Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Aria HasanzadeZonuzy

dblp:207/7945 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
4as first author
4since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-9701-1405ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Reinforcement learning · 80% Learning theory · 20%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Computational complexity · 100%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
constrained reinforcement learning
1.022021
Model-Based Reinforcement Learning for Infinite-Horizon Discounted Constrained Markov Decision Processes · IJCAI 2021
Learning with Safety Constraints: Sample Complexity of Reinforcement Learning for Constrained MDPs · AAAI 2021
Machine learning › Learning theory
sample complexity
1.022021
Model-Based Reinforcement Learning for Infinite-Horizon Discounted Constrained Markov Decision Processes · IJCAI 2021
Learning with Safety Constraints: Sample Complexity of Reinforcement Learning for Constrained MDPs · AAAI 2021
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › markov decision process
constrained markov decision process
0.722022
DOPE: Doubly Optimistic and Pessimistic Exploration for Safe Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2022
Model-Based Reinforcement Learning for Infinite-Horizon Discounted Constrained Markov Decision Processes · IJCAI 2021
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
exploration
0.612022
DOPE: Doubly Optimistic and Pessimistic Exploration for Safe Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
safe reinforcement learning
0.612022
DOPE: Doubly Optimistic and Pessimistic Exploration for Safe Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
model-based reinforcement learning
0.512021
Model-Based Reinforcement Learning for Infinite-Horizon Discounted Constrained Markov Decision Processes · IJCAI 2021
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › safe reinforcement learning
safe policy learning
0.512021
Model-Based Reinforcement Learning for Infinite-Horizon Discounted Constrained Markov Decision Processes · IJCAI 2021
Computational complexity › learning theory
sample complexity
0.512021
Learning with Safety Constraints: Sample Complexity of Reinforcement Learning for Constrained MDPs · AAAI 2021
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
markov decision process
0.112021
Model-Based Reinforcement Learning for Infinite-Horizon Discounted Constrained Markov Decision Processes · IJCAI 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

constrained markov decision process · 1.0PAC learning · 1.0regret analysis · 0.6constrained MDP · 0.6upper confidence bound exploration · 0.5generative model · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Towards Energy- and Cost-Efficient 6G Networks
abstract
As the world enters the journey toward the 6th generation (6G) of wireless technology, the promises of ultra-high data rates, unprecedented low latency, and a massive surge in connected devices require crucial exploration of network energy saving (NES) solutions to minimize the carbon footprint and overall energy usage of future cellular networks. On the other hand, network-controlled repeaters (NCRs) have been introduced by 3rd generation partnership project (3GPP) as a cost-effective solution to improve network coverage. However, their impact on network power consumption and energy efficiency has not been thoroughly investigated. This paper studies NES schemes for next-generation 6G networks aided by NCRs and proposes optimal NES strategies aiming at maximizing the overall energy efficiency of the network. Repeaters are shown to allow for power savings at next-generation nodeB (gNB), and offer higher overall energy efficiency (EE) and spectral efficiency (SE), thus providing an energy-efficient and cost-efficient alternative to increase the performance of future 6G networks.
Tommy Azzino, Aria HasanzadeZonuzy, Jianghong Luo, Navid Abedini, Tao Luo 0009
VTC Fall2
2022 DOPE: Doubly Optimistic and Pessimistic Exploration for Safe Reinforcement Learning
abstract
Safe reinforcement learning is extremely challenging--not only must the agent explore an unknown environment, it must do so while ensuring no safety constraint violations. We formulate this safe reinforcement learning (RL) problem using the framework of a finite-horizon Constrained Markov Decision Process (CMDP) with an unknown transition probability function, where we model the safety requirements as constraints on the expected cumulative costs that must be satisfied during all episodes of learning. We propose a model-based safe RL algorithm that we call Doubly Optimistic and Pessimistic Exploration (DOPE), and show that it achieves an objective regret $\tilde{O}(|\mathcal{S}|\sqrt{|\mathcal{A}| K})$ without violating the safety constraints during learning, where $|\mathcal{S}|$ is the number of states, $|\mathcal{A}|$ is the number of actions, and $K$ is the number of learning episodes. Our key idea is to combine a reward bonus for exploration (optimism) with a conservative constraint (pessimism), in addition to the standard optimistic model-based exploration. DOPE is not only able to improve the objective regret bound, but also shows a significant empirical performance improvement as compared to earlier optimism-pessimism approaches.
Archana Bura, Aria HasanzadeZonuzy, Dileep M. Kalathil, Srinivas Shakkottai, Jean-François Chamberland
NeurIPS2
2021 Learning with Safety Constraints: Sample Complexity of Reinforcement Learning for Constrained MDPs
abstract
Many physical systems have underlying safety considerations that require that the policy employed ensures the satisfaction of a set of constraints. The analytical formulation usually takes the form of a Constrained Markov Decision Process (CMDP). We focus on the case where the CMDP is unknown, and RL algorithms obtain samples to discover the model and compute an optimal constrained policy. Our goal is to characterize the relationship between safety constraints and the number of samples needed to ensure a desired level of accuracy---both objective maximization and constraint satisfaction---in a PAC sense. We explore two classes of RL algorithms, namely, (i) a generative model based approach, wherein samples are taken initially to estimate a model, and (ii) an online approach, wherein the model is updated as samples are obtained. Our main finding is that compared to the best known bounds of the unconstrained regime, the sample complexity of constrained RL algorithms are increased by a factor that is logarithmic in the number of constraints, which suggests that the approach may be easily utilized in real systems.
Aria HasanzadeZonuzy, Archana Bura, Dileep M. Kalathil, Srinivas Shakkottai
AAAI1
2021 Model-Based Reinforcement Learning for Infinite-Horizon Discounted Constrained Markov Decision Processes
abstract
In many real-world reinforcement learning (RL) problems, in addition to maximizing the objective, the learning agent has to maintain some necessary safety constraints. We formulate the problem of learning a safe policy as an infinite-horizon discounted Constrained Markov Decision Process (CMDP) with an unknown transition probability matrix, where the safety requirements are modeled as constraints on expected cumulative costs. We propose two model-based constrained reinforcement learning (CRL) algorithms for learning a safe policy, namely, (i) GM-CRL algorithm, where the algorithm has access to a generative model, and (ii) UC-CRL algorithm, where the algorithm learns the model using an upper confidence style online exploration method. We characterize the sample complexity of these algorithms, i.e., the the number of samples needed to ensure a desired level of accuracy with high probability, both with respect to objective maximization and constraint satisfaction.
Aria HasanzadeZonuzy, Dileep M. Kalathil, Srinivas Shakkottai
IJCAI1
2020 Reinforcement Learning for Multi-Hop Scheduling and Routing of Real-Time Flows
Aria HasanzadeZonuzy, Dileep M. Kalathil, Srinivas Shakkottai
WiOpt1
2019 Broadcasting Real-Time Flows in Integrated Backhaul and Access 5G Networks
abstract
We study the problem of broadcasting realtime flows in multi-hop wireless networks. We assume that each packet has a stringent deadline, and each node in the network obtains some utility based on the number of packets delivered to it on time for each flow. We propose a distributed protocol called the delegated-set routing (DSR) that incurs virtually no overhead of coordination among nodes. We also develop distributed algorithms that aim to maximize the total timely utility under DSR. The utility of the DSR protocol and distributed algorithms are demonstrated by both theoretical analysis and simulation results. We show that our algorithms achieve higher timely throughput even when compared against centralized throughput optimal policies that do not consider deadline constraints.
Aria HasanzadeZonuzy, I-Hong Hou, Srinivas Shakkottai
WiOpt1