Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Anton Mallasto

dblp:209/4851 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
4as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 4 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Learning theory · 29% Representation and self-supervised learning · 29% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 21%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Medical and health informatics · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Learning theory › neural network theory
deep network analysis
0.912025
From Alexnet to Transformers: Measuring the Non-linearity of Deep Neural Networks with Affine Optimal Transport · CVPR 2025
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
representation analysis
0.912025
From Alexnet to Transformers: Measuring the Non-linearity of Deep Neural Networks with Affine Optimal Transport · CVPR 2025
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › gaussian process
gaussian process regression
0.312018
Wrapped Gaussian Process Regression on Riemannian Manifolds · CVPR 2018
Computer vision › 3D vision › geometric deep learning
manifold-valued data
0.312018
Wrapped Gaussian Process Regression on Riemannian Manifolds · CVPR 2018
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
gaussian process
0.312017
Learning from uncertain curves: The 2-Wasserstein metric for Gaussian processes · NIPS 2017
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › optimal transport
wasserstein distance
0.312017
Learning from uncertain curves: The 2-Wasserstein metric for Gaussian processes · NIPS 2017
Medical and health informatics › neuroimaging › diffusion MRI analysis
diffusion tensor imaging
0.112018
Wrapped Gaussian Process Regression on Riemannian Manifolds · CVPR 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

optimal transport · 1.2affine optimal transport · 0.9wrapped gaussian process · 0.7riemannian geometry · 0.72-wasserstein metric · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 From Alexnet to Transformers: Measuring the Non-linearity of Deep Neural Networks with Affine Optimal Transport
abstract
In the last decade, we have witnessed the introduction of several novel deep neural network (DNN) architectures exhibiting ever-increasing performance across diverse tasks. Explaining the upward trend of their performance, however, remains difficult as different DNN architectures of comparable depth and width – common factors associated with their expressive power – may exhibit a drastically different performance even when trained on the same dataset. In this paper, we introduce the concept of the non-linearity signature of DNN, the first theoretically sound solution for approximately measuring the non-linearity of deep neural networks. Built upon a score derived from closed-form optimal transport mappings, this signature provides a better understanding of the inner workings of a wide range of DNN architectures and learning paradigms, with a particular emphasis on the computer vision task. We provide extensive experimental results that highlight the practical usefulness of the proposed non-linearity signature and its potential for long-reaching implications. The code for our work is available at https://github.com/qbouniot/AffScoreDeep.
Quentin Bouniot, Ievgen Redko, Anton Mallasto, Charlotte Laclau, Oliver Struckmeier, Karol Arndt, Markus Heinonen, Ville Kyrki, Samuel Kaski
CVPR3
2021 Bayesian Inference for Optimal Transport with Stochastic Cost
abstract
In machine learning and computer vision, optimal transport has had significant success inlearning generative models and defining metric distances between structured and stochasticdata objects, that can be cast as probability measures. The key element of optimal trans-port is the so called lifting of anexactcost (distance) function, defined on the sample space,to a cost (distance) between probability measures over the sample space. However, in manyreal life applications the cost isstochastic: e.g., the unpredictable traffic flow affects the costof transportation between a factory and an outlet. To take this stochasticity into account,we introduce a Bayesian framework for inferring the optimal transport plan distributioninduced by the stochastic cost, allowing for a principled way to include prior informationand to model the induced stochasticity on the transport plans. Additionally, we tailor anHMC method to sample from the resulting transport plan posterior distribution.
Anton Mallasto, Markus Heinonen, Samuel Kaski
ACML1
2019 Probabilistic Riemannian submanifold learning with wrapped Gaussian process latent variable models
abstract
Latent variable models (LVMs) learn probabilistic models of data manifolds lying in an ambient Euclidean space. In a number of applications, a priori known spatial constraints can shrink the ambient space into a considerably smaller manifold. Additionally, in these applications the Euclidean geometry might induce a suboptimal similarity measure, which could be improved by choosing a different metric. Euclidean models ignore such information and assign probability mass to data points that can never appear as data, and vastly different likelihoods to points that are similar under the desired metric.We propose the wrapped Gaussian process latent variable model (WGPLVM), that extends Gaussian process latent variable models to take values strictly on a given Riemannian manifold, making the model blind to impossible data points. This allows non-linear, probabilistic inference of low-dimensional Riemannian submanifolds from data. Our evaluation on diverse datasets show that we improve performance on several tasks, including encoding, visualization and uncertainty quantification.
Anton Mallasto, Søren Hauberg, Aasa Feragen
AISTATS1
2018 Wrapped Gaussian Process Regression on Riemannian Manifolds
abstract
Gaussian process (GP) regression is a powerful tool in non-parametric regression providing uncertainty estimates. However, it is limited to data in vector spaces. In fields such as shape analysis and diffusion tensor imaging, the data often lies on a manifold, making GP regression nonviable, as the resulting predictive distribution does not live in the correct geometric space. We tackle the problem by defining wrapped Gaussian processes (WGPs) on Riemannian manifolds, using the probabilistic setting to generalize GP regression to the context of manifold-valued targets. The method is validated empirically on diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) data, directional data on the sphere and in the Kendall shape space, endorsing WGP regression as an efficient and flexible tool for manifold-valued regression.
Anton Mallasto, Aasa Feragen
CVPR1
2017 Learning from uncertain curves: The 2-Wasserstein metric for Gaussian processes
abstract
We introduce a novel framework for statistical analysis of populations of non-degenerate Gaussian processes (GPs), which are natural representations of uncertain curves. This allows inherent variation or uncertainty in function-valued data to be properly incorporated in the population analysis. Using the 2-Wasserstein metric we geometrize the space of GPs with L2 mean and covariance functions over compact index spaces. We prove uniqueness of the barycenter of a population of GPs, as well as convergence of the metric and the barycenter of their finite-dimensional counterparts. This justifies practical computations. Finally, we demonstrate our framework through experimental validation on GP datasets representing brain connectivity and climate development. A Matlab library for relevant computations will be published at https://sites.google.com/view/antonmallasto/software.
Anton Mallasto, Aasa Feragen
NIPS1