Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Christian Carmona
dblp:209/8822 · also Chris U. Carmona
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0003-0224-4968ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data mining · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Representation and self-supervised learning · 77% Time series and sequential data · 23% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › sequence representation learning
multivariate time-series representation learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Neural Contextual Anomaly Detection for Time Series · IJCAI 2022 |
Data mining
anomaly detection |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Neural Contextual Anomaly Detection for Time Series · IJCAI 2022 |
Data mining › anomaly detection
time series anomaly detection |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Neural Contextual Anomaly Detection for Time Series · IJCAI 2022 |
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data
anomaly detection |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Neural Contextual Anomaly Detection for Time Series · IJCAI 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
representation learning · 1.1deep anomaly detection · 1.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Neural Contextual Anomaly Detection for Time SeriesabstractWe introduce Neural Contextual Anomaly Detection (NCAD), a framework for anomaly detection on time series that scales seamlessly from the unsupervised to supervised setting, and is applicable to both univariate and multivariate time series. This is achieved by combining recent developments in representation learning for multivariate time series, with techniques for deep anomaly detection originally developed for computer vision that we tailor to the time series setting. Our window-based approach facilitates learning the boundary between normal and anomalous classes by injecting generic synthetic anomalies into the available data. NCAD can effectively take advantage of domain knowledge and of any available training labels. We demonstrate empirically on standard benchmark datasets that our approach obtains a state-of-the-art performance in the supervised, semi-supervised, and unsupervised settings. Christian Carmona, Francois-Xavier Aubet, Valentin Flunkert, Jan Gasthaus |
IJCAI | 1 |
| 2020 | Semi-Modular Inference: enhanced learning in multi-modular models by tempering the influence of componentsabstractBayesian statistical inference loses predictive optimality when generative models are misspecified.Working within an existing coherent loss-based generalisation of Bayesian inference, we show existing Modular/Cut-model inference is coherent, and write down a new family of Semi-Modular Inference (SMI) schemes, indexed by an influence parameter, with Bayesian inference and Cut-models as special cases. We give a meta-learning criterion and estimation procedure to choose the inference scheme. This returns Bayesian inference when there is no misspecification.The framework applies naturally to Multi-modular models. Cut-model inference allows directed information flow from well-specified modules to misspecified modules, but not vice versa. An existing alternative power posterior method gives tunable but undirected control of information flow, improving prediction in some settings. In contrast, SMI allows \emph{tunable and directed} information flow between modules.We illustrate our methods on two standard test cases from the literature and a motivating archaeological data set. Christian Carmona, Geoff K. Nicholls |
AISTATS | 1 |