Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ashwin A. Kannan
dblp:207/8199
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Representation and self-supervised learning · 61% Trustworthy machine learning · 30% Face, body and person analysis · 9% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
invariant representation |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Max-Margin Invariant Features from Transformed Unlabelled Data · NIPS 2017 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
invariant representation learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Max-Margin Invariant Features from Transformed Unlabelled Data · NIPS 2017 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › input transformation robustness
robustness to image transformations |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Max-Margin Invariant Features from Transformed Unlabelled Data · NIPS 2017 |
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis
face recognition |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | Max-Margin Invariant Features from Transformed Unlabelled Data · NIPS 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
max-margin learning · 0.3invariant kernel SVM · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | Max-Margin Invariant Features from Transformed Unlabelled DataabstractThe study of representations invariant to common transformations of the data is important to learning. Most techniques have focused on local approximate invariance implemented within expensive optimization frameworks lacking explicit theoretical guarantees. In this paper, we study kernels that are invariant to a unitary group while having theoretical guarantees in addressing the important practical issue of unavailability of transformed versions of labelled data. A problem we call the Unlabeled Transformation Problem which is a special form of semi-supervised learning and one-shot learning. We present a theoretically motivated alternate approach to the invariant kernel SVM based on which we propose Max-Margin Invariant Features (MMIF) to solve this problem. As an illustration, we design an framework for face recognition and demonstrate the efficacy of our approach on a large scale semi-synthetic dataset with 153,000 images and a new challenging protocol on Labelled Faces in the Wild (LFW) while out-performing strong baselines. Dipan K. Pal, Ashwin A. Kannan, Gautam Arakalgud, Marios Savvides |
NIPS | 2 |