Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Felix Leeb
dblp:207/7894
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Representation and self-supervised learning · 30% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 22% Deep learning architectures and training · 15% |
Topics — the 13 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
causal reasoning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | CLadder: A Benchmark to Assess Causal Reasoning Capabilities of Language Models · NeurIPS 2023 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
commonsense reasoning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | CLadder: A Benchmark to Assess Causal Reasoning Capabilities of Language Models · NeurIPS 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model evaluation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | CLadder: A Benchmark to Assess Causal Reasoning Capabilities of Language Models · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
structured representation learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Structure by Architecture: Structured Representations without Regularization · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
autoencoder |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Exploring the Latent Space of Autoencoders with Interventional Assays · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › disentangled representation learning
disentanglement |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Exploring the Latent Space of Autoencoders with Interventional Assays · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › latent space
latent space analysis |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Exploring the Latent Space of Autoencoders with Interventional Assays · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › sequence modeling
deep dynamics model |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | SE3-Pose-Nets: Structured Deep Dynamics Models for Visuomotor Control · ICRA 2018 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
model-based control |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | SE3-Pose-Nets: Structured Deep Dynamics Models for Visuomotor Control · ICRA 2018 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | SE3-Pose-Nets: Structured Deep Dynamics Models for Visuomotor Control · ICRA 2018 |
Robotics › Robot manipulation
visuomotor control |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | SE3-Pose-Nets: Structured Deep Dynamics Models for Visuomotor Control · ICRA 2018 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
variational autoencoder |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Exploring the Latent Space of Autoencoders with Interventional Assays · NeurIPS 2022 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
pose estimation |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | SE3-Pose-Nets: Structured Deep Dynamics Models for Visuomotor Control · ICRA 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
benchmark construction · 0.7architectural inductive bias · 0.7adversarial evaluation · 0.7latent response · 0.6interventional assay · 0.6gradient-based optimization · 0.3encoder-decoder network · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Structure by Architecture: Structured Representations without Regularization
Felix Leeb, Giulia Lanzillotta, Yashas Annadani, Michel Besserve, Stefan Bauer, Bernhard Schölkopf |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2023 | CLadder: A Benchmark to Assess Causal Reasoning Capabilities of Language Models
Zhijing Jin 0001, Yuen Chen, Felix Leeb, Luigi Gresele, Ojasv Kamal, Zhiheng Lyu, Kevin Blin, Fernando Gonzalez Adauto, Max Kleiman-Weiner, Mrinmaya Sachan, Bernhard Schölkopf |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2022 | Exploring the Latent Space of Autoencoders with Interventional AssaysabstractAutoencoders exhibit impressive abilities to embed the data manifold into a low-dimensional latent space, making them a staple of representation learning methods. However, without explicit supervision, which is often unavailable, the representation is usually uninterpretable, making analysis and principled progress challenging. We propose a framework, called latent responses, which exploits the locally contractive behavior exhibited by variational autoencoders to explore the learned manifold. More specifically, we develop tools to probe the representation using interventions in the latent space to quantify the relationships between latent variables. We extend the notion of disentanglement to take the learned generative process into account and consequently avoid the limitations of existing metrics that may rely on spurious correlations. Our analyses underscore the importance of studying the causal structure of the representation to improve performance on downstream tasks such as generation, interpolation, and inference of the factors of variation. Felix Leeb, Stefan Bauer, Michel Besserve, Bernhard Schölkopf |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2018 | SE3-Pose-Nets: Structured Deep Dynamics Models for Visuomotor ControlabstractIn this work, we present an approach to deep visuomotor control using structured deep dynamics models. Our model, a variant of SE3-Nets, learns a low-dimensional pose embedding for visuomotor control via an encoder-decoder structure. Unlike prior work, our model is structured: given an input scene, our network explicitly learns to segment salient parts and predict their pose embedding and motion, modeled as a change in the pose due to the applied actions. We train our model using a pair of point clouds separated by an action and show that given supervision only through point-wise data associations between the frames our network is able to learn a meaningful segmentation of the scene along with consistent poses. We further show that our model can be used for closed-loop control directly in the learned low-dimensional pose space, where the actions are computed by minimizing pose error using gradient-based methods, similar to traditional model-based control. We present results on controlling a Baxter robot from raw depth data in simulation and RGBD data in the real world and compare against two baseline deep networks. We also test the robustness and generalization performance of our controller under changes in camera pose, lighting, occlusion, and motion. Our method is robust, runs in real-time, achieves good prediction of scene dynamics, and outperforms baselines on multiple control runs. Video results can be found at: https://rse-lab.cs.washington.edu/se3-structured-deep-ctrl/. Arunkumar Byravan, Felix Leeb, Franziska Meier, Dieter Fox |
ICRA | 2 |