Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Elad Venezian

dblp:206/6812 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0001-9785-3605ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Information extraction and text analysis · 33% Efficient and distributed learning · 29% Learning theory · 29%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Learning theory › model selection
base model selection
0.712023
Where to start? Analyzing the potential value of intermediate models · EMNLP 2023
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
argument mining
0.412019
Automatic Argument Quality Assessment - New Datasets and Methods · EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) 2019
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › argument mining
argument quality assessment
0.412019
Automatic Argument Quality Assessment - New Datasets and Methods · EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) 2019
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
fine-tuning
0.212023
Where to start? Analyzing the potential value of intermediate models · EMNLP 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

multi-task learning · 0.7empirical analysis · 0.7distributed computation · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 ColD Fusion: Collaborative Descent for Distributed Multitask Finetuning
abstract
We propose a new paradigm to continually evolve pretrained models, denoted ColD Fusion.It provides the benefits of multitask learning but leverages distributed computation with limited communication and eliminates the need for shared data.Consequentially, ColD Fusion can give rise to a synergistic loop, where finetuned models can be recycled to continually improve the pretrained model they are based upon.We show that ColD Fusion yields comparable benefits to multitask training by producing a model that (a) attains strong performance on all of the datasets it was trained on; and (b) is a better starting point for finetuning on unseen datasets.We show that ColD Fusion outperforms RoBERTa and even previous multitask models.Specifically, when training and testing on 35 diverse datasets, ColD Fusion-based model outperforms RoBERTa by 2.33 points on average without any changes to the architecture.1
Shachar Don-Yehiya, Elad Venezian, Colin Raffel, Noam Slonim, Leshem Choshen
ACL (1)2
2023 Where to start? Analyzing the potential value of intermediate models
abstract
Previous studies observed that finetuned models may be better base models than the vanilla pretrained model.Such a model, finetuned on some source dataset, may provide a better starting point for a new finetuning process on a desired target dataset.Here, we perform a systematic analysis of this intertraining scheme, over a wide range of English classification tasks.Surprisingly, our analysis suggests that the potential intertraining gain can be analyzed independently for the target dataset under consideration, and for a base model being considered as a starting point.Hence, a performant model is generally strong, even if its training data was not aligned with the target dataset.Furthermore, we leverage our analysis to propose a practical and efficient approach to determine if and how to select a base model in real-world settings.Last, we release an updating ranking of best models in the HuggingFace hub per architecture.
Leshem Choshen, Elad Venezian, Shachar Don-Yehiya, Noam Slonim, Yoav Katz
EMNLP2
2019 Automatic Argument Quality Assessment - New Datasets and Methods
abstract
Assaf Toledo, Shai Gretz, Edo Cohen-Karlik, Roni Friedman, Elad Venezian, Dan Lahav, Michal Jacovi, Ranit Aharonov, Noam Slonim. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP). 2019.
Assaf Toledo, Shai Gretz, Edo Cohen-Karlik, Roni Friedman, Elad Venezian, Dan Lahav, Michal Jacovi, Ranit Aharonov, Noam Slonim
EMNLP/IJCNLP (1)5
2018 A Recorded Debating Dataset
Shachar Mirkin, Michal Jacovi, Tamar Lavee, Hong-Kwang Jeff Kuo, Samuel Thomas 0001, Leslie Sager, Lili Kotlerman, Elad Venezian, Noam Slonim
LREC8