Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Alvin Wan

dblp:207/7523 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
9ranked-venue papers
3as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-2625-5899ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 9 · 3 first-author · 6 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 5 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
8 papers
Efficient and distributed learning · 40% Deep learning architectures and training · 23% Segmentation and scene understanding · 16%
Network and information security
1 paper
Security and privacy of machine learning · 100%

Topics — the 23 heaviest of 24, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression
1.942023
UPSCALE: Unconstrained Channel Pruning · ICML 2023
FBNetV3: Joint Architecture-Recipe Search Using Predictor Pretraining · CVPR 2021
FBNetV2: Differentiable Neural Architecture Search for Spatial and Channel Dimensions · CVPR 2020
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › transformer
vision transformer
1.222023
AutoFocusFormer: Image Segmentation off the Grid · CVPR 2023
Visual Transformers: Where Do Transformers Really Belong in Vision Models? · ICCV 2021
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › automated machine learning
neural architecture search
0.922021
FBNetV3: Joint Architecture-Recipe Search Using Predictor Pretraining · CVPR 2021
FBNetV2: Differentiable Neural Architecture Search for Spatial and Channel Dimensions · CVPR 2020
Security and privacy of machine learning › large language model safety
jailbreak defense
0.912025
Representation Bending for Large Language Model Safety · ACL (1) 2025
Security and privacy of machine learning
large language model safety
0.912025
Representation Bending for Large Language Model Safety · ACL (1) 2025
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
semantic segmentation
0.822021
Visual Transformers: Where Do Transformers Really Belong in Vision Models? · ICCV 2021
SqueezeSeg: Convolutional Neural Nets with Recurrent CRF for Real-Time Road-Object Segmentation from 3D LiDAR Point Cloud · ICRA 2018
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › pruning › structured pruning
channel pruning
0.712023
UPSCALE: Unconstrained Channel Pruning · ICML 2023
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
image segmentation
0.712023
AutoFocusFormer: Image Segmentation off the Grid · CVPR 2023
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › inference acceleration
inference latency reduction
0.712023
UPSCALE: Unconstrained Channel Pruning · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › attention mechanism
local attention
0.712023
AutoFocusFormer: Image Segmentation off the Grid · CVPR 2023
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification
0.622021
Visual Transformers: Where Do Transformers Really Belong in Vision Models? · ICCV 2021
Shift: A Zero FLOP, Zero Parameter Alternative to Spatial Convolutions · CVPR 2018
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › explainable AI
interpretable neural network
0.512021
NBDT: Neural-Backed Decision Tree · ICLR 2021
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
lightweight neural network
0.512021
FBNetV3: Joint Architecture-Recipe Search Using Predictor Pretraining · CVPR 2021
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › convolutional neural network
convolutional neural network architecture
0.312018
Shift: A Zero FLOP, Zero Parameter Alternative to Spatial Convolutions · CVPR 2018
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › efficient deep learning
efficient convolution
0.312018
Shift: A Zero FLOP, Zero Parameter Alternative to Spatial Convolutions · CVPR 2018
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
instance segmentation
0.312018
SqueezeSeg: Convolutional Neural Nets with Recurrent CRF for Real-Time Road-Object Segmentation from 3D LiDAR Point Cloud · ICRA 2018
Computer vision › 3D vision › point cloud segmentation
LiDAR segmentation
0.312018
SqueezeSeg: Convolutional Neural Nets with Recurrent CRF for Real-Time Road-Object Segmentation from 3D LiDAR Point Cloud · ICRA 2018
Robotics › Autonomous driving
perception
0.312018
SqueezeSeg: Convolutional Neural Nets with Recurrent CRF for Real-Time Road-Object Segmentation from 3D LiDAR Point Cloud · ICRA 2018
Computer vision › 3D vision
point cloud processing
0.312018
SqueezeSeg: Convolutional Neural Nets with Recurrent CRF for Real-Time Road-Object Segmentation from 3D LiDAR Point Cloud · ICRA 2018
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › feedforward neural network
multi-branch network
0.212023
UPSCALE: Unconstrained Channel Pruning · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
hyperparameter optimization
0.112021
FBNetV3: Joint Architecture-Recipe Search Using Predictor Pretraining · CVPR 2021
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis › face recognition
