David A. Klindt

dblp:209/4909 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
12ranked-venue papers
2as first author
10since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 11 · 2 first-author · 9 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
9 papers
Representation and self-supervised learning · 34% Trustworthy machine learning · 22% Deep learning architectures and training · 9%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Information theory · 100%

Topics — the 23 heaviest of 28, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
1.622025
Compute Optimal Inference and Provable Amortisation Gap in Sparse Autoencoders · ICML 2025
Measuring Per-Unit Interpretability at Scale Without Humans · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
cross-entropy optimization
0.912025
Cross-Entropy Is All You Need To Invert the Data Generating Process · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
feature discovery
0.912025
Compute Optimal Inference and Provable Amortisation Gap in Sparse Autoencoders · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › causal representation learning › identifiability
identifiability of representations
0.912025
Cross-Entropy Is All You Need To Invert the Data Generating Process · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation analysis
linear representation hypothesis
0.912025
Cross-Entropy Is All You Need To Invert the Data Generating Process · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › mechanistic interpretability
sparse autoencoder
0.912025
Compute Optimal Inference and Provable Amortisation Gap in Sparse Autoencoders · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › sparse neural network
sparse inference
0.912025
Compute Optimal Inference and Provable Amortisation Gap in Sparse Autoencoders · ICML 2025
Information theory › signal processing
compressed sensing
0.912025
Compute Optimal Inference and Provable Amortisation Gap in Sparse Autoencoders · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
mechanistic interpretability
0.812024
Measuring Per-Unit Interpretability at Scale Without Humans · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Learning theory
neural network theory
0.812024
Get rich quick: exact solutions reveal how unbalanced initializations promote rapid feature learning · NeurIPS 2024
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
spatial navigation
0.812024
Global Distortions from Local Rewards: Neural Coding Strategies in Path-Integrating Neural Systems · NeurIPS 2024
Bioinformatics and computational biology
computational neuroscience
0.812024
Global Distortions from Local Rewards: Neural Coding Strategies in Path-Integrating Neural Systems · NeurIPS 2024
Bioinformatics and computational biology › computational neuroscience › spatial navigation
grid cell modeling
0.812024
Global Distortions from Local Rewards: Neural Coding Strategies in Path-Integrating Neural Systems · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
ensemble learning
0.712023
Understanding Neural Coding on Latent Manifolds by Sharing Features and Dividing Ensembles · ICLR 2023
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › shared representation
feature sharing
0.712023
Understanding Neural Coding on Latent Manifolds by Sharing Features and Dividing Ensembles · ICLR 2023
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › computational neuroscience
neural coding
0.712023
Understanding Neural Coding on Latent Manifolds by Sharing Features and Dividing Ensembles · ICLR 2023
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › minimax optimization
adversarial optimization
0.512021
Removing Inter-Experimental Variability from Functional Data in Systems Neuroscience · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
disentangled representation learning
0.512021
Towards Nonlinear Disentanglement in Natural Data with Temporal Sparse Coding · ICLR 2021
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
domain adaptation
0.512021
Removing Inter-Experimental Variability from Functional Data in Systems Neuroscience · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › convolutional neural network
receptive field modeling
0.312017
Neural system identification for large populations separating "what" and "where" · NIPS 2017
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › blind source separation › independent component analysis
nonlinear ICA
0.312025
Cross-Entropy Is All You Need To Invert the Data Generating Process · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › computational neuroscience › neural coding
neural population coding
0.212024
Global Distortions from Local Rewards: Neural Coding Strategies in Path-Integrating Neural Systems · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
training dynamics
0.212024
Get rich quick: exact solutions reveal how unbalanced initializations promote rapid feature learning · NeurIPS 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sparse coding · 2.2compressed sensing theory · 1.7path-integrating recurrent neural networks · 1.5nonlinear independent component analysis · 0.9cross-entropy minimization · 0.9interventional psychophysics · 0.8exact solutions for linear networks · 0.8conserved quantities analysis · 0.8automated interpretability measurement · 0.8ensemble learning · 0.7domain adaptation · 0.5adversarial optimization · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Cross-Entropy Is All You Need To Invert the Data Generating Process
abstract
Supervised learning has become a cornerstone of modern machine learning, yet a comprehensive theory explaining its effectiveness remains elusive. Empirical phenomena, such as neural analogy-making and the linear representation hypothesis, suggest that supervised models can learn interpretable factors of variation in a linear fashion. Recent advances in self-supervised learning, particularly nonlinear Independent Component Analysis, have shown that these methods can recover latent structures by inverting the data generating process. We extend these identifiability results to parametric instance discrimination, then show how insights transfer to the ubiquitous setting of supervised learning with cross-entropy minimization. We prove that even in standard classification tasks, models learn representations of ground-truth factors of variation up to a linear transformation under a certain DGP. We corroborate our theoretical contribution with a series of empirical studies. First, using simulated data matching our theoretical assumptions, we demonstrate successful disentanglement of latent factors. Second, we show that on DisLib, a widely-used disentanglement benchmark, simple classification tasks recover latent structures up to linear transformations. Finally, we reveal that models trained on ImageNet encode representations that permit linear decoding of proxy factors of variation. Together, our theoretical findings and experiments offer a compelling explanation for recent observations of linear representations, such as superposition in neural networks. This work takes a significant step toward a cohesive theory that accounts for the unreasonable effectiveness of supervised learning.
