Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Pratyush Agarwal

dblp:206/9608 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-3592-3564ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Security and privacy · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%
Network and information security
1 paper
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Program verification · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Mathematical optimization › sequential decision making
markov decision processes
0.912025
An Improved Lower Bound on the Length of Locally-Improving Policy Sequences in MDPs with Large Action Sets · ICAPS 2025
Mathematical optimization › sequential decision making › markov decision processes
policy iteration
0.912025
An Improved Lower Bound on the Length of Locally-Improving Policy Sequences in MDPs with Large Action Sets · ICAPS 2025
Program verification › model checking
stateless model checking
0.512021
Stateless Model Checking Under a Reads-Value-From Equivalence · CAV (1) 2021
Mathematical optimization
linear programming
0.312025
An Improved Lower Bound on the Length of Locally-Improving Policy Sequences in MDPs with Large Action Sets · ICAPS 2025
Mathematical optimization › linear programming
simplex method
0.312025
An Improved Lower Bound on the Length of Locally-Improving Policy Sequences in MDPs with Large Action Sets · ICAPS 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

lower bound construction · 0.9spectral analysis · 0.6stateless model checking · 0.5reads-value-from partitioning · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 An Improved Lower Bound on the Length of Locally-Improving Policy Sequences in MDPs with Large Action Sets
abstract
Popular algorithms to solve Markov Decision Problems (MDPs) include policy iteration and the Simplex method (executed on an induced linear program). Each run of these algorithms can be associated with a sequence of "locally-improving" policies for the input MDP. For integers n >= 2, k >= 2, let f(n, k) denote the longest possible sequence of locally-improving policies for any MDP with n states and k actions per state. An alternative view of f(n, k) is as a descriptive structural property of the policy space of MDPs: it is the largest possible "c-height" in an induced "LP-digraph" of any n-state, k-action MDP. How large can f(n, k) be? A trivial upper bound on f(n, k) is the total number of (Markovian, deterministic) policies, which is k^{n}. A construction from Melekopoglou and Condon (1994) shows that f(n, 2) = 2^{n}, implying that the trivial upper bound is tight for k = 2. For k >= 3, the tightest lower bound on f(n, k) in the current literature is only Omega(k^{n / 2}) (Ashutosh et al., 2020). In this paper, we propose a family of MDPs to show a lower bound of Omega( (floor(k / 2) )^{n}) on f(n, k)---giving a exponential-in-n tightening for each k >= 6. Our investigation brings out technical challenges that do not arise for k = 2. Our result still leaves open the important question of whether f(n, k) is indeed k^{n} for n >= 2, k >= 2. We furnish an affirmative answer for the special case of n = 2, k >= 2.
Pratyush Agarwal, Mulinti Shaik Wajid, Shivaram Kalyanakrishnan
ICAPS1
2022 Secure Non-interactive Reduction and Spectral Analysis of Correlations
Pratyush Agarwal, Varun Narayanan, Shreya Pathak, Manoj Prabhakaran 0001, Vinod M. Prabhakaran, Mohammad Ali Rehan
EUROCRYPT (3)1
2021 Stateless Model Checking Under a Reads-Value-From Equivalence
abstract
Abstract Stateless model checking (SMC) is one of the standard approaches to the verification of concurrent programs. As scheduling non-determinism creates exponentially large spaces of thread interleavings, SMC attempts to partition this space into equivalence classes and explore only a few representatives from each class. The efficiency of this approach depends on two factors: (a) the coarseness of the partitioning, and (b) the time to generate representatives in each class. For this reason, the search for coarse partitionings that are efficiently explorable is an active research challenge. In this work we present $${\text {RVF-SMC}}$$ RVF-SMC , a new SMC algorithm that uses a novelreads-value-from (RVF)partitioning. Intuitively, two interleavings are deemed equivalent if they agree on the value obtained in each read event, and read events induce consistent causal orderings between them. The RVF partitioning is provably coarser than recent approaches based on Mazurkiewicz and “reads-from” partitionings. Our experimental evaluation reveals that RVF is quite often a very effective equivalence, as the underlying partitioning is exponentially coarser than other approaches. Moreover, $${\text {RVF-SMC}}$$ RVF-SMC generates representatives very efficiently, as the reduction in the partitioning is often met with significant speed-ups in the model checking task.
Pratyush Agarwal, Krishnendu Chatterjee, Shreya Pathak, Andreas Pavlogiannis, Viktor Toman
CAV (1)1