Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Donald F. Conrad

dblp:209/7740 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0003-3828-8970ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 64% Computational science and engineering · 19% Medical and health informatics · 17%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › single-cell analysis
cell type annotation
0.712023
Consensus label propagation with graph convolutional networks for single-cell RNA sequencing cell type annotation · Bioinform. 2023
Computational science and engineering › graph learning › graph neural network
graph convolutional network
0.712023
Consensus label propagation with graph convolutional networks for single-cell RNA sequencing cell type annotation · Bioinform. 2023
Bioinformatics and computational biology › single-cell analysis
single-cell RNA sequencing
0.712023
Consensus label propagation with graph convolutional networks for single-cell RNA sequencing cell type annotation · Bioinform. 2023
Medical and health informatics › computational pathology
histopathology image analysis
0.612022
SATINN: an automated neural network-based classification of testicular sections allows for high-throughput histopathology of mouse mutants · Bioinform. 2022
Bioinformatics and computational biology › statistical genetics
genotype calling
0.312017
Estimating error models for whole genome sequencing using mixtures of Dirichlet-multinomial distributions · Bioinform. 2017
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics
genotyping
0.312017
Estimating error models for whole genome sequencing using mixtures of Dirichlet-multinomial distributions · Bioinform. 2017
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics › genome sequencing
whole genome sequencing
0.312017
Estimating error models for whole genome sequencing using mixtures of Dirichlet-multinomial distributions · Bioinform. 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

semi-supervised learning · 0.7graph convolutional network · 0.7consensus labeling · 0.7residual learning · 0.6convolutional neural network · 0.6dirichlet-multinomial mixture model · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Consensus label propagation with graph convolutional networks for single-cell RNA sequencing cell type annotation
abstract
MOTIVATION: Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data, annotated by cell type, is useful in a variety of downstream biological applications, such as profiling gene expression at the single-cell level. However, manually assigning these annotations with known marker genes is both time-consuming and subjective. RESULTS: We present a Graph Convolutional Network (GCN)-based approach to automate the annotation process. Our process builds upon existing labeling approaches, using state-of-the-art tools to find cells with highly confident label assignments through consensus and spreading these confident labels with a semi-supervised GCN. Using simulated data and two scRNA-seq datasets from different tissues, we show that our method improves accuracy over a simple consensus algorithm and the average of the underlying tools. We also compare our method to a nonparametric neighbor majority approach, showing comparable results. We then demonstrate that our GCN method allows for feature interpretation, identifying important genes for cell type classification. We present our completed pipeline, written in PyTorch, as an end-to-end tool for automating and interpreting the classification of scRNA-seq data. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Our code for conducting the experiments in this paper and using our model is available at https://github.com/lewinsohndp/scSHARP.
Daniel P. Lewinsohn, Katinka A Vigh-Conrad, Donald F. Conrad, Cory B. Scott
Bioinform.3
2022 SATINN: an automated neural network-based classification of testicular sections allows for high-throughput histopathology of mouse mutants
abstract
MOTIVATION: The mammalian testis is a complex organ with a cellular composition that changes smoothly and cyclically in normal adults. While testis histology is already an invaluable tool for identifying and describing developmental differences in evolution and disease, methods for standardized, digital image analysis of testis are needed to expand the utility of this approach. RESULTS: We developed SATINN (Software for Analysis of Testis Images with Neural Networks), a multi-level framework for automated analysis of multiplexed immunofluorescence images from mouse testis. This approach uses residual learning to train convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to classify nuclei from seminiferous tubules into seven distinct cell types with an accuracy of 81.7%. These cell classifications are then used in a second-level tubule CNN, which places seminiferous tubules into one of 12 distinct tubule stages with 57.3% direct accuracy and 94.9% within ±1 stage. We further describe numerous cell- and tubule-level statistics that can be derived from wild-type testis. Finally, we demonstrate how the classifiers and derived statistics can be used to rapidly and precisely describe pathology by applying our methods to image data from two mutant mouse lines. Our results demonstrate the feasibility and potential of using computer-assisted analysis for testis histology, an area poised to evolve rapidly on the back of emerging, spatially resolved genomic and proteomic technologies. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The source code to reproduce the results described here and a SATINN standalone application with graphic-user interface are available from http://github.com/conradlab/SATINN. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Alexandra M. Stendahl, Katinka A Vigh-Conrad, Madison Held, Ana C. Lima, Donald F. Conrad
Bioinform.6
2017 Estimating error models for whole genome sequencing using mixtures of Dirichlet-multinomial distributions
abstract
MOTIVATION: Accurate identification of genotypes is an essential part of the analysis of genomic data, including in identification of sequence polymorphisms, linking mutations with disease and determining mutation rates. Biological and technical processes that adversely affect genotyping include copy-number-variation, paralogous sequences, library preparation, sequencing error and reference-mapping biases, among others. RESULTS: We modeled the read depth for all data as a mixture of Dirichlet-multinomial distributions, resulting in significant improvements over previously used models. In most cases the best model was comprised of two distributions. The major-component distribution is similar to a binomial distribution with low error and low reference bias. The minor-component distribution is overdispersed with higher error and reference bias. We also found that sites fitting the minor component are enriched for copy number variants and low complexity regions, which can produce erroneous genotype calls. By removing sites that do not fit the major component, we can improve the accuracy of genotype calls. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Methods and data files are available at https://github.com/CartwrightLab/WuEtAl2017/ (doi:10.5281/zenodo.256858). CONTACT: [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data is available at Bioinformatics online.
Steven H. Wu, Rachel Schwartz, David J. Winter, Donald F. Conrad, Reed A. Cartwright
Bioinform.4