Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Felix Leeb

dblp:207/7894 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Representation and self-supervised learning · 30% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 22% Deep learning architectures and training · 15%

Topics — the 13 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
causal reasoning
0.712023
CLadder: A Benchmark to Assess Causal Reasoning Capabilities of Language Models · NeurIPS 2023
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
commonsense reasoning
0.712023
CLadder: A Benchmark to Assess Causal Reasoning Capabilities of Language Models · NeurIPS 2023
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model evaluation
0.712023
CLadder: A Benchmark to Assess Causal Reasoning Capabilities of Language Models · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
structured representation learning
0.712023
Structure by Architecture: Structured Representations without Regularization · ICLR 2023
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
autoencoder
0.612022
Exploring the Latent Space of Autoencoders with Interventional Assays · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › disentangled representation learning
disentanglement
0.612022
Exploring the Latent Space of Autoencoders with Interventional Assays · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › latent space
latent space analysis
0.612022
Exploring the Latent Space of Autoencoders with Interventional Assays · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › sequence modeling
deep dynamics model
0.312018
SE3-Pose-Nets: Structured Deep Dynamics Models for Visuomotor Control · ICRA 2018
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
model-based control
0.312018
SE3-Pose-Nets: Structured Deep Dynamics Models for Visuomotor Control · ICRA 2018
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control
0.312018
SE3-Pose-Nets: Structured Deep Dynamics Models for Visuomotor Control · ICRA 2018
Robotics › Robot manipulation
visuomotor control
0.312018
SE3-Pose-Nets: Structured Deep Dynamics Models for Visuomotor Control · ICRA 2018
Machine learning › Generative modeling
variational autoencoder
0.212022
Exploring the Latent Space of Autoencoders with Interventional Assays · NeurIPS 2022
Computer vision › 3D vision
pose estimation
0.112018
SE3-Pose-Nets: Structured Deep Dynamics Models for Visuomotor Control · ICRA 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

benchmark construction · 0.7architectural inductive bias · 0.7adversarial evaluation · 0.7latent response · 0.6interventional assay · 0.6gradient-based optimization · 0.3encoder-decoder network · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Structure by Architecture: Structured Representations without Regularization
Felix Leeb, Giulia Lanzillotta, Yashas Annadani, Michel Besserve, Stefan Bauer, Bernhard Schölkopf
ICLR1
2023 CLadder: A Benchmark to Assess Causal Reasoning Capabilities of Language Models
Zhijing Jin 0001, Yuen Chen, Felix Leeb, Luigi Gresele, Ojasv Kamal, Zhiheng Lyu, Kevin Blin, Fernando Gonzalez Adauto, Max Kleiman-Weiner, Mrinmaya Sachan, Bernhard Schölkopf
NeurIPS3
2022 Exploring the Latent Space of Autoencoders with Interventional Assays
abstract
Autoencoders exhibit impressive abilities to embed the data manifold into a low-dimensional latent space, making them a staple of representation learning methods. However, without explicit supervision, which is often unavailable, the representation is usually uninterpretable, making analysis and principled progress challenging. We propose a framework, called latent responses, which exploits the locally contractive behavior exhibited by variational autoencoders to explore the learned manifold. More specifically, we develop tools to probe the representation using interventions in the latent space to quantify the relationships between latent variables. We extend the notion of disentanglement to take the learned generative process into account and consequently avoid the limitations of existing metrics that may rely on spurious correlations. Our analyses underscore the importance of studying the causal structure of the representation to improve performance on downstream tasks such as generation, interpolation, and inference of the factors of variation.
Felix Leeb, Stefan Bauer, Michel Besserve, Bernhard Schölkopf
NeurIPS1
2018 SE3-Pose-Nets: Structured Deep Dynamics Models for Visuomotor Control
abstract
In this work, we present an approach to deep visuomotor control using structured deep dynamics models. Our model, a variant of SE3-Nets, learns a low-dimensional pose embedding for visuomotor control via an encoder-decoder structure. Unlike prior work, our model is structured: given an input scene, our network explicitly learns to segment salient parts and predict their pose embedding and motion, modeled as a change in the pose due to the applied actions. We train our model using a pair of point clouds separated by an action and show that given supervision only through point-wise data associations between the frames our network is able to learn a meaningful segmentation of the scene along with consistent poses. We further show that our model can be used for closed-loop control directly in the learned low-dimensional pose space, where the actions are computed by minimizing pose error using gradient-based methods, similar to traditional model-based control. We present results on controlling a Baxter robot from raw depth data in simulation and RGBD data in the real world and compare against two baseline deep networks. We also test the robustness and generalization performance of our controller under changes in camera pose, lighting, occlusion, and motion. Our method is robust, runs in real-time, achieves good prediction of scene dynamics, and outperforms baselines on multiple control runs. Video results can be found at: https://rse-lab.cs.washington.edu/se3-structured-deep-ctrl/.
Arunkumar Byravan, Felix Leeb, Franziska Meier, Dieter Fox
ICRA2