Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Anton Mallasto
dblp:209/4851
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
4as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 4 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Learning theory · 29% Representation and self-supervised learning · 29% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 21% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Medical and health informatics · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Learning theory › neural network theory
deep network analysis |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | From Alexnet to Transformers: Measuring the Non-linearity of Deep Neural Networks with Affine Optimal Transport · CVPR 2025 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
representation analysis |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | From Alexnet to Transformers: Measuring the Non-linearity of Deep Neural Networks with Affine Optimal Transport · CVPR 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › gaussian process
gaussian process regression |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Wrapped Gaussian Process Regression on Riemannian Manifolds · CVPR 2018 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › geometric deep learning
manifold-valued data |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Wrapped Gaussian Process Regression on Riemannian Manifolds · CVPR 2018 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
gaussian process |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Learning from uncertain curves: The 2-Wasserstein metric for Gaussian processes · NIPS 2017 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › optimal transport
wasserstein distance |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Learning from uncertain curves: The 2-Wasserstein metric for Gaussian processes · NIPS 2017 |
Medical and health informatics › neuroimaging › diffusion MRI analysis
diffusion tensor imaging |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Wrapped Gaussian Process Regression on Riemannian Manifolds · CVPR 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
optimal transport · 1.2affine optimal transport · 0.9wrapped gaussian process · 0.7riemannian geometry · 0.72-wasserstein metric · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | From Alexnet to Transformers: Measuring the Non-linearity of Deep Neural Networks with Affine Optimal TransportabstractIn the last decade, we have witnessed the introduction of several novel deep neural network (DNN) architectures exhibiting ever-increasing performance across diverse tasks. Explaining the upward trend of their performance, however, remains difficult as different DNN architectures of comparable depth and width – common factors associated with their expressive power – may exhibit a drastically different performance even when trained on the same dataset. In this paper, we introduce the concept of the non-linearity signature of DNN, the first theoretically sound solution for approximately measuring the non-linearity of deep neural networks. Built upon a score derived from closed-form optimal transport mappings, this signature provides a better understanding of the inner workings of a wide range of DNN architectures and learning paradigms, with a particular emphasis on the computer vision task. We provide extensive experimental results that highlight the practical usefulness of the proposed non-linearity signature and its potential for long-reaching implications. The code for our work is available at https://github.com/qbouniot/AffScoreDeep. Quentin Bouniot, Ievgen Redko, Anton Mallasto, Charlotte Laclau, Oliver Struckmeier, Karol Arndt, Markus Heinonen, Ville Kyrki, Samuel Kaski |
CVPR | 3 |
| 2021 | Bayesian Inference for Optimal Transport with Stochastic CostabstractIn machine learning and computer vision, optimal transport has had significant success inlearning generative models and defining metric distances between structured and stochasticdata objects, that can be cast as probability measures. The key element of optimal trans-port is the so called lifting of anexactcost (distance) function, defined on the sample space,to a cost (distance) between probability measures over the sample space. However, in manyreal life applications the cost isstochastic: e.g., the unpredictable traffic flow affects the costof transportation between a factory and an outlet. To take this stochasticity into account,we introduce a Bayesian framework for inferring the optimal transport plan distributioninduced by the stochastic cost, allowing for a principled way to include prior informationand to model the induced stochasticity on the transport plans. Additionally, we tailor anHMC method to sample from the resulting transport plan posterior distribution. Anton Mallasto, Markus Heinonen, Samuel Kaski |
ACML | 1 |
| 2019 | Probabilistic Riemannian submanifold learning with wrapped Gaussian process latent variable modelsabstractLatent variable models (LVMs) learn probabilistic models of data manifolds lying in an ambient Euclidean space. In a number of applications, a priori known spatial constraints can shrink the ambient space into a considerably smaller manifold. Additionally, in these applications the Euclidean geometry might induce a suboptimal similarity measure, which could be improved by choosing a different metric. Euclidean models ignore such information and assign probability mass to data points that can never appear as data, and vastly different likelihoods to points that are similar under the desired metric.We propose the wrapped Gaussian process latent variable model (WGPLVM), that extends Gaussian process latent variable models to take values strictly on a given Riemannian manifold, making the model blind to impossible data points. This allows non-linear, probabilistic inference of low-dimensional Riemannian submanifolds from data. Our evaluation on diverse datasets show that we improve performance on several tasks, including encoding, visualization and uncertainty quantification. Anton Mallasto, Søren Hauberg, Aasa Feragen |
AISTATS | 1 |
| 2018 | Wrapped Gaussian Process Regression on Riemannian ManifoldsabstractGaussian process (GP) regression is a powerful tool in non-parametric regression providing uncertainty estimates. However, it is limited to data in vector spaces. In fields such as shape analysis and diffusion tensor imaging, the data often lies on a manifold, making GP regression nonviable, as the resulting predictive distribution does not live in the correct geometric space. We tackle the problem by defining wrapped Gaussian processes (WGPs) on Riemannian manifolds, using the probabilistic setting to generalize GP regression to the context of manifold-valued targets. The method is validated empirically on diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) data, directional data on the sphere and in the Kendall shape space, endorsing WGP regression as an efficient and flexible tool for manifold-valued regression. Anton Mallasto, Aasa Feragen |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2017 | Learning from uncertain curves: The 2-Wasserstein metric for Gaussian processesabstractWe introduce a novel framework for statistical analysis of populations of non-degenerate Gaussian processes (GPs), which are natural representations of uncertain curves. This allows inherent variation or uncertainty in function-valued data to be properly incorporated in the population analysis. Using the 2-Wasserstein metric we geometrize the space of GPs with L2 mean and covariance functions over compact index spaces. We prove uniqueness of the barycenter of a population of GPs, as well as convergence of the metric and the barycenter of their finite-dimensional counterparts. This justifies practical computations. Finally, we demonstrate our framework through experimental validation on GP datasets representing brain connectivity and climate development. A Matlab library for relevant computations will be published at https://sites.google.com/view/antonmallasto/software. Anton Mallasto, Aasa Feragen |
NIPS | 1 |