face verification
0.112018
Shift: A Zero FLOP, Zero Parameter Alternative to Spatial Convolutions · CVPR 2018
Robotics › Autonomous driving › perception
LiDAR perception
0.112018
SqueezeSeg: Convolutional Neural Nets with Recurrent CRF for Real-Time Road-Object Segmentation from 3D LiDAR Point Cloud · ICRA 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

loss-based training · 0.9fine-tuning · 0.9activation steering · 0.9unconstrained pruning · 0.7neighborhood merging · 0.7channel reordering · 0.7balanced clustering · 0.7adaptive downsampling · 0.7predictor pretraining · 0.5evolutionary search · 0.5convolution · 0.5attention mechanism · 0.5accuracy predictor · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Representation Bending for Large Language Model Safety
abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as powerful tools, but their inherent safety risks - ranging from harmful content generation to broader societal harms - pose significant challenges. These risks can be amplified by the recent adversarial attacks, fine-tuning vulnerabilities, and the increasing deployment of LLMs in high-stakes environments. Existing safety-enhancing techniques, such as fine-tuning with human feedback or adversarial training, are still vulnerable as they address specific threats and often fail to generalize across unseen attacks, or require manual system-level defenses. This paper introduces REPBEND, a novel approach that fundamentally disrupts the representations underlying harmful behaviors in LLMs, offering a scalable solution to enhance (potentially inherent) safety. REPBEND brings the idea of activation steering - simple vector arithmetic for steering model's behavior during inference - to loss-based fine-tuning. Through extensive evaluation, REPBEND achieves state-of-the-art performance, outperforming prior methods such as Circuit Breaker, RMU, and NPO, with up to 95% reduction in attack success rates across diverse jailbreak benchmarks, all with negligible reduction in model usability and general capabilities.
Ashkan Yousefpour, Taeheon Kim, Ryan Sungmo Kwon, Seungbeen Lee, Wonje Jeung, Seungju Han 0002, Alvin Wan, Harrison Ngan, Youngjae Yu
ACL (1)7
2023 AutoFocusFormer: Image Segmentation off the Grid
abstract
Real world images often have highly imbalanced content density. Some areas are very uniform, e.g., large patches of blue sky, while other areas are scattered with many small objects. Yet, the commonly used successive grid downsampling strategy in convolutional deep networks treats all areas equally. Hence, small objects are represented in very few spatial locations, leading to worse results in tasks such as segmentation. Intuitively, retaining more pixels representing small objects during downsampling helps to preserve important information. To achieve this, we propose AutoFocusFormer (AFF), a local-attention transformer image recognition backbone, which performs adaptive down-sampling by learning to retain the most important pixels for the task. Since adaptive downsampling generates a set of pixels irregularly distributed on the image plane, we abandon the classic grid structure. Instead, we develop a novel point-based local attention block, facilitated by a balanced clustering module and a learnable neighborhood merging module, which yields representations for our point-based versions of state-of-the-art segmentation heads. Experiments show that our AutoFocusFormer (AFF) improves significantly over baseline models of similar sizes.
Kaushik Patnaik, Shuangfei Zhai, Alvin Wan, Zhile Ren, Alexander G. Schwing, Alex Colburn, Fuxin Li
CVPR4
2023 UPSCALE: Unconstrained Channel Pruning
abstract
As neural networks grow in size and complexity, inference speeds decline. To combat this, one of the most effective compression techniques -- channel pruning -- removes channels from weights. However, for multi-branch segments of a model, channel removal can introduce inference-time memory copies. In turn, these copies increase inference latency -- so much so that the pruned model can be slower than the unpruned model. As a workaround, pruners conventionally constrain certain channels to be pruned together. This fully eliminates memory copies but, as we show, significantly impairs accuracy. We now have a dilemma: Remove constraints but increase latency, or add constraints and impair accuracy. In response, our insight is to reorder channels at export time, (1) reducing latency by reducing memory copies and (2) improving accuracy by removing constraints. Using this insight, we design a generic algorithm UPSCALE to prune models with any pruning pattern. By removing constraints from existing pruners, we improve ImageNet accuracy for post-training pruned models by 2.1 points on average -- benefiting DenseNet (+16.9), EfficientNetV2 (+7.9), and ResNet (+6.2). Furthermore, by reordering channels, UPSCALE improves inference speeds by up to 2x over a baseline export.
