Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Akshaya Mani

dblp:207/6571 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
3as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0003-4423-9614ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 4 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Computer networks · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
3 papers
Network security · 48% Privacy and data protection · 42% Cryptographic protocols and secure computation · 10%
Computer networks
1 paper
Network measurement and analytics · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Network security
anonymity networks
0.622018
Understanding Tor Usage with Privacy-Preserving Measurement · Internet Measurement Conference 2018
HisTorε: Differentially Private and Robust Statistics Collection for Tor · NDSS 2017
Network security › anonymity networks
tor
0.622018
Understanding Tor Usage with Privacy-Preserving Measurement · Internet Measurement Conference 2018
HisTorε: Differentially Private and Robust Statistics Collection for Tor · NDSS 2017
Privacy and data protection › privacy-preserving data analysis
privacy-preserving measurement
0.622017
HisTorε: Differentially Private and Robust Statistics Collection for Tor · NDSS 2017
Distributed Measurement with Private Set-Union Cardinality · CCS 2017
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy
0.312017
HisTorε: Differentially Private and Robust Statistics Collection for Tor · NDSS 2017
Privacy and data protection › data aggregation
distributed cardinality estimation
0.312017
Distributed Measurement with Private Set-Union Cardinality · CCS 2017
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
secure aggregation
0.312017
Distributed Measurement with Private Set-Union Cardinality · CCS 2017
Network security › anonymity networks
traffic analysis resistance
0.112018
Understanding Tor Usage with Privacy-Preserving Measurement · Internet Measurement Conference 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

privacy-preserving measurement · 0.7differential privacy · 0.6universal composability · 0.3secure multiparty computation · 0.3robust statistics · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Accountable Private Set Cardinality for Distributed Measurement
abstract
We introduce cryptographic protocols for securely and efficiently computing the cardinality of set union and set intersection. Our private set-cardinality protocols ( PSC ) are designed for the setting in which a large set of parties in a distributed system makes observations, and a small set of parties with more resources and higher reliability aggregates the observations. PSC allows for secure and useful statistics gathering in privacy-preserving distributed systems. For example, it allows operators of anonymity networks such as Tor to securely answer the questions: How many unique users are using the network? and How many hidden services are being accessed? We prove the correctness and security of PSC in the Universal Composability framework against an active adversary that compromises all but one of the aggregating parties. Although successful output cannot be guaranteed in this setting, PSC either succeeds or terminates with an abort, and we furthermore make the adversary accountable for causing an abort by blaming at least one malicious party. We also show that PSC prevents adaptive corruption of the data parties from revealing past observations, which prevents them from being victims of targeted compromise, and we ensure safe measurements by making outputs differentially private. We present a proof-of-concept implementation of PSC and use it to demonstrate that PSC operates with low computational overhead and reasonable bandwidth. It can count tens of thousands of unique observations from tens to hundreds of data-collecting parties while completing within hours. PSC is thus suitable for daily measurements in a distributed system.
Ellis Fenske, Akshaya Mani, Aaron Johnson 0001, Micah Sherr
ACM Trans. Priv. Secur.2
2018 An Extensive Evaluation of the Internet's Open Proxies
abstract
Open proxies forward traffic on behalf of any Internet user. Listed on open proxy aggregator sites, they are often used to bypass geographic region restrictions or circumvent censorship. Open proxies sometimes also provide a weak form of anonymity by concealing the requestor's IP address.
Akshaya Mani, Tavish Vaidya, David Dworken, Micah Sherr
ACSAC1
2018 Understanding Tor Usage with Privacy-Preserving Measurement
Akshaya Mani, T. Wilson-Brown, Rob Jansen, Aaron Johnson 0001, Micah Sherr
Internet Measurement Conference1
2017 Distributed Measurement with Private Set-Union Cardinality
abstract
This paper introduces a cryptographic protocol for efficiently aggregating a count of unique items across a set of data parties privately - that is, without exposing any information other than the count. Our protocol allows for more secure and useful statistics gathering in privacy-preserving distributed systems such as anonymity networks; for example, it allows operators of anonymity networks such as Tor to securely answer the questions: how many unique users are using the distributed service? and how many hidden services are being accessed?. We formally prove the correctness and security of our protocol in the Universal Composability framework against an active adversary that compromises all but one of the aggregation parties. We also show that the protocol provides security against adaptive corruption of the data parties, which prevents them from being victims of targeted compromise. To ensure safe measurements, we also show how the output can satisfy differential privacy.
Ellis Fenske, Akshaya Mani, Aaron Johnson 0001, Micah Sherr
CCS2
2017 HisTorε: Differentially Private and Robust Statistics Collection for Tor
Akshaya Mani, Micah Sherr
NDSS1