Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Qiankun Fu
dblp:207/3370
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Information extraction and text analysis · 51% Image recognition and object detection · 19% Language models and text generation · 15% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
semantic parsing |
0.6 | 2 | 2021 | DRTS Parsing with Structure-Aware Encoding and Decoding · ACL 2020 End-to-End AMR Corefencence Resolution · ACL/IJCNLP (1) 2021 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
coreference resolution |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | End-to-End AMR Corefencence Resolution · ACL/IJCNLP (1) 2021 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › semantic parsing
discourse representation parsing |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | DRTS Parsing with Structure-Aware Encoding and Decoding · ACL 2020 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Adaptive Class Preserving Representation for Image Classification · CVPR 2017 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › image classification
representation-based classification |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Adaptive Class Preserving Representation for Image Classification · CVPR 2017 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › semantic representation
abstract meaning representation |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | End-to-End AMR Corefencence Resolution · ACL/IJCNLP (1) 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
end-to-end model · 0.5sequence-to-sequence model · 0.4graph attention network · 0.4sparse representation · 0.3group lasso · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | End-to-End AMR Corefencence ResolutionabstractQiankun Fu, Linfeng Song, Wenyu Du, Yue Zhang. Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2021. Qiankun Fu, Linfeng Song, Wenyu Du, Yue Zhang 0004 |
ACL/IJCNLP (1) | 1 |
| 2020 | DRTS Parsing with Structure-Aware Encoding and DecodingabstractDiscourse representation tree structure (DRTS) parsing is a novel semantic parsing task which has been concerned most recently.State-of-the-art performance can be achieved by a neural sequence-to-sequence model, treating the tree construction as an incremental sequence generation problem.Structural information such as input syntax and the intermediate skeleton of the partial output has been ignored in the model, which could be potentially useful for the DRTS parsing.In this work, we propose a structural-aware model at both the encoder and decoder phase to integrate the structural information, where graph attention network (GAT) is exploited for effectively modeling.Experimental results on a benchmark dataset show that our proposed model is effective and can obtain the best performance in the literature. Qiankun Fu, Yue Zhang 0004, Jiangming Liu, Meishan Zhang |
ACL | 1 |
| 2017 | Adaptive Class Preserving Representation for Image ClassificationabstractIn linear representation-based image classification, an unlabeled sample is represented by the entire training set. To obtain a stable and discriminative solution, regularization on the vector of representation coefficients is necessary. For example, the representation in sparse representation-based classification (SRC) uses L1 norm penalty as regularization, which is equal to lasso. However, lasso overemphasizes the role of sparseness while ignoring the inherent structure among samples belonging to a same class. Many recent developed representation classifications have adopted lasso-type regressions to improve the performance. In this paper, we propose the adaptive class preserving representation for classification (ACPRC). Our method is related to group lasso based classification but different in two key points: When training samples in a class are uncorrelated, ACPRC turns into SRC, when samples in a class are highly correlated, it obtains similar result as group lasso. The superiority of ACPRC over other state-of-the-art regularization techniques including lasso, group lasso, sparse group lasso, etc. are evaluated by extensive experiments. Jian-Xun Mi, Qiankun Fu, Weisheng Li 0001 |
CVPR | 2 |