Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Karpakamurthy Muthukumar

dblp:209/8670 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Software-defined and programmable networks · 38% Network management and operations · 38% Datacenter networks · 12%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Network management and operations
network configuration
0.312017
Comparing OpenFlow and NETCONF when interconnecting data centers · ICNP 2017
Software-defined and programmable networks
SDN controller
0.312017
Comparing OpenFlow and NETCONF when interconnecting data centers · ICNP 2017
Datacenter networks
datacenter interconnect
0.112017
Comparing OpenFlow and NETCONF when interconnecting data centers · ICNP 2017
Optical networks
optical transmission
0.112017
Comparing OpenFlow and NETCONF when interconnecting data centers · ICNP 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

openflow · 0.3YANG · 0.3NETCONF · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 Comparing OpenFlow and NETCONF when interconnecting data centers
abstract
SDN technology has been applied to a range of different networks, ranging from Ethernet services to large cloud environments. More recently, interest has turned towards extending programmability of Optical Transport Networks (OTN). In the SDN architecture, SBIs are used to communicate between the SDN controller and the switches or routers in the network. In this paper, we deploy OpenFlow and NETCONF as SBIs in managing BoD across interconnected data centers over OTN. More specifically, we use these protocols to communicate between an OpenDayLight controller and two BTI7800 network elements that interconnect the data centers. We present experimental results for both BTI's YANG-based NETCONF implementation and our port of OpenFlow for a number of use cases. Our results show that NETCONF is faster and requires fewer control message. However, OpenFlow offers better bandwidth utilization over the interconnecting link.
Thomas Kunz, Karpakamurthy Muthukumar
ICNP2