Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Silvia Liu

dblp:209/7428 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-1840-9520ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis › gene expression meta-analysis
differential expression meta-analysis
0.412019
MetaOmics: analysis pipeline and browser-based software suite for transcriptomic meta-analysis · Bioinform. 2019
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
gene co-expression analysis
0.312017
Meta-analytic framework for liquid association · Bioinform. 2017
Bioinformatics and computational biology
statistical genetics
0.312017
Meta-analytic framework for liquid association · Bioinform. 2017
Bioinformatics and computational biology › functional genomics › functional enrichment analysis
pathway enrichment analysis
0.112019
MetaOmics: analysis pipeline and browser-based software suite for transcriptomic meta-analysis · Bioinform. 2019
Bioinformatics and computational biology
transcriptomics
0.112017
Meta-analytic framework for liquid association · Bioinform. 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

meta-analysis pipeline · 0.4meta-analysis · 0.3bootstrap filtering · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Comprehensive evaluation and practical guideline of gating methods for high-dimensional cytometry data: manual gating, unsupervised clustering, and auto-gating
abstract
Cytometry is an advanced technique for simultaneously identifying and quantifying many cell surface and intracellular proteins at a single-cell resolution. Analyzing high-dimensional cytometry data involves identifying and quantifying cell populations based on their marker expressions. This study provided a quantitative review and comparison of various ways to phenotype cellular populations within the cytometry data, including manual gating, unsupervised clustering, and supervised auto-gating. Six datasets from diverse species and sample types were included in the study, and manual gating with two hierarchical layers was used as the truth for evaluation. For manual gating, results from five researchers were compared to illustrate the gating consistency among different raters. For unsupervised clustering, 23 tools were quantitatively compared in terms of accuracy with the truth and computing cost. While no method outperformed all others, several tools, including PAC-MAN, CCAST, FlowSOM, flowClust, and DEPECHE, generally demonstrated strong performance. For supervised auto-gating methods, four algorithms were evaluated, where DeepCyTOF and CyTOF Linear Classifier performed the best. We further provided practical recommendations on prioritizing gating methods based on different application scenarios. This study offers comprehensive insights for biologists to understand diverse gating methods and choose the best-suited ones for their applications.
Hung-Ching Chang, Wenjia Wang 0002, Yusi Fang, Xiangning Xue, Jessica M. Toothaker, Oluwabunmi Olaloye, Eduardo Gonzalez Santiago, Black McCourt, Vanessa Mitsialis, Pietro Presicce, Suhas G. Kallapur, Scott B. Snapper, Jia-Jun Liu, George C. Tseng, Liza Konnikova, Silvia Liu
Briefings Bioinform.19
2019 MetaOmics: analysis pipeline and browser-based software suite for transcriptomic meta-analysis
abstract
SUMMARY: The rapid advances of omics technologies have generated abundant genomic data in public repositories and effective analytical approaches are critical to fully decipher biological knowledge inside these data. Meta-analysis combines multiple studies of a related hypothesis to improve statistical power, accuracy and reproducibility beyond individual study analysis. To date, many transcriptomic meta-analysis methods have been developed, yet few thoughtful guidelines exist. Here, we introduce a comprehensive analytical pipeline and browser-based software suite, called MetaOmics, to meta-analyze multiple transcriptomic studies for various biological purposes, including quality control, differential expression analysis, pathway enrichment analysis, differential co-expression network analysis, prediction, clustering and dimension reduction. The pipeline includes many public as well as >10 in-house transcriptomic meta-analytic methods with data-driven and biological-aim-driven strategies, hands-on protocols, an intuitive user interface and step-by-step instructions. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: MetaOmics is freely available at https://github.com/metaOmics/metaOmics. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Tianzhou Ma, Zhiguang Huo, Anche Kuo, Chien-Wei Lin, Silvia Liu, Tanbin Rahman, Lun-Ching Chang, Yongseok Park, Chi Song, Steffi Oesterreich, Etienne Sibille, George C. Tseng
Bioinform.8
2017 Meta-analytic framework for liquid association
abstract
MOTIVATION: Although coexpression analysis via pair-wise expression correlation is popularly used to elucidate gene-gene interactions at the whole-genome scale, many complicated multi-gene regulations require more advanced detection methods. Liquid association (LA) is a powerful tool to detect the dynamic correlation of two gene variables depending on the expression level of a third variable (LA scouting gene). LA detection from single transcriptomic study, however, is often unstable and not generalizable due to cohort bias, biological variation and limited sample size. With the rapid development of microarray and NGS technology, LA analysis combining multiple gene expression studies can provide more accurate and stable results. RESULTS: In this article, we proposed two meta-analytic approaches for LA analysis (MetaLA and MetaMLA) to combine multiple transcriptomic studies. To compensate demanding computing, we also proposed a two-step fast screening algorithm for more efficient genome-wide screening: bootstrap filtering and sign filtering. We applied the methods to five Saccharomyces cerevisiae datasets related to environmental changes. The fast screening algorithm reduced 98% of running time. When compared with single study analysis, MetaLA and MetaMLA provided stronger detection signal and more consistent and stable results. The top triplets are highly enriched in fundamental biological processes related to environmental changes. Our method can help biologists understand underlying regulatory mechanisms under different environmental exposure or disease states. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: A MetaLA R package, data and code for this article are available at http://tsenglab.biostat.pitt.edu/software.htm. CONTACT: [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Silvia Liu, Shin-sheng Yuan, Yen-Yi Ho, George C. Tseng
Bioinform.2