Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jack Goetz

dblp:209/4946 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Learning theory · 62% Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 38%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 50% Algorithms and data structures · 50%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Algorithms and data structures › analysis of algorithms
random trees
0.312018
Active Learning for Non-Parametric Regression Using Purely Random Trees · NeurIPS 2018
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph algorithms
tree algorithms
0.312018
Active Learning for Non-Parametric Regression Using Purely Random Trees · NeurIPS 2018
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › ensemble learning
boosting
0.312017
Online multiclass boosting · NIPS 2017
Machine learning › Learning theory
online learning
0.312017
Online multiclass boosting · NIPS 2017
Machine learning › Learning theory
minimax optimality
0.112018
Active Learning for Non-Parametric Regression Using Purely Random Trees · NeurIPS 2018
Machine learning › Learning theory › classification
multiclass classification
0.112017
Online multiclass boosting · NIPS 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

mondrian trees · 0.7active sampling · 0.7weak learning condition · 0.3adaptive boosting · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 Active Learning for Non-Parametric Regression Using Purely Random Trees
abstract
Active learning is the task of using labelled data to select additional points to label, with the goal of fitting the most accurate model with a fixed budget of labelled points. In binary classification active learning is known to produce faster rates than passive learning for a broad range of settings. However in regression restrictive structure and tailored methods were previously needed to obtain theoretically superior performance. In this paper we propose an intuitive tree based active learning algorithm for non-parametric regression with provable improvement over random sampling. When implemented with Mondrian Trees our algorithm is tuning parameter free, consistent and minimax optimal for Lipschitz functions.
Jack Goetz, Ambuj Tewari, Paul M. Zimmerman
NeurIPS1
2017 Online multiclass boosting
abstract
Recent work has extended the theoretical analysis of boosting algorithms to multiclass problems and to online settings. However, the multiclass extension is in the batch setting and the online extensions only consider binary classification. We fill this gap in the literature by defining, and justifying, a weak learning condition for online multiclass boosting. This condition leads to an optimal boosting algorithm that requires the minimal number of weak learners to achieve a certain accuracy. Additionally, we propose an adaptive algorithm which is near optimal and enjoys an excellent performance on real data due to its adaptive property.
Young Hun Jung, Jack Goetz, Ambuj Tewari
NIPS2