EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Digvijay Boob
dblp:207/8455
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
4 papers |
Mathematical optimization · 64% Graph algorithms and graph theory · 22% Approximation and online algorithms · 14% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Optimization for machine learning · 62% Learning theory · 19% Efficient and distributed learning · 19% |
Topics — the 15 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Graph algorithms and graph theory › dense subgraph discovery
densest subgraph |
0.8 | 2 | 2020 | Flowless: Extracting Densest Subgraphs Without Flow Computations · WWW 2020 Faster width-dependent algorithm for mixed packing and covering LPs · NeurIPS 2019 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization › first-order methods › gradient-based optimization
accelerated gradient methods |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Accelerated Primal-Dual Methods for Convex-Strongly-Concave Saddle Point Problems · ICML 2023 |
Mathematical optimization
minimax optimization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Accelerated Primal-Dual Methods for Convex-Strongly-Concave Saddle Point Problems · ICML 2023 |
Mathematical optimization
primal-dual method |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Accelerated Primal-Dual Methods for Convex-Strongly-Concave Saddle Point Problems · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
gradient-based optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | A Feasible Level Proximal Point Method for Nonconvex Sparse Constrained Optimization · NeurIPS 2020 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory
dense subgraph discovery |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Flowless: Extracting Densest Subgraphs Without Flow Computations · WWW 2020 |
Approximation and online algorithms › approximation algorithms › combinatorial approximation algorithms
greedy approximation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Flowless: Extracting Densest Subgraphs Without Flow Computations · WWW 2020 |
Mathematical optimization
nonconvex optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | A Feasible Level Proximal Point Method for Nonconvex Sparse Constrained Optimization · NeurIPS 2020 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization › proximal methods
proximal point method |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | A Feasible Level Proximal Point Method for Nonconvex Sparse Constrained Optimization · NeurIPS 2020 |
Approximation and online algorithms
approximation algorithms |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Faster width-dependent algorithm for mixed packing and covering LPs · NeurIPS 2019 |
Mathematical optimization
linear programming |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Faster width-dependent algorithm for mixed packing and covering LPs · NeurIPS 2019 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
convex optimization |
0.3 | 2 | 2023 | Accelerated Primal-Dual Methods for Convex-Strongly-Concave Saddle Point Problems · ICML 2023 Faster width-dependent algorithm for mixed packing and covering LPs · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
high-dimensional learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | A Feasible Level Proximal Point Method for Nonconvex Sparse Constrained Optimization · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
sparsity |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | A Feasible Level Proximal Point Method for Nonconvex Sparse Constrained Optimization · NeurIPS 2020 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization
area convexity |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Faster width-dependent algorithm for mixed packing and covering LPs · NeurIPS 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
proximal point algorithm · 0.9projection · 0.9KKT conditions · 0.9primal-dual method · 0.7linear approximation · 0.7accelerated gradient descent · 0.7maximum flow · 0.4greedy approximation · 0.4nesterov smoothing · 0.4area convexity · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Accelerated Primal-Dual Methods for Convex-Strongly-Concave Saddle Point ProblemsabstractWe investigate a primal-dual (PD) method for the saddle point problem (SPP) that uses a linear approximation of the primal function instead of the standard proximal step, resulting in a linearized PD (LPD) method. For convex-strongly concave SPP, we observe that the LPD method has a suboptimal dependence on the Lipschitz constant of the primal function. To fix this issue, we combine features of Accelerated Gradient Descent with the LPD method resulting in a single-loop Accelerated Linearized Primal-Dual (ALPD) method. ALPD method achieves the optimal gradient complexity when the SPP has a semi-linear coupling function. We also present an inexact ALPD method for SPPs with a general nonlinear coupling function that maintains the optimal gradient evaluations of the primal parts and significantly improves the gradient evaluations of the coupling term compared to the ALPD method. We verify our findings with numerical experiments. Mohammad Khalafi, Digvijay Boob |
ICML | 2 |
| 2020 | A Feasible Level Proximal Point Method for Nonconvex Sparse Constrained OptimizationabstractNonconvex sparse models have received significant attention in high-dimensional machine learning. In this paper, we study a new model consisting of a general convex or nonconvex objectives and a variety of continuous nonconvex sparsity-inducing constraints. For this constrained model, we propose a novel proximal point algorithm that solves a sequence of convex subproblems with gradually relaxed constraint levels. Each subproblem, having a proximal point objective and a convex surrogate constraint, can be efficiently solved based on a fast routine for projection onto the surrogate constraint. We establish the asymptotic convergence of the proposed algorithm to the Karush-Kuhn-Tucker (KKT) solutions. We also establish new convergence complexities to achieve an approximate KKT solution when the objective can be smooth/nonsmooth, deterministic/stochastic and convex/nonconvex with complexity that is on a par with gradient descent for unconstrained optimization problems in respective cases. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study of the first-order methods with complexity guarantee for nonconvex sparse-constrained problems. We perform numerical experiments to demonstrate the effectiveness of our new model and efficiency of the proposed algorithm for large scale problems. Digvijay Boob, Guanghui Lan |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2020 | Flowless: Extracting Densest Subgraphs Without Flow ComputationsabstractThe problem of finding dense components of a graph is a major primitive in graph mining and data analysis. The densest subgraph problem (DSP) that asks to find a subgraph with maximum average degree forms a basic primitive in dense subgraph discovery with applications ranging from community detection to unsupervised discovery of biological network modules [16]. The DSP is exactly solvable in polynomial time using maximum flows [14, 17, 22]. Due to the high computational cost of maximum flows, Charikar’s greedy approximation algorithm is usually preferred in practice due to its linear time and linear space complexity [3, 8]. It constitutes a key algorithmic idea in scalable solutions for large-scale dynamic graphs [5, 7]. However, its output density can be a factor 2 off the optimal solution. Digvijay Boob, Yu Gao 0001, Richard Peng, Saurabh Sawlani, Charalampos E. Tsourakakis, Di Wang 0005, Junxing Wang |
WWW | 1 |
| 2019 | Faster width-dependent algorithm for mixed packing and covering LPsabstractIn this paper, we give a faster width-dependent algorithm for mixed packing-covering LPs. Mixed packing-covering LPs are fundamental to combinatorial optimization in computer science and operations research. Our algorithm finds a $1+\eps$ approximate solution in time $O(Nw/ \varepsilon)$, where $N$ is number of nonzero entries in the constraint matrix, and $w$ is the maximum number of nonzeros in any constraint. This algorithm is faster than Nesterov's smoothing algorithm which requires $O(N\sqrt{n}w/ \eps)$ time, where $n$ is the dimension of the problem. Our work utilizes the framework of area convexity introduced in [Sherman-FOCS'17] to obtain the best dependence on $\varepsilon$ while breaking the infamous $\ell_{\infty}$ barrier to eliminate the factor of $\sqrt{n}$. The current best width-independent algorithm for this problem runs in time $O(N/\eps^2)$ [Young-arXiv-14] and hence has worse running time dependence on $\varepsilon$. Many real life instances of mixed packing-covering problems exhibit small width and for such cases, our algorithm can report higher precision results when compared to width-independent algorithms. As a special case of our result, we report a $1+\varepsilon$ approximation algorithm for the densest subgraph problem which runs in time $O(md/ \varepsilon)$, where $m$ is the number of edges in the graph and $d$ is the maximum graph degree. Digvijay Boob, Saurabh Sawlani |
NeurIPS | 1 |