Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
John T. Halloran
dblp:209/4956
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 4 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
4 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Optimization for machine learning · 26% Efficient and distributed learning · 26% Image recognition and object detection · 26% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › proteomics
tandem mass spectrometry |
0.9 | 3 | 2018 | Learning Concave Conditional Likelihood Models for Improved Analysis of Tandem Mass Spectra · NeurIPS 2018 Gradients of Generative Models for Improved Discriminative Analysis of Tandem Mass Spectra · NIPS 2017 Faster and more accurate graphical model identification of tandem mass spectra using trellises · Bioinform. 2016 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › proteomics
peptide identification |
0.6 | 2 | 2018 | Learning Concave Conditional Likelihood Models for Improved Analysis of Tandem Mass Spectra · NeurIPS 2018 Gradients of Generative Models for Improved Discriminative Analysis of Tandem Mass Spectra · NIPS 2017 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › proteomics
protein identification |
0.6 | 2 | 2018 | Learning Concave Conditional Likelihood Models for Improved Analysis of Tandem Mass Spectra · NeurIPS 2018 Gradients of Generative Models for Improved Discriminative Analysis of Tandem Mass Spectra · NIPS 2017 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
convex optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | GPU-Accelerated Primal Learning for Extremely Fast Large-Scale Classification · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › hardware acceleration
GPU training |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | GPU-Accelerated Primal Learning for Extremely Fast Large-Scale Classification · NeurIPS 2020 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › image classification › large-scale image classification
large-scale classification |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | GPU-Accelerated Primal Learning for Extremely Fast Large-Scale Classification · NeurIPS 2020 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
proteomics |
0.4 | 2 | 2020 | Faster and more accurate graphical model identification of tandem mass spectra using trellises · Bioinform. 2016 GPU-Accelerated Primal Learning for Extremely Fast Large-Scale Classification · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models › bayesian network
dynamic bayesian network |
0.2 | 2 | 2018 | Learning Concave Conditional Likelihood Models for Improved Analysis of Tandem Mass Spectra · NeurIPS 2018 Gradients of Generative Models for Improved Discriminative Analysis of Tandem Mass Spectra · NIPS 2017 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
graphical models |
0.2 | 2 | 2018 | Learning Concave Conditional Likelihood Models for Improved Analysis of Tandem Mass Spectra · NeurIPS 2018 Gradients of Generative Models for Improved Discriminative Analysis of Tandem Mass Spectra · NIPS 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
trust region newton · 0.9multithreading · 0.9GPU optimization · 0.9dynamic bayesian network · 0.8message passing · 0.7maximum likelihood estimation · 0.7convex virtual emissions · 0.7max-product inference · 0.6gradient ascent · 0.6fisher kernel · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | GPU-Accelerated Primal Learning for Extremely Fast Large-Scale ClassificationabstractOne of the most efficient methods to solve L2 -regularized primal problems, such as logistic regression and linear support vector machine (SVM) classification, is the widely used trust region Newton algorithm, TRON. While TRON has recently been shown to enjoy substantial speedups on shared-memory multi-core systems, exploiting graphical processing units (GPUs) to speed up the method is significantly more difficult, owing to the highly complex and heavily sequential nature of the algorithm. In this work, we show that using judicious GPU-optimization principles, TRON training time for different losses and feature representations may be drastically reduced. For sparse feature sets, we show that using GPUs to train logistic regression classifiers in LIBLINEAR is up to an order-of-magnitude faster than solely using multithreading. For dense feature sets–which impose far more stringent memory constraints–we show that GPUs substantially reduce the lengthy SVM learning times required for state-of-the-art proteomics analysis, leading to dramatic improvements over recently proposed speedups. Furthermore, we show how GPU speedups may be mixed with multithreading to enable such speedups when the dataset is too large for GPU memory requirements; on a massive dense proteomics dataset of nearly a quarter-billion data instances, these mixed-architecture speedups reduce SVM analysis time from over half a week to less than a single day while using limited GPU memory. John T. Halloran, David M. Rocke |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2018 | Learning Concave Conditional Likelihood Models for Improved Analysis of Tandem Mass SpectraabstractThe most widely used technology to identify the proteins present in a complex biological sample is tandem mass spectrometry, which quickly produces a large collection of spectra representative of the peptides (i.e., protein subsequences) present in the original sample. In this work, we greatly expand the parameter learning capabilities of a dynamic Bayesian network (DBN) peptide-scoring algorithm, Didea, by deriving emission distributions for which its conditional log-likelihood scoring function remains concave. We show that this class of emission distributions, called Convex Virtual Emissions (CVEs), naturally generalizes the log-sum-exp function while rendering both maximum likelihood estimation and conditional maximum likelihood estimation concave for a wide range of Bayesian networks. Utilizing CVEs in Didea allows efficient learning of a large number of parameters while ensuring global convergence, in stark contrast to Didea’s previous parameter learning framework (which could only learn a single parameter using a costly grid search) and other trainable models (which only ensure convergence to local optima). The newly trained scoring function substantially outperforms the state-of-the-art in both scoring function accuracy and downstream Fisher kernel analysis. Furthermore, we significantly improve Didea’s runtime performance through successive optimizations to its message passing schedule and derive explicit connections between Didea’s new concave score and related MS/MS scoring functions. John T. Halloran, David M. Rocke |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2017 | Gradients of Generative Models for Improved Discriminative Analysis of Tandem Mass SpectraabstractTandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) is a high-throughput technology used to identify the proteins in a complex biological sample, such as a drop of blood. A collection of spectra is generated at the output of the process, each spectrum of which is representative of a peptide (protein subsequence) present in the original complex sample. In this work, we leverage the log-likelihood gradients of generative models to improve the identification of such spectra. In particular, we show that the gradient of a recently proposed dynamic Bayesian network (DBN) may be naturally employed by a kernel-based discriminative classifier. The resulting Fisher kernel substantially improves upon recent attempts to combine generative and discriminative models for post-processing analysis, outperforming all other methods on the evaluated datasets. We extend the improved accuracy offered by the Fisher kernel framework to other search algorithms by introducing Theseus, a DBN representating a large number of widely used MS/MS scoring functions. Furthermore, with gradient ascent and max-product inference at hand, we use Theseus to learn model parameters without any supervision. John T. Halloran, David M. Rocke |
NIPS | 1 |
| 2016 | Faster and more accurate graphical model identification of tandem mass spectra using trellisesabstractUNLABELLED: Tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) is the dominant high throughput technology for identifying and quantifying proteins in complex biological samples. Analysis of the tens of thousands of fragmentation spectra produced by an MS/MS experiment begins by assigning to each observed spectrum the peptide that is hypothesized to be responsible for generating the spectrum. This assignment is typically done by searching each spectrum against a database of peptides. To our knowledge, all existing MS/MS search engines compute scores individually between a given observed spectrum and each possible candidate peptide from the database. In this work, we use a trellis, a data structure capable of jointly representing a large set of candidate peptides, to avoid redundantly recomputing common sub-computations among different candidates. We show how trellises may be used to significantly speed up existing scoring algorithms, and we theoretically quantify the expected speedup afforded by trellises. Furthermore, we demonstrate that compact trellis representations of whole sets of peptides enables efficient discriminative learning of a dynamic Bayesian network for spectrum identification, leading to greatly improved spectrum identification accuracy. CONTACT: [email protected] or [email protected] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Shengjie Wang 0001, John T. Halloran, Jeff A. Bilmes, William Stafford Noble |
Bioinform. | 2 |
| 2014 | Learning Peptide-Spectrum Alignment Models for Tandem Mass Spectrometry
John T. Halloran, Jeff A. Bilmes, William Stafford Noble |
UAI | 1 |
| 2012 | Spectrum Identification using a Dynamic Bayesian Network Model of Tandem Mass Spectra
Ajit P. Singh, John T. Halloran, Jeff A. Bilmes, Katrin Kirchhoff, William Stafford Noble |
UAI | 2 |