Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Mohammad Ali Bashiri

dblp:209/4876 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Reinforcement learning · 55% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 23% Trustworthy machine learning · 12%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 11 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
imitation learning
0.512021
Distributionally Robust Imitation Learning · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › imitation learning
inverse reinforcement learning
0.512021
Distributionally Robust Imitation Learning · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › imitation learning › inverse reinforcement learning
maximum entropy inverse reinforcement learning
0.512021
Distributionally Robust Imitation Learning · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
distributionally robust optimization
0.312018
Distributionally Robust Graphical Models · NeurIPS 2018
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
graphical models
0.312018
Distributionally Robust Graphical Models · NeurIPS 2018
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › regression
ordinal regression
0.312017
Adversarial Surrogate Losses for Ordinal Regression · NIPS 2017
Machine learning › Learning theory › loss function
surrogate loss
0.312017
Adversarial Surrogate Losses for Ordinal Regression · NIPS 2017
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization › first-order methods
conditional gradient method
0.312017
Decomposition-Invariant Conditional Gradient for General Polytopes with Line Search · NIPS 2017
Mathematical optimization
continuous optimization
0.312017
Decomposition-Invariant Conditional Gradient for General Polytopes with Line Search · NIPS 2017
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
convex optimization
0.312017
Decomposition-Invariant Conditional Gradient for General Polytopes with Line Search · NIPS 2017
Mathematical optimization
frank-wolfe algorithm
0.312017
Decomposition-Invariant Conditional Gradient for General Polytopes with Line Search · NIPS 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

adversarial training · 0.6distributionally robust optimization · 0.5convex optimization · 0.5line search · 0.3away-step update · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Distributionally Robust Imitation Learning
abstract
We consider the imitation learning problem of learning a policy in a Markov Decision Process (MDP) setting where the reward function is not given, but demonstrations from experts are available. Although the goal of imitation learning is to learn a policy that produces behaviors nearly as good as the experts’ for a desired task, assumptions of consistent optimality for demonstrated behaviors are often violated in practice. Finding a policy that is distributionally robust against noisy demonstrations based on an adversarial construction potentially solves this problem by avoiding optimistic generalizations of the demonstrated data. This paper studies Distributionally Robust Imitation Learning (DRoIL) and establishes a close connection between DRoIL and Maximum Entropy Inverse Reinforcement Learning. We show that DRoIL can be seen as a framework that maximizes a generalized concept of entropy. We develop a novel approach to transform the objective function into a convex optimization problem over a polynomial number of variables for a class of loss functions that are additive over state and action spaces. Our approach lets us optimize both stationary and non-stationary policies and, unlike prevalent previous methods, it does not require repeatedly solving an inner reinforcement learning problem. We experimentally show the significant benefits of DRoIL’s new optimization method on synthetic data and a highway driving environment.
Mohammad Ali Bashiri, Brian D. Ziebart
NeurIPS1
2018 Distributionally Robust Graphical Models
abstract
In many structured prediction problems, complex relationships between variables are compactly defined using graphical structures. The most prevalent graphical prediction methods---probabilistic graphical models and large margin methods---have their own distinct strengths but also possess significant drawbacks. Conditional random fields (CRFs) are Fisher consistent, but they do not permit integration of customized loss metrics into their learning process. Large-margin models, such as structured support vector machines (SSVMs), have the flexibility to incorporate customized loss metrics, but lack Fisher consistency guarantees. We present adversarial graphical models (AGM), a distributionally robust approach for constructing a predictor that performs robustly for a class of data distributions defined using a graphical structure. Our approach enjoys both the flexibility of incorporating customized loss metrics into its design as well as the statistical guarantee of Fisher consistency. We present exact learning and prediction algorithms for AGM with time complexity similar to existing graphical models and show the practical benefits of our approach with experiments.
Rizal Fathony, Ashkan Rezaei, Mohammad Ali Bashiri, Brian D. Ziebart
NeurIPS3
2017 Decomposition-Invariant Conditional Gradient for General Polytopes with Line Search
abstract
Frank-Wolfe (FW) algorithms with linear convergence rates have recently achieved great efficiency in many applications. Garber and Meshi (2016) designed a new decomposition-invariant pairwise FW variant with favorable dependency on the domain geometry. Unfortunately, it applies only to a restricted class of polytopes and cannot achieve theoretical and practical efficiency at the same time. In this paper, we show that by employing an away-step update, similar rates can be generalized to arbitrary polytopes with strong empirical performance. A new "condition number" of the domain is introduced which allows leveraging the sparsity of the solution. We applied the method to a reformulation of SVM, and the linear convergence rate depends, for the first time, on the number of support vectors.
Mohammad Ali Bashiri
NIPS1
2017 Adversarial Surrogate Losses for Ordinal Regression
abstract
Ordinal regression seeks class label predictions when the penalty incurred for mistakes increases according to an ordering over the labels. The absolute error is a canonical example. Many existing methods for this task reduce to binary classification problems and employ surrogate losses, such as the hinge loss. We instead derive uniquely defined surrogate ordinal regression loss functions by seeking the predictor that is robust to the worst-case approximations of training data labels, subject to matching certain provided training data statistics. We demonstrate the advantages of our approach over other surrogate losses based on hinge loss approximations using UCI ordinal prediction tasks.
Rizal Fathony, Mohammad Ali Bashiri, Brian D. Ziebart
NIPS2