EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Dylan Johnson
dblp:207/1848
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Program verification · 91% Operating systems · 9% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Program verification
functional correctness |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Hyperkernel: Push-Button Verification of an OS Kernel · SOSP 2017 |
Program verification › system verification
kernel verification |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Hyperkernel: Push-Button Verification of an OS Kernel · SOSP 2017 |
Program verification › proof assistants
proof automation |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Hyperkernel: Push-Button Verification of an OS Kernel · SOSP 2017 |
Operating systems › kernel
kernel design |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | Hyperkernel: Push-Button Verification of an OS Kernel · SOSP 2017 |
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | Hyperkernel: Push-Button Verification of an OS KernelabstractThis paper describes an approach to designing, implementing, and formally verifying the functional correctness of an OS kernel, named Hyperkernel, with a high degree of proof automation and low proof burden. We base the design of Hyperkernel's interface on xv6, a Unix-like teaching operating system. Hyperkernel introduces three key ideas to achieve proof automation: it finitizes the kernel interface to avoid unbounded loops or recursion; it separates kernel and user address spaces to simplify reasoning about virtual memory; and it performs verification at the LLVM intermediate representation level to avoid modeling complicated C semantics. Luke Nelson, Helgi Sigurbjarnarson, Kaiyuan Zhang 0001, Dylan Johnson, James Bornholt, Emina Torlak, Xi Wang 0005 |
SOSP | 4 |