Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ashwin A. Kannan

dblp:207/8199 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Representation and self-supervised learning · 61% Trustworthy machine learning · 30% Face, body and person analysis · 9%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
invariant representation
0.312017
Max-Margin Invariant Features from Transformed Unlabelled Data · NIPS 2017
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
invariant representation learning
0.312017
Max-Margin Invariant Features from Transformed Unlabelled Data · NIPS 2017
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › input transformation robustness
robustness to image transformations
0.312017
Max-Margin Invariant Features from Transformed Unlabelled Data · NIPS 2017
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis
face recognition
0.112017
Max-Margin Invariant Features from Transformed Unlabelled Data · NIPS 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

max-margin learning · 0.3invariant kernel SVM · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 Max-Margin Invariant Features from Transformed Unlabelled Data
abstract
The study of representations invariant to common transformations of the data is important to learning. Most techniques have focused on local approximate invariance implemented within expensive optimization frameworks lacking explicit theoretical guarantees. In this paper, we study kernels that are invariant to a unitary group while having theoretical guarantees in addressing the important practical issue of unavailability of transformed versions of labelled data. A problem we call the Unlabeled Transformation Problem which is a special form of semi-supervised learning and one-shot learning. We present a theoretically motivated alternate approach to the invariant kernel SVM based on which we propose Max-Margin Invariant Features (MMIF) to solve this problem. As an illustration, we design an framework for face recognition and demonstrate the efficacy of our approach on a large scale semi-synthetic dataset with 153,000 images and a new challenging protocol on Labelled Faces in the Wild (LFW) while out-performing strong baselines.
Dipan K. Pal, Ashwin A. Kannan, Gautam Arakalgud, Marios Savvides
NIPS2