Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Sumit Sati

dblp:207/1845 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Cloud and datacenter computing · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Operating systems · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Operating systems › virtualization
containers
0.312017
My VM is Lighter (and Safer) than your Container · SOSP 2017
Operating systems › system security › operating system security › protection mechanism › isolation
container isolation
0.312017
My VM is Lighter (and Safer) than your Container · SOSP 2017
Cloud and datacenter computing
virtualization
0.312017
My VM is Lighter (and Safer) than your Container · SOSP 2017
Cloud and datacenter computing › virtualization › virtualization security
virtual machine isolation
0.312017
My VM is Lighter (and Safer) than your Container · SOSP 2017
Cloud and datacenter computing › virtualization
lightweight virtualization
0.112017
My VM is Lighter (and Safer) than your Container · SOSP 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

isolation analysis · 0.6VM toolstack optimization · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 My VM is Lighter (and Safer) than your Container
abstract
Containers are in great demand because they are lightweight when compared to virtual machines. On the downside, containers offer weaker isolation than VMs, to the point where people run containers in virtual machines to achieve proper isolation. In this paper, we examine whether there is indeed a strict tradeoff between isolation (VMs) and efficiency (containers). We find that VMs can be as nimble as containers, as long as they are small and the toolstack is fast enough.
Filipe Manco, Costin Lupu, Florian Schmidt 0002, Jose Mendes, Simon Kuenzer, Sumit Sati, Kenichi Yasukata, Costin Raiciu, Felipe Huici
SOSP6