Patrik Reizinger, Alice Bizeul, Attila Juhos, Julia E. Vogt, Randall Balestriero, Wieland Brendel, David A. Klindt
ICLR7
2025 Compute Optimal Inference and Provable Amortisation Gap in Sparse Autoencoders
abstract
A recent line of work has shown promise in using sparse autoencoders (SAEs) to uncover interpretable features in neural network representations. However, the simple linear-nonlinear encoding mechanism in SAEs limits their ability to perform accurate sparse inference. Using compressed sensing theory, we prove that an SAE encoder is inherently insufficient for accurate sparse inference, even in solvable cases. We then decouple encoding and decoding processes to empirically explore conditions where more sophisticated sparse inference methods outperform traditional SAE encoders. Our results reveal substantial performance gains with minimal compute increases in correct inference of sparse codes. We demonstrate this generalises to SAEs applied to large language models, where more expressive encoders achieve greater interpretability. This work opens new avenues for understanding neural network representations and analysing large language model activations.
Charles O'Neill, Alim Gumran, David A. Klindt
ICML3
2025 AI-Generated Video Detection via Perceptual Straightening
abstract
The rapid advancement of generative AI enables highly realistic synthetic video, posing significant challenges for content authentication and raising urgent concerns about misuse. Existing detection methods often struggle with generalization and capturing subtle temporal inconsistencies. We propose $ReStraV$ ($Re$presentation $Stra$ightening for $V$ideo), a novel approach to distinguish natural from AI-generated videos. Inspired by the ``perceptual straightening'' hypothesis—which suggests real-world video trajectories become more straight in neural representation domain—we analyze deviations from this expected geometric property. Using a pre-trained self-supervised vision transformer (DINOv2), we quantify the temporal curvature and stepwise distance in the model's representation domain. We aggregate statistical and signals descriptors of these measures for each video and train a classifier. Our analysis shows that AI-generated videos exhibit significantly different curvature and distance patterns compared to real videos. A lightweight classifier achieves state-of-the-art detection performance (e.g., $97.17$ % accuracy and $98.63$ % AUROC on the VidProM benchmark, substantially outperforming existing image- and video-based methods. ReStraV is computationally efficient, it is offering a low-cost and effective detection solution. This work provides new insights into using neural representation geometry for AI-generated video detection.
Christian Internò, Robert Geirhos, Markus Olhofer, Sunny Liu, Barbara Hammer, David A. Klindt
NeurIPS6
2024 Global Distortions from Local Rewards: Neural Coding Strategies in Path-Integrating Neural Systems
abstract
Grid cells in the mammalian brain are fundamental to spatial navigation, and therefore crucial to how animals perceive and interact with their environment. Traditionally, grid cells are thought support path integration through highly symmetric hexagonal lattice firing patterns. However, recent findings show that their firing patterns become distorted in the presence of significant spatial landmarks such as rewarded locations. This introduces a novel perspective of dynamic, subjective, and action-relevant interactions between spatial representations and environmental cues. Here, we propose a practical and theoretical framework to quantify and explain these interactions. To this end, we train path-integrating recurrent neural networks (piRNNs) on a spatial navigation task, whose goal is to predict the agent's position with a special focus on rewarded locations. Grid-like neurons naturally emerge from the training of piRNNs, which allows us to investigate how the two aspects of the task, space and reward, are integrated in their firing patterns. We find that geometry, but not topology, of the grid cell population code becomes distorted. Surprisingly, these distortions are global in the firing patterns of the grid cells despite local changes in the reward. Our results indicate that after training with location-specific reward information, the preserved representational topology supports successful path integration, whereas the emergent heterogeneity in individual responses due to global distortions may encode dynamically changing environmental cues. By bridging the gap between computational models and the biological reality of spatial navigation under reward information, we offer new insights into how neural systems prioritize environmental landmarks in their spatial navigation code.
