Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Benjamin Stucky

dblp:209/6680 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Learning theory · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Learning theory
high-dimensional regression
0.312017
Sharp Oracle Inequalities for Square Root Regularization · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017
Machine learning › Learning theory › excess risk bounds
oracle inequality
0.312017
Sharp Oracle Inequalities for Square Root Regularization · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017
Mathematical optimization › regularization
structured sparsity
0.112017
Sharp Oracle Inequalities for Square Root Regularization · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

square-root lasso · 0.6square root SLOPE · 0.6karush-kuhn-tucker conditions · 0.6group square root LASSO · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 Sharp Oracle Inequalities for Square Root Regularization
abstract
We study a set of regularization methods for high-dimensional linear regression models. These penalized estimators have the square root of the residual sum of squared errors as loss function, and any weakly decomposable norm as penalty function. This fit measure is chosen because of its property that the estimator does not depend on the unknown standard deviation of the noise. On the other hand, a generalized weakly decomposable norm penalty is very useful in being able to deal with different underlying sparsity structures. We can choose a different sparsity inducing norm depending on how we want to interpret the unknown parameter vector $\beta$. Structured sparsity norms, as defined in Micchelli et al. (2010), are special cases of weakly decomposable norms, therefore we also include the square root LASSO (Belloni et al., 2011), the group square root LASSO (Bunea et al., 2014) and a new method called the square root SLOPE (in a similar fashion to the SLOPE from Bogdan et al. 2015). For this collection of estimators our results provide sharp oracle inequalities with the Karush-Kuhn-Tucker conditions. We discuss some examples of estimators. Based on a simulation we illustrate some advantages of the square root SLOPE.
Benjamin Stucky, Sara A. van de Geer
J. Mach. Learn. Res.1