Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yu Gai
dblp:209/9750
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Efficient and distributed learning · 59% Optimization for machine learning · 30% Deep learning architectures and training · 11% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
convergence analysis |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | A Statistical Framework for Low-bitwidth Training of Deep Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › communication compression
gradient quantization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | A Statistical Framework for Low-bitwidth Training of Deep Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
low-precision training |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | A Statistical Framework for Low-bitwidth Training of Deep Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › quantization
quantization-aware training |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | A Statistical Framework for Low-bitwidth Training of Deep Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › quantization
quantized training |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | A Statistical Framework for Low-bitwidth Training of Deep Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › convergence guarantees
stochastic gradient descent convergence |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | A Statistical Framework for Low-bitwidth Training of Deep Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
loss function design |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Loss Functions for Multiset Prediction · NeurIPS 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
variance analysis · 0.4statistical framework · 0.4gradient quantizer · 0.4reinforcement learning · 0.3aggregated distribution matching · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Why and How LLMs Hallucinate: Connecting the Dots with Subsequence AssociationsabstractLarge language models (LLMs) frequently generate hallucinations—content that deviates from factually inaccurate or deviates from provided context—posing challenges for diagnosis. However, diagnosing the causes of hallucination is challenging due to the complex interplay of underlying causes. This paper introduces a framework to systematically understand the sources of hallucination behavior in large language models. Our key insight is that hallucinations arise when more frequent but non-factual associations outweigh faithful ones.
Through theoretical and empirical analyses, we demonstrate that decoder-only transformers effectively function as subsequence embedding models, with the fully-connected layers encoding input-output associations. We propose a tracing algorithm that identifies causal subsequences by analyzing hallucination probabilities across randomized input contexts. Experiments show our method outperforms standard attribution techniques in identifying hallucination causes and is supported by evidence from the model’s training corpus. This work provides a unified perspective on hallucinations and a robust framework for their cause and analysis. Yiyou Sun, Yu Gai, Lijie Chen 0001, Abhilasha Ravichander, Yejin Choi 0001, Nouha Dziri, Dawn Song |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2020 | A Statistical Framework for Low-bitwidth Training of Deep Neural NetworksabstractFully quantized training (FQT), which uses low-bitwidth hardware by quantizing the activations, weights, and gradients of a neural network model, is a promising approach to accelerate the training of deep neural networks. One major challenge with FQT is the lack of theoretical understanding, in particular of how gradient quantization impacts convergence properties. In this paper, we address this problem by presenting a statistical framework for analyzing FQT algorithms. We view the quantized gradient of FQT as a stochastic estimator of its full precision counterpart, a procedure known as quantization-aware training (QAT). We show that the FQT gradient is an unbiased estimator of the QAT gradient, and we discuss the impact of gradient quantization on its variance. Inspired by these theoretical results, we develop two novel gradient quantizers, and we show that these have smaller variance than the existing per-tensor quantizer. For training ResNet-50 on ImageNet, our 5-bit block Householder quantizer achieves only 0.5% validation accuracy loss relative to QAT, comparable to the existing INT8 baseline. Jianfei Chen 0001, Yu Gai, Zhewei Yao, Michael W. Mahoney, Joseph Gonzalez 0001 |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2018 | Loss Functions for Multiset PredictionabstractWe study the problem of multiset prediction. The goal of multiset prediction is to train a predictor that maps an input to a multiset consisting of multiple items. Unlike existing problems in supervised learning, such as classification, ranking and sequence generation, there is no known order among items in a target multiset, and each item in the multiset may appear more than once, making this problem extremely challenging. In this paper, we propose a novel multiset loss function by viewing this problem from the perspective of sequential decision making. The proposed multiset loss function is empirically evaluated on two families of datasets, one synthetic and the other real, with varying levels of difficulty, against various baseline loss functions including reinforcement learning, sequence, and aggregated distribution matching loss functions. The experiments reveal the effectiveness of the proposed loss function over the others. Sean Welleck, Zixin Yao, Yu Gai, Jialin Mao, Zheng Zhang 0001, Kyunghyun Cho |
NeurIPS | 3 |