Francisco D. Acosta, Fatih Dinc, William Redman, Manu S. Madhav, David A. Klindt, Nina Miolane
NeurIPS5
2024 Get rich quick: exact solutions reveal how unbalanced initializations promote rapid feature learning
abstract
While the impressive performance of modern neural networks is often attributed to their capacity to efficiently extract task-relevant features from data, the mechanisms underlying this *rich feature learning regime* remain elusive, with much of our theoretical understanding stemming from the opposing *lazy regime*. In this work, we derive exact solutions to a minimal model that transitions between lazy and rich learning, precisely elucidating how unbalanced *layer-specific* initialization variances and learning rates determine the degree of feature learning. Our analysis reveals that they conspire to influence the learning regime through a set of conserved quantities that constrain and modify the geometry of learning trajectories in parameter and function space. We extend our analysis to more complex linear models with multiple neurons, outputs, and layers and to shallow nonlinear networks with piecewise linear activation functions. In linear networks, rapid feature learning only occurs from balanced initializations, where all layers learn at similar speeds. While in nonlinear networks, unbalanced initializations that promote faster learning in earlier layers can accelerate rich learning. Through a series of experiments, we provide evidence that this unbalanced rich regime drives feature learning in deep finite-width networks, promotes interpretability of early layers in CNNs, reduces the sample complexity of learning hierarchical data, and decreases the time to grokking in modular arithmetic. Our theory motivates further exploration of unbalanced initializations to enhance efficient feature learning.
Daniel Kunin, Allan Raventós, Clémentine C. J. Dominé, Feng Chen 0046, David A. Klindt, Andrew M. Saxe, Surya Ganguli
NeurIPS5
2024 Measuring Per-Unit Interpretability at Scale Without Humans
abstract
In today’s era, whatever we can measure at scale, we can optimize. So far, measuring the interpretability of units in deep neural networks (DNNs) for computer vision still requires direct human evaluation and is not scalable. As a result, the inner workings of DNNs remain a mystery despite the remarkable progress we have seen in their applications. In this work, we introduce the first scalable method to measure the per-unit interpretability in vision DNNs. This method does not require any human evaluations, yet its prediction correlates well with existing human interpretability measurements. We validate its predictive power through an interventional human psychophysics study. We demonstrate the usefulness of this measure by performing previously infeasible experiments: (1) A large-scale interpretability analysis across more than 70 million units from 835 computer vision models, and (2) an extensive analysis of how units transform during training. We find an anticorrelation between a model's downstream classification performance and per-unit interpretability, which is also observable during model training. Furthermore, we see that a layer's location and width influence its interpretability.
Roland S. Zimmermann, David A. Klindt, Wieland Brendel
NeurIPS2
2023 Understanding Neural Coding on Latent Manifolds by Sharing Features and Dividing Ensembles
Martin Bjerke, Lukas Schott, Kristopher T. Jensen, Claudia Battistin, David A. Klindt, Benjamin A. Dunn
ICLR5
2023 Efficient coding of natural scenes improves neural system identification
abstract
Neural system identification aims at learning the response function of neurons to arbitrary stimuli using experimentally recorded data, but typically does not leverage normative principles such as efficient coding of natural environments. Visual systems, however, have evolved to efficiently process input from the natural environment. Here, we present a normative network regularization for system identification models by incorporating, as a regularizer, the efficient coding hypothesis, which states that neural response properties of sensory representations are strongly shaped by the need to preserve most of the stimulus information with limited resources. Using this approach, we explored if a system identification model can be improved by sharing its convolutional filters with those of an autoencoder which aims to efficiently encode natural stimuli. To this end, we built a hybrid model to predict the responses of retinal neurons to noise stimuli. This approach did not only yield a higher performance than the "stand-alone" system identification model, it also produced more biologically plausible filters, meaning that they more closely resembled neural representation in early visual systems. We found these results applied to retinal responses to different artificial stimuli and across model architectures. Moreover, our normatively regularized model performed particularly well in predicting responses of direction-of-motion sensitive retinal neurons. The benefit of natural scene statistics became marginal, however, for predicting the responses to natural movies. In summary, our results indicate that efficiently encoding environmental inputs can improve system identification models, at least for noise stimuli, and point to the benefit of probing the visual system with naturalistic stimuli.
