Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Kari Rantanen

dblp:209/4898 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
4as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 4 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
graphical models
0.312017
Learning Chordal Markov Networks via Branch and Bound · NIPS 2017
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models › markov random field
markov network structure learning
0.312017
Learning Chordal Markov Networks via Branch and Bound · NIPS 2017
Mathematical optimization
combinatorial optimization
0.312017
Learning Chordal Markov Networks via Branch and Bound · NIPS 2017
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models › structure learning
graphical model structure learning
0.112017
Learning Chordal Markov Networks via Branch and Bound · NIPS 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

integer programming · 0.6dynamic programming · 0.6branch-and-bound · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Maximal ancestral graph structure learning via exact search
abstract
Generalizing Bayesian networks, maximal ancestral graphs (MAGs) are a theoretically appealing model class for dealing with unobserved variables. Despite significant advances in developing practical exact algorithms for learning score-optimal Bayesian networks, practical exact algorithms for learning score-optimal MAGs have not been developed to-date. We develop here methodology for score-based structure learning of directed maximal ancestral graphs. In particular, we develop local score computation employing a linear Gaussian BIC score, as well as score pruning techniques, which are essential for exact structure learning approaches. Furthermore, employing dynamic programming and branch and bound, we present a first exact search algorithm that is guaranteed to find a globally optimal MAG for given local scores. The experiments show that our approach is able to find considerably higher scoring MAGs than previously proposed in-exact approaches.
Kari Rantanen, Antti Hyttinen, Matti Järvisalo
UAI1
2020 Learning Chordal Markov Networks via Stochastic Local Search
abstract
Peer reviewed
Kari Rantanen, Antti Hyttinen, Matti Järvisalo
ECAI1
2020 Discovering causal graphs with cycles and latent confounders: An exact branch-and-bound approach
Kari Rantanen, Antti Hyttinen, Matti Järvisalo
Int. J. Approx. Reason.1
2017 Learning Chordal Markov Networks via Branch and Bound
abstract
We present a new algorithmic approach for the task of finding a chordal Markov network structure that maximizes a given scoring function. The algorithm is based on branch and bound and integrates dynamic programming for both domain pruning and for obtaining strong bounds for search-space pruning. Empirically, we show that the approach dominates in terms of running times a recent integer programming approach (and thereby also a recent constraint optimization approach) for the problem. Furthermore, our algorithm scales at times further with respect to the number of variables than a state-of-the-art dynamic programming algorithm for the problem, with the potential of reaching 20 variables and at the same time circumventing the tight exponential lower bounds on memory consumption of the pure dynamic programming approach.
Kari Rantanen, Antti Hyttinen, Matti Järvisalo
NIPS1