually evolve pretrained models, denoted ColD Fusion.It provides the benefits of multitask learning but leverages distributed computation with limited communication and eliminates the need for shared data.Consequentially, ColD Fusion can give rise to a synergistic loop, where finetuned models can be recycled to continually improve the pretrained model they are based upon.We show that ColD Fusion yields comparable benefits to multitask training by producing a model that (a) attains strong performance on all of the datasets it was trained on; and (b) is a better starting point for finetuning on unseen datasets.We show that ColD Fusion outperforms RoBERTa and even previous multitask models.Specifically, when training and testing on 35 diverse datasets, ColD Fusion-based model outperforms RoBERTa by 2.33 points on average without any changes to the architecture.1 Shachar Don-Yehiya, Elad Venezian, Colin Raffel, Noam Slonim, Leshem Choshen |
ACL (1) | 2 |
| 2023 | Where to start? Analyzing the potential value of intermediate modelsabstractPrevious studies observed that finetuned models may be better base models than the vanilla pretrained model.Such a model, finetuned on some source dataset, may provide a better starting point for a new finetuning process on a desired target dataset.Here, we perform a systematic analysis of this intertraining scheme, over a wide range of English classification tasks.Surprisingly, our analysis suggests that the potential intertraining gain can be analyzed independently for the target dataset under consideration, and for a base model being considered as a starting point.Hence, a performant model is generally strong, even if its training data was not aligned with the target dataset.Furthermore, we leverage our analysis to propose a practical and efficient approach to determine if and how to select a base model in real-world settings.Last, we release an updating ranking of best models in the HuggingFace hub per architecture. Leshem Choshen, Elad Venezian, Shachar Don-Yehiya, Noam Slonim, Yoav Katz |
EMNLP | 2 |
| 2019 | Automatic Argument Quality Assessment - New Datasets and MethodsabstractAssaf Toledo, Shai Gretz, Edo Cohen-Karlik, Roni Friedman, Elad Venezian, Dan Lahav, Michal Jacovi, Ranit Aharonov, Noam Slonim. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP). 2019. Assaf Toledo, Shai Gretz, Edo Cohen-Karlik, Roni Friedman, Elad Venezian, Dan Lahav, Michal Jacovi, Ranit Aharonov, Noam Slonim |
EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) | 5 |
| 2018 | A Recorded Debating Dataset
Shachar Mirkin, Michal Jacovi, Tamar Lavee, Hong-Kwang Jeff Kuo, Samuel Thomas 0001, Leslie Sager, Lili Kotlerman, Elad Venezian, Noam Slonim |
LREC | 8 |