Yongrong Qiu, David A. Klindt, Klaudia P. Szatko, Dominic Gonschorek, Larissa Höfling, Timm Schubert, Laura Busse, Matthias Bethge, Thomas Euler
PLoS Comput. Biol.2
2021 Towards Nonlinear Disentanglement in Natural Data with Temporal Sparse Coding
David A. Klindt, Lukas Schott, Yash Sharma 0001, Ivan Ustyuzhaninov, Wieland Brendel, Matthias Bethge, Dylan M. Paiton
ICLR1
2021 Removing Inter-Experimental Variability from Functional Data in Systems Neuroscience
abstract
Integrating data from multiple experiments is common practice in systems neuroscience but it requires inter-experimental variability to be negligible compared to the biological signal of interest. This requirement is rarely fulfilled; systematic changes between experiments can drastically affect the outcome of complex analysis pipelines. Modern machine learning approaches designed to adapt models across multiple data domains offer flexible ways of removing inter-experimental variability where classical statistical methods often fail. While applications of these methods have been mostly limited to single-cell genomics, in this work, we develop a theoretical framework for domain adaptation in systems neuroscience. We implement this in an adversarial optimization scheme that removes inter-experimental variability while preserving the biological signal. We compare our method to previous approaches on a large-scale dataset of two-photon imaging recordings of retinal bipolar cell responses to visual stimuli. This dataset provides a unique benchmark as it contains biological signal from well-defined cell types that is obscured by large inter-experimental variability. In a supervised setting, we compare the generalization performance of cell type classifiers across experiments, which we validate with anatomical cell type distributions from electron microscopy data. In an unsupervised setting, we remove inter-experimental variability from the data which can then be fed into arbitrary downstream analyses. In both settings, we find that our method achieves the best trade-off between removing inter-experimental variability and preserving biological signal. Thus, we offer a flexible approach to remove inter-experimental variability and integrate datasets across experiments in systems neuroscience. Code available at https://github.com/eulerlab/rave.
Dominic Gonschorek, Larissa Höfling, Klaudia P. Szatko, Katrin Franke, Timm Schubert, Benjamin A. Dunn, Philipp Berens, David A. Klindt, Thomas Euler
NeurIPS8
2020 System Identification with Biophysical Constraints: A Circuit Model of the Inner Retina
abstract
Visual processing in the retina has been studied in great detail at all levels such that a comprehensive picture of the retina's cell types and the many neural circuits they form is emerging. However, the currently best performing models of retinal function are black-box CNN models which are agnostic to such biological knowledge. In particular, these models typically neglect the role of the many inhibitory circuits involving amacrine cells and the biophysical mechanisms underlying synaptic release. Here, we present a computational model of temporal processing in the inner retina, including inhibitory feedback circuits and realistic synaptic release mechanisms. Fit to the responses of bipolar cells, the model generalized well to new stimuli including natural movie sequences, performing on par with or better than a benchmark black-box model. In pharmacology experiments, the model replicated in silico the effect of blocking specific amacrine cell populations with high fidelity, indicating that it had learned key circuit functions. Also, more in depth comparisons showed that connectivity patterns learned by the model were well matched to connectivity patterns extracted from connectomics data. Thus, our model provides a biologically interpretable data-driven account of temporal processing in the inner retina, filling the gap between purely black-box and detailed biophysical modeling.
Cornelius Schröder, David A. Klindt, Sarah Strauß, Katrin Franke, Matthias Bethge, Thomas Euler, Philipp Berens
NeurIPS2
2017 Neural system identification for large populations separating "what" and "where"
abstract
Neuroscientists classify neurons into different types that perform similar computations at different locations in the visual field. Traditional methods for neural system identification do not capitalize on this separation of “what” and “where”. Learning deep convolutional feature spaces that are shared among many neurons provides an exciting path forward, but the architectural design needs to account for data limitations: While new experimental techniques enable recordings from thousands of neurons, experimental time is limited so that one can sample only a small fraction of each neuron's response space. Here, we show that a major bottleneck for fitting convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to neural data is the estimation of the individual receptive field locations – a problem that has been scratched only at the surface thus far. We propose a CNN architecture with a sparse readout layer factorizing the spatial (where) and feature (what) dimensions. Our network scales well to thousands of neurons and short recordings and can be trained end-to-end. We evaluate this architecture on ground-truth data to explore the challenges and limitations of CNN-based system identification. Moreover, we show that our network model outperforms current state-of-the art system identification models of mouse primary visual cortex.
David A. Klindt, Alexander S. Ecker, Thomas Euler, Matthias Bethge
NIPS1