Alvin Wan, Hanxiang Hao, Kaushik Patnaik, Yueyang Xu, Omer Hadad, David Guera, Zhile Ren, Qi Shan
ICML1
2021 FBNetV3: Joint Architecture-Recipe Search Using Predictor Pretraining
abstract
Neural Architecture Search (NAS) yields state-of-the-art neural networks that outperform their best manually-designed counterparts. However, previous NAS methods search for architectures under one set of training hyper-parameters (i.e., a training recipe), overlooking superior architecture-recipe combinations. To address this, we present Neural Architecture-Recipe Search (NARS) to search both (a) architectures and (b) their corresponding training recipes, simultaneously. NARS utilizes an accuracy predictor that scores architecture and training recipes jointly, guiding both sample selection and ranking. Furthermore, to compensate for the enlarged search space, we leverage "free" architecture statistics (e.g., FLOP count) to pretrain the predictor, significantly improving its sample efficiency and prediction reliability. After training the predictor via constrained iterative optimization, we run fast evolutionary searches in just CPU minutes to generate architecturerecipe pairs for a variety of resource constraints, called FBNetV3. FBNetV3 makes up a family of state-of-the-art compact neural networks that outperform both automatically and manually-designed competitors. For example, FB-NetV3 matches both EfficientNet and ResNeSt accuracy on ImageNet with up to 2.0× and 7.1 × fewer FLOPs, respectively. Furthermore, FBNetV3 yields significant performance gains for downstream object detection tasks, improving mAP despite 18% fewer FLOPs and 34% fewer parameters than EfficientNet-based equivalents.
Xiaoliang Dai, Alvin Wan, Peizhao Zhang, Bichen Wu, Yuandong Tian, Matthew Yu, Peter Vajda, Joseph Gonzalez 0001
CVPR2
2021 Visual Transformers: Where Do Transformers Really Belong in Vision Models?
abstract
A recent trend in computer vision is to replace convolutions with transformers. However, the performance gain of transformers is attained at a steep cost, requiring GPU years and hundreds of millions of samples for training. This excessive resource usage compensates for a misuse of transformers: Transformers densely model relationships between its inputs - ideal for late stages of a neural network, when concepts are sparse and spatially-distant, but extremely inefficient for early stages of a network, when patterns are redundant and localized. To address these issues, we leverage the respective strengths of both operations, building convolution-transformer hybrids. Critically, in sharp contrast to pixel-space transformers, our Visual Transformer (VT) operates in a semantic token space, judiciously attending to different image parts based on context. Our VTs significantly outperforms baselines: On ImageNet, our VT-ResNets outperform convolution-only ResNet by 4.6 to 7 points and transformer-only ViT-B by 2.6 points with 2.5× fewer FLOPs, 2.1× fewer parameters. For semantic segmentation on LIP and COCO-stuff, VT-based feature pyramid networks (FPN) achieve 0.35 points higher mIoU while reducing the FPN module’s FLOPs by 6.5x.
