Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Abhratanu Dutta

dblp:209/4904 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0003-4845-7117ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 40% Question answering and dialogue systems · 26% Language models and text generation · 26%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Web and social media mining · 50% Recommender systems · 50%
Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Algorithms and data structures · 46% Mathematical optimization · 30% Approximation and online algorithms · 23%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
retrieval-augmented generation
0.812024
Satyrn: A Platform for Analytics Augmented Generation · EMNLP 2024
Recommender systems › user modeling
user behavior prediction
0.712023
Gateway Entities in Problematic Trajectories · WWW 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness
0.412019
On Robustness to Adversarial Examples and Polynomial Optimization · NeurIPS 2019
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
certified robustness
0.412019
On Robustness to Adversarial Examples and Polynomial Optimization · NeurIPS 2019
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.412019
On Robustness to Adversarial Examples and Polynomial Optimization · NeurIPS 2019
Mathematical optimization › global optimization
polynomial optimization
0.412019
On Robustness to Adversarial Examples and Polynomial Optimization · NeurIPS 2019
Algorithms and data structures
clustering
0.312017
Clustering Stable Instances of Euclidean k-means · NIPS 2017
Algorithms and data structures › clustering › k-means clustering
euclidean k-means
0.312017
Clustering Stable Instances of Euclidean k-means · NIPS 2017
Machine learning › Learning theory
computational learning theory
0.112019
On Robustness to Adversarial Examples and Polynomial Optimization · NeurIPS 2019
Machine learning › Learning theory › generalization
provable learning guarantees
0.112019
On Robustness to Adversarial Examples and Polynomial Optimization · NeurIPS 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sum-of-squares · 0.8polynomial optimization · 0.8natural language generation · 0.8analytics · 0.8survival analysis · 0.7frequentist analysis · 0.7lloyd's algorithm · 0.3convex optimization · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Satyrn: A Platform for Analytics Augmented Generation
abstract
Marko Sterbentz, Cameron Barrie, Shubham Shahi, Abhratanu Dutta, Donna Hooshmand, Harper Pack, Kristian J Hammond. Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2024.
Marko Sterbentz, Cameron Barrie, Shubham Shahi, Abhratanu Dutta, Donna Hooshmand, Harper Pack, Kristian J. Hammond
EMNLP4
2023 Gateway Entities in Problematic Trajectories
abstract
Social media platforms like Facebook and YouTube connect people with communities that reflect their own values and experiences. People discover new communities either organically or through algorithmic recommendations based on their interests and preferences. We study online journeys users take through these communities, focusing particularly on ones that may lead to problematic outcomes. In particular, we propose and explore the concept of gateways, namely, entities associated with a higher likelihood of subsequent engagement with problematic content. We show, via a real-world application on Facebook groups, that a simple definition of gateway entities can be leveraged to reduce exposure to problematic content by 1% without any adverse impact on user engagement metrics. Motivated by this finding, we propose several formal definitions of gateways, via both frequentist and survival analysis methods, and evaluate their efficacy in predicting user behavior through offline experiments. Frequentist, duration-insensitive methods predict future harmful engagements with an 0.64–0.83 AUC, while survival analysis methods improve this to 0.72–0.90 AUC.
Xi Leslie Chen, Abhratanu Dutta, Sindhu Kiranmai Ernala, Stratis Ioannidis, Shankar Kalyanaraman, Israel Nir, Udi Weinsberg
WWW2
2019 On Robustness to Adversarial Examples and Polynomial Optimization
abstract
We study the design of computationally efficient algorithms with provable guarantees, that are robust to adversarial (test time) perturbations. While there has been an explosion of recent work on this topic due to its connections to test time robustness of deep networks, there is limited theoretical understanding of several basic questions like (i) when and how can one design provably robust learning algorithms? (ii) what is the price of achieving robustness to adversarial examples in a computationally efficient manner? The main contribution of this work is to exhibit a strong connection between achieving robustness to adversarial examples, and a rich class of polynomial optimization problems, thereby making progress on the above questions. In particular, we leverage this connection to (a) design computationally efficient robust algorithms with provable guarantees for a large class of hypothesis, namely linear classifiers and degree-2 polynomial threshold functions~(PTFs), (b) give a precise characterization of the price of achieving robustness in a computationally efficient manner for these classes, (c) design efficient algorithms to certify robustness and generate adversarial attacks in a principled manner for 2-layer neural networks. We empirically demonstrate the effectiveness of these attacks on real data.
Pranjal Awasthi, Abhratanu Dutta, Aravindan Vijayaraghavan
NeurIPS2
2017 Clustering Stable Instances of Euclidean k-means
abstract
The Euclidean k-means problem is arguably the most widely-studied clustering problem in machine learning. While the k-means objective is NP-hard in the worst-case, practitioners have enjoyed remarkable success in applying heuristics like Lloyd's algorithm for this problem. To address this disconnect, we study the following question: what properties of real-world instances will enable us to design efficient algorithms and prove guarantees for finding the optimal clustering? We consider a natural notion called additive perturbation stability that we believe captures many practical instances of Euclidean k-means clustering. Stable instances have unique optimal k-means solutions that does not change even when each point is perturbed a little (in Euclidean distance). This captures the property that k-means optimal solution should be tolerant to measurement errors and uncertainty in the points. We design efficient algorithms that provably recover the optimal clustering for instances that are additive perturbation stable. When the instance has some additional separation, we can design a simple, efficient algorithm with provable guarantees that is also robust to outliers. We also complement these results by studying the amount of stability in real datasets, and demonstrating that our algorithm performs well on these benchmark datasets.
Aravindan Vijayaraghavan, Abhratanu Dutta
NIPS2