Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Keunseo Kim

dblp:206/8672 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 50% Learning theory · 28% Trustworthy machine learning · 22%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › deep probabilistic models › bayesian deep learning
bayesian neural networks
0.712023
Inverse-Reference Priors for Fisher Regularization of Bayesian Neural Networks · AAAI 2023
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization
0.712023
Inverse-Reference Priors for Fisher Regularization of Bayesian Neural Networks · AAAI 2023
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference
bayesian hypothesis testing
0.512021
Locally Most Powerful Bayesian Test for Out-of-Distribution Detection using Deep Generative Models · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
out-of-distribution detection
0.512021
Locally Most Powerful Bayesian Test for Out-of-Distribution Detection using Deep Generative Models · NeurIPS 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

inverse-reference prior · 0.7fisher information matrix · 0.7locally most powerful test · 0.5bayes factor · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Inverse-Reference Priors for Fisher Regularization of Bayesian Neural Networks
abstract
Recent studies have shown that the generalization ability of deep neural networks (DNNs) is closely related to the Fisher information matrix (FIM) calculated during the early training phase. Several methods have been proposed to regularize the FIM for increased generalization of DNNs. However, they cannot be used directly for Bayesian neural networks (BNNs) because the variable parameters of BNNs make it difficult to calculate the FIM. To address this problem, we achieve regularization of the FIM of BNNs by specifying a new suitable prior distribution called the inverse-reference (IR) prior. To regularize the FIM, the IR prior is derived as the inverse of the reference prior that imposes minimal prior knowledge on the parameters and maximizes the trace of the FIM. We demonstrate that the IR prior can enhance the generalization ability of BNNs for large-scale data over previously used priors while providing adequate uncertainty quantifications using various benchmark image datasets and BNN structures.
Keunseo Kim, Eun-Yeol Ma, Jeongman Choi, Heeyoung Kim
AAAI1
2021 Locally Most Powerful Bayesian Test for Out-of-Distribution Detection using Deep Generative Models
abstract
Several out-of-distribution (OOD) detection scores have been recently proposed for deep generative models because the direct use of the likelihood threshold for OOD detection has been shown to be problematic. In this paper, we propose a new OOD score based on a Bayesian hypothesis test called the locally most powerful Bayesian test (LMPBT). The LMPBT is locally most powerful in that the alternative hypothesis (the representative parameter for the OOD sample) is specified to maximize the probability that the Bayes factor exceeds the evidence threshold in favor of the alternative hypothesis provided that the parameter specified under the alternative hypothesis is in the neighborhood of the parameter specified under the null hypothesis. That is, under this neighborhood parameter condition, the test with the proposed alternative hypothesis maximizes the probability of correct detection of OOD samples. We also propose numerical strategies for more efficient and reliable computation of the LMPBT for practical application to deep generative models. Evaluations conducted of the OOD detection performance of the LMPBT on various benchmark datasets demonstrate its superior performance over existing OOD detection methods.
Keunseo Kim, Juncheol Shin, Heeyoung Kim
NeurIPS1