Bichen Wu, Chenfeng Xu, Xiaoliang Dai, Alvin Wan, Peizhao Zhang, Zhicheng Yan 0001, Masayoshi Tomizuka, Joseph Gonzalez 0001, Kurt Keutzer, Peter Vajda
ICCV4
2021 NBDT: Neural-Backed Decision Tree
Alvin Wan, Lisa Dunlap, Daniel Ho, Jihan Yin, Scott Lee, Suzanne Petryk, Sarah Adel Bargal, Joseph Gonzalez 0001
ICLR1
2020 FBNetV2: Differentiable Neural Architecture Search for Spatial and Channel Dimensions
abstract
Differentiable Neural Architecture Search (DNAS) has demonstrated great success in designing state-of-the-art, efficient neural networks. However, DARTS-based DNAS's search space is small when compared to other search methods', since all candidate network layers must be explicitly instantiated in memory. To address this bottleneck, we propose a memory and computationally efficient DNAS variant: DMaskingNAS. This algorithm expands the search space by up to 10^14x over conventional DNAS, supporting searches over spatial and channel dimensions that are otherwise prohibitively expensive: input resolution and number of filters. We propose a masking mechanism for feature map reuse, so that memory and computational costs stay nearly constant as the search space expands. Furthermore, we employ effective shape propagation to maximize per-FLOP or per-parameter accuracy. The searched FBNetV2s yield state-of-the-art performance when compared with all previous architectures. With up to 421x less search cost, DMaskingNAS finds models with 0.9% higher accuracy, 15% fewer FLOPs than MobileNetV3-Small; and with similar accuracy but 20% fewer FLOPs than Efficient-B0. Furthermore, our FBNetV2 outperforms MobileNetV3 by 2.6% in accuracy, with equivalent model size. FBNetV2 models are open-sourced at https://github.com/facebookresearch/mobile-vision.
Alvin Wan, Xiaoliang Dai, Peizhao Zhang, Yuandong Tian, Saining Xie, Bichen Wu, Matthew Yu, Peter Vajda, Joseph Gonzalez 0001
CVPR1
2018 Shift: A Zero FLOP, Zero Parameter Alternative to Spatial Convolutions
abstract
Neural networks rely on convolutions to aggregate spatial information. However, spatial convolutions are expensive in terms of model size and computation, both of which grow quadratically with respect to kernel size. In this paper, we present a parameter-free, FLOP-free "shift" operation as an alternative to spatial convolutions. We fuse shifts and point-wise convolutions to construct end-to-end trainable shift-based modules, with a hyperparameter characterizing the tradeoff between accuracy and efficiency. To demonstrate the operation's efficacy, we replace ResNet's 3x3 convolutions with shift-based modules for improved CIFAR10 and CIFAR100 accuracy using 60% fewer parameters; we additionally demonstrate the operation's resilience to parameter reduction on ImageNet, outperforming ResNet family members. We finally show the shift operation's applicability across domains, achieving strong performance with fewer parameters on image classification, face verification and style transfer.
Bichen Wu, Alvin Wan, Xiangyu Yue 0001, Peter H. Jin, Sicheng Zhao, Noah Golmant, Amir Gholami, Joseph Gonzalez 0001, Kurt Keutzer
CVPR2
2018 SqueezeSeg: Convolutional Neural Nets with Recurrent CRF for Real-Time Road-Object Segmentation from 3D LiDAR Point Cloud
abstract
We address semantic segmentation of road-objects from 3D LiDAR point clouds. In particular, we wish to detect and categorize instances of interest, such as cars, pedestrians and cyclists. We formulate this problem as a point-wise classification problem, and propose an end-to-end pipeline called SqueezeSeg based on convolutional neural networks (CNN): the CNN takes a transformed LiDAR point cloud as input and directly outputs a point-wise label map, which is then refined by a conditional random field (CRF) implemented as a recurrent layer. Instance-level labels are then obtained by conventional clustering algorithms. Our CNN model is trained on LiDAR point clouds from the KITTI [1] dataset, and our point-wise segmentation labels are derived from 3D bounding boxes from KITTI. To obtain extra training data, we built a LiDAR simulator into Grand Theft Auto V (GTA-V), a popular video game, to synthesize large amounts of realistic training data. Our experiments show that SqueezeSeg achieves high accuracy with astonishingly fast and stable runtime (8.7±0.5 ms per frame), highly desirable for autonomous driving. Furthermore, additionally training on synthesized data boosts validation accuracy on real-world data. Our source code is open-source released1. The paper is accompanied by a video2containing a high level introduction and demonstrations of this work.
Bichen Wu, Alvin Wan, Xiangyu Yue 0001, Kurt Keutzer
ICRA2