Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Anupama Jha

dblp:209/7336 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0003-3029-2086ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › epigenomics
chromatin conformation analysis
0.812024
Enhancing Hi-C contact matrices for loop detection with Capricorn: a multiview diffusion model · Bioinform. 2024
Bioinformatics and computational biology › transcriptomics › alternative splicing analysis
alternative splicing prediction
0.312017
Integrative deep models for alternative splicing · Bioinform. 2017
Bioinformatics and computational biology › epigenomics › chromatin interaction analysis
chromatin loop calling
0.212024
Enhancing Hi-C contact matrices for loop detection with Capricorn: a multiview diffusion model · Bioinform. 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

multi-view learning · 0.8diffusion model · 0.8transfer learning · 0.3deep neural network · 0.3bayesian network · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Enhancing Hi-C contact matrices for loop detection with Capricorn: a multiview diffusion model
abstract
MOTIVATION: High-resolution Hi-C contact matrices reveal the detailed three-dimensional architecture of the genome, but high-coverage experimental Hi-C data are expensive to generate. Simultaneously, chromatin structure analyses struggle with extremely sparse contact matrices. To address this problem, computational methods to enhance low-coverage contact matrices have been developed, but existing methods are largely based on resolution enhancement methods for natural images and hence often employ models that do not distinguish between biologically meaningful contacts, such as loops and other stochastic contacts. RESULTS: We present Capricorn, a machine learning model for Hi-C resolution enhancement that incorporates small-scale chromatin features as additional views of the input Hi-C contact matrix and leverages a diffusion probability model backbone to generate a high-coverage matrix. We show that Capricorn outperforms the state of the art in a cross-cell-line setting, improving on existing methods by 17% in mean squared error and 26% in F1 score for chromatin loop identification from the generated high-coverage data. We also demonstrate that Capricorn performs well in the cross-chromosome setting and cross-chromosome, cross-cell-line setting, improving the downstream loop F1 score by 14% relative to existing methods. We further show that our multiview idea can also be used to improve several existing methods, HiCARN and HiCNN, indicating the wide applicability of this approach. Finally, we use DNA sequence to validate discovered loops and find that the fraction of CTCF-supported loops from Capricorn is similar to those identified from the high-coverage data. Capricorn is a powerful Hi-C resolution enhancement method that enables scientists to find chromatin features that cannot be identified in the low-coverage contact matrix. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Implementation of Capricorn and source code for reproducing all figures in this paper are available at https://github.com/CHNFTQ/Capricorn.
Tangqi Fang, Yifeng Liu 0004, Addie Woicik, Minsi Lu, Anupama Jha, Xiao Wang 0013, Gang Li 0034, Borislav H. Hristov, Zixuan Liu 0001, William Stafford Noble, Sheng Wang 0012
Bioinform.5
2017 Integrative deep models for alternative splicing
abstract
MOTIVATION: Advancements in sequencing technologies have highlighted the role of alternative splicing (AS) in increasing transcriptome complexity. This role of AS, combined with the relation of aberrant splicing to malignant states, motivated two streams of research, experimental and computational. The first involves a myriad of techniques such as RNA-Seq and CLIP-Seq to identify splicing regulators and their putative targets. The second involves probabilistic models, also known as splicing codes, which infer regulatory mechanisms and predict splicing outcome directly from genomic sequence. To date, these models have utilized only expression data. In this work, we address two related challenges: Can we improve on previous models for AS outcome prediction and can we integrate additional sources of data to improve predictions for AS regulatory factors. RESULTS: We perform a detailed comparison of two previous modeling approaches, Bayesian and Deep Neural networks, dissecting the confounding effects of datasets and target functions. We then develop a new target function for AS prediction in exon skipping events and show it significantly improves model accuracy. Next, we develop a modeling framework that leverages transfer learning to incorporate CLIP-Seq, knockdown and over expression experiments, which are inherently noisy and suffer from missing values. Using several datasets involving key splice factors in mouse brain, muscle and heart we demonstrate both the prediction improvements and biological insights offered by our new models. Overall, the framework we propose offers a scalable integrative solution to improve splicing code modeling as vast amounts of relevant genomic data become available. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Code and data available at: majiq.biociphers.org/jha_et_al_2017/. CONTACT: [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Anupama Jha, Matthew R. Gazzara, Yoseph Barash
Bioinform.1