Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Abhirut Gupta

dblp:207/6462 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Machine translation · 44% Information extraction and text analysis · 32% Speech recognition and synthesis · 19%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
multilingual NLP
0.712023
Bi-Phone: Modeling Inter Language Phonetic Influences in Text · ACL (1) 2023
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis
phonetic modeling
0.712023
Bi-Phone: Modeling Inter Language Phonetic Influences in Text · ACL (1) 2023
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › monolingual data augmentation
back-translation
0.512021
HintedBT: Augmenting Back-Translation with Quality and Transliteration Hints · EMNLP (1) 2021
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
low-resource machine translation
0.512021
HintedBT: Augmenting Back-Translation with Quality and Transliteration Hints · EMNLP (1) 2021
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
neural machine translation
0.512021
HintedBT: Augmenting Back-Translation with Quality and Transliteration Hints · EMNLP (1) 2021
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
text segmentation
0.412020
Improving Segmentation for Technical Support Problems · ACL 2020
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
data augmentation
0.112021
HintedBT: Augmenting Back-Translation with Quality and Transliteration Hints · EMNLP (1) 2021
Information retrieval › question answering
answer extraction
0.112020
Improving Segmentation for Technical Support Problems · ACL 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sequence labelling · 0.9multi-model ensemble · 0.9contextual embeddings · 0.9transliteration · 0.7phonetic influence modeling · 0.7transliteration hints · 0.5quality hints · 0.5back-translation · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Bi-Phone: Modeling Inter Language Phonetic Influences in Text
abstract
Abhirut Gupta, Ananya B. Sai, Richard Sproat, Yuri Vasilevski, James Ren, Ambarish Jash, Sukhdeep Sodhi, Aravindan Raghuveer. Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2023.
Abhirut Gupta, Ananya Sai, Richard Sproat, Yuri Vasilevski, James S. Ren, Ambarish Jash, Sukhdeep S. Sodhi, Aravindan Raghuveer
ACL (1)1
2021 HintedBT: Augmenting Back-Translation with Quality and Transliteration Hints
abstract
Back-translation (BT) of target monolingual corpora is a widely used data augmentation strategy for neural machine translation (NMT), especially for low-resource language pairs.To improve effectiveness of the available BT data, we introduce HintedBT-a family of techniques which provides hints (through tags) to the encoder and decoder.First, we propose a novel method of using both high and low quality BT data by providing hints (as source tags on the encoder) to the model about the quality of each source-target pair.We don't filter out low quality data but instead show that these hints enable the model to learn effectively from noisy data.Second, we address the problem of predicting whether a source token needs to be translated or transliterated to the target language, which is common in crossscript translation tasks (i.e., where source and target do not share the written script).For such cases, we propose training the model with additional hints (as target tags on the decoder) that provide information about the operation required on the source (translation or both translation and transliteration).We conduct experiments and detailed analyses on standard WMT benchmarks for three crossscript low/medium-resource language pairs: {Hindi,Gujarati,Tamil}→English.Our methods compare favorably with five strong and well established baselines.We show that using these hints, both separately and together, significantly improves translation quality and leads to state-of-the-art performance in all three language pairs in corresponding bilingual settings.
Sahana Ramnath, Melvin Johnson, Abhirut Gupta, Aravindan Raghuveer
EMNLP (1)3
2021 Training Data Augmentation for Code-Mixed Translation
abstract
Machine translation of user-generated codemixed inputs to English is of crucial importance in applications like web search and targeted advertising.We address the scarcity of parallel training data for training such models by designing a strategy of converting existing non-code-mixed parallel data sources to codemixed parallel data.We present an mBERT based procedure whose core learnable component is a ternary sequence labeling model, that can be trained with a limited code-mixed corpus alone.We show a 5.8 point increase in BLEU on heavily code-mixed sentences by training a translation model using our data augmentation strategy on an Hindi-English codemixed translation task.
Abhirut Gupta, Aditya Vavre, Sunita Sarawagi
NAACL-HLT1
2020 Improving Segmentation for Technical Support Problems
abstract
Technical support problems are often long and complex.They typically contain user descriptions of the problem, the setup, and steps for attempted resolution.Often they also contain various non-natural language text elements like outputs of commands, snippets of code, error messages or stack traces.These elements contain potentially crucial information for problem resolution.However, they cannot be correctly parsed by tools designed for natural language.In this paper, we address the problem of segmentation for technical support questions.We formulate the problem as a sequence labelling task, and study the performance of state of the art approaches.We compare this against an intuitive contextual sentence-level classification baseline, and a state of the art supervised text-segmentation approach.We also introduce a novel component of combining contextual embeddings from multiple language models pre-trained on different data sources, which achieves a marked improvement over using embeddings from a single pre-trained language model.Finally, we also demonstrate the usefulness of such segmentation with improvements on the downstream task of answer retrieval.
Kushal Chauhan, Abhirut Gupta
ACL2
2018 Semantic Parsing for Technical Support Questions
abstract
Technical support problems are very complex. In contrast to regular web queries (that contain few keywords) or factoid questions (which are a few sentences), these problems usually include attributes like a detailed description of what is failing (symptom), steps taken in an effort to remediate the failure (activity), and sometimes a specific request or ask (intent). Automating support is the task of automatically providing answers to these problems given a corpus of solution documents. Traditional approaches to this task rely on information retrieval and are keyword based; looking for keyword overlap between the question and solution documents and ignoring these attributes. We present an approach for semantic parsing of technical questions that uses grammatical structure to extract these attributes as a baseline, and a CRF based model that can improve performance considerably in the presence of annotated data for training. We also demonstrate that combined with reasoning, these attributes help outperform retrieval baselines.
Abhirut Gupta, Anupama Ray, Gargi Dasgupta, Gautam Singh, Pooja Aggarwal, Prateeti Mohapatra
COLING1
2018 Domain Knowledge Driven Key Term Extraction for IT Services
Prateeti Mohapatra, Yu Deng 0004, Abhirut Gupta, Gargi Dasgupta, Amit M. Paradkar, Ruchi Mahindru, Daniela Rosu 0001, Shu Tao, Pooja Aggarwal
ICSOC3