Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Federica Gerace
dblp:207/8528
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-8992-5506ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Learning theory · 54% Deep learning architectures and training · 25% Representation and self-supervised learning · 12% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Learning theory › computational learning theory
computational-statistical gap |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Learning from higher-order correlations, efficiently: hypothesis tests, random features, and neural networks · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
learning dynamics |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | A distributional simplicity bias in the learning dynamics of transformers · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › inductive bias
simplicity bias |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | A distributional simplicity bias in the learning dynamics of transformers · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
transformer |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | A distributional simplicity bias in the learning dynamics of transformers · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › weight initialization
critical initialization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Critical initialisation in continuous approximations of binary neural networks · ICLR 2020 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization error |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Generalisation error in learning with random features and the hidden manifold model · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › kernel methods › kernel approximation
random features |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Generalisation error in learning with random features and the hidden manifold model · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
weight initialization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Critical initialisation in continuous approximations of binary neural networks · ICLR 2020 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
sample complexity |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Learning from higher-order correlations, efficiently: hypothesis tests, random features, and neural networks · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › over-parameterization
double descent |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Generalisation error in learning with random features and the hidden manifold model · ICML 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
random features · 0.8low-degree conjecture · 0.8interaction order analysis · 0.8hypothesis testing · 0.8clone dataset generation · 0.8signal propagation analysis · 0.4replica method · 0.4neural tangent kernel · 0.4mean-field theory · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | A distributional simplicity bias in the learning dynamics of transformersabstractThe remarkable capability of over-parameterised neural networks to generalise effectively has been explained by invoking a ``simplicity bias'': neural networks prevent overfitting by initially learning simple classifiers before progressing to more complex, non-linear functions. While simplicity biases have been described theoretically and experimentally in feed-forward networks for supervised learning, the extent to which they also explain the remarkable success of transformers trained with self-supervised techniques remains unclear. In our study, we demonstrate that transformers, trained on natural language data, also display a simplicity bias. Specifically, they sequentially learn many-body interactions among input tokens, reaching a saturation point in the prediction error for low-degree interactions while continuing to learn high-degree interactions. To conduct this analysis, we develop a procedure to generate \textit{clones} of a given natural language data set, which rigorously capture the interactions between tokens up to a specified order. This approach opens up the possibilities of studying how interactions of different orders in the data affect learning, in natural language processing and beyond. Riccardo Rende, Federica Gerace, Alessandro Laio, Sebastian Goldt |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2024 | Learning from higher-order correlations, efficiently: hypothesis tests, random features, and neural networksabstractNeural networks excel at discovering statistical patterns in
high-dimensional data sets. In practice, higher-order cumulants, which quantify
the non-Gaussian correlations between three or more variables, are particularly
important for the performance of neural networks. But how efficient are neural
networks at extracting features from higher-order cumulants? We study this
question in the spiked cumulant model, where the statistician needs to recover a
privileged direction or "spike'' from the order-$p\ge 4$ cumulants
of $d$-dimensional inputs.
We first discuss the fundamental statistical and
computational limits of recovering the spike by analysing the number of
samples $n$ required to strongly distinguish between inputs from the spiked
cumulant model and isotropic Gaussian inputs.
Existing literature established the presence of a wide statistical-to-computational gap in this problem. We deepen this line of work by finding an exact formula for the likelihood ratio norm which proves that statistical
distinguishability requires $n\gtrsim d$ samples, while distinguishing the two
distributions in polynomial time requires $n \gtrsim d^2$ samples for a wide
class of algorithms, i.e. those covered by the low-degree conjecture.
Numerical experiments show that neural networks do indeed learn to distinguish
the two distributions with quadratic sample complexity, while ``lazy'' methods
like random features are not better than random guessing in this regime. Our
results show that neural networks extract information from higher-order
correlations in the spiked cumulant model efficiently, and reveal a large gap in
the amount of data required by neural networks and random features to learn from
higher-order cumulants. Eszter Székely, Lorenzo Bardone, Federica Gerace, Sebastian Goldt |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2020 | Critical initialisation in continuous approximations of binary neural networks
George Stamatescu, Federica Gerace, Carlo Lucibello, Ian G. Fuss, Langford B. White |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2020 | Generalisation error in learning with random features and the hidden manifold modelabstractWe study generalised linear regression and classification for a synthetically generated dataset encompassing different problems of interest, such as learning with random features, neural networks in the lazy training regime, and the hidden manifold model. We consider the high-dimensional regime and using the replica method from statistical physics, we provide a closed-form expression for the asymptotic generalisation performance in these problems, valid in both the under- and over-parametrised regimes and for a broad choice of generalised linear model loss functions. In particular, we show how to obtain analytically the so-called double descent behaviour for logistic regression with a peak at the interpolation threshold, we illustrate the superiority of orthogonal against random Gaussian projections in learning with random features, and discuss the role played by correlations in the data generated by the hidden manifold model. Beyond the interest in these particular problems, the theoretical formalism introduced in this manuscript provides a path to further extensions to more complex tasks. Federica Gerace, Bruno Loureiro, Florent Krzakala, Marc Mézard, Lenka Zdeborová |
ICML | 1 |