Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Srinivas Ravishankar
dblp:209/9805
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-8848-9722ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Language models and text generation · 31% Deep learning architectures and training · 24% Efficient and distributed learning · 12% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
adaptive computation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Adaptive recurrent vision performs zero-shot computation scaling to unseen difficulty levels · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › recurrent neural network
recurrent convolutional network |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Adaptive recurrent vision performs zero-shot computation scaling to unseen difficulty levels · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
recurrent neural network |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Adaptive recurrent vision performs zero-shot computation scaling to unseen difficulty levels · NeurIPS 2023 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
visual reasoning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Adaptive recurrent vision performs zero-shot computation scaling to unseen difficulty levels · NeurIPS 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text summarization
abstractive summarization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | X-FACTOR: A Cross-metric Evaluation of Factual Correctness in Abstractive Summarization · EMNLP 2022 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › trustworthy language model › large language model reliability
factuality |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | X-FACTOR: A Cross-metric Evaluation of Factual Correctness in Abstractive Summarization · EMNLP 2022 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
text summarization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | X-FACTOR: A Cross-metric Evaluation of Factual Correctness in Abstractive Summarization · EMNLP 2022 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
knowledge base question answering |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | A Semantic Parsing and Reasoning-Based Approach to Knowledge Base Question Answering · AAAI 2021 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
semantic parsing |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | A Semantic Parsing and Reasoning-Based Approach to Knowledge Base Question Answering · AAAI 2021 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › automated reasoning
knowledge base reasoning |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | A Semantic Parsing and Reasoning-Based Approach to Knowledge Base Question Answering · AAAI 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
lateral connections · 0.7gating · 0.7adaptive halting · 0.7factual consistency metrics · 0.6cross-metric evaluation · 0.6relationship linking · 0.5entity linking · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Adaptive recurrent vision performs zero-shot computation scaling to unseen difficulty levelsabstractHumans solving algorithmic (or) reasoning problems typically exhibit solution times that grow as a function of problem difficulty.
Adaptive recurrent neural networks have been shown to exhibit this property for various language-processing tasks. However, little work has been performed to assess whether such adaptive computation can also enable vision models to extrapolate solutions beyond their training distribution's difficulty level, with prior work focusing on very simple tasks. In this study, we investigate a critical functional role of such adaptive processing using recurrent neural networks: to dynamically scale computational resources conditional on input requirements that allow for zero-shot generalization to novel difficulty levels not seen during training using two challenging visual reasoning tasks: PathFinder and Mazes. We combine convolutional recurrent neural networks (ConvRNNs) with a learnable halting mechanism based on Graves (2016). We explore various implementations of such adaptive ConvRNNs (AdRNNs) ranging from tying weights across layers to more sophisticated biologically inspired recurrent networks that possess lateral connections and gating. We show that 1) AdRNNs learn to dynamically halt processing early (or late) to solve easier (or harder) problems, 2) these RNNs zero-shot generalize to more difficult problem settings not shown during training by dynamically increasing the number of recurrent iterations at test time. Our study provides modeling evidence supporting the hypothesis that recurrent processing enables the functional advantage of adaptively allocating compute resources conditional on input requirements and hence allowing generalization to harder difficulty levels of a visual reasoning problem without training. Vijay Veerabadran, Srinivas Ravishankar, Ritik Raina, Virginia R. de Sa |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2022 | X-FACTOR: A Cross-metric Evaluation of Factual Correctness in Abstractive SummarizationabstractSubhajit Chaudhury, Sarathkrishna Swaminathan, Chulaka Gunasekara, Maxwell Crouse, Srinivas Ravishankar, Daiki Kimura, Keerthiram Murugesan, Ramón Fernandez Astudillo, Tahira Naseem, Pavan Kapanipathi, Alexander Gray. Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2022. Subhajit Chaudhury, Sarathkrishna Swaminathan, R. Chulaka Gunasekara, Maxwell Crouse, Srinivas Ravishankar, Daiki Kimura, Keerthiram Murugesan, Ramón Fernandez Astudillo, Tahira Naseem, Pavan Kapanipathi, Alexander G. Gray |
EMNLP | 5 |
| 2021 | A Semantic Parsing and Reasoning-Based Approach to Knowledge Base Question AnsweringabstractKnowledge Base Question Answering (KBQA) is a task where existing techniques have faced significant challenges, such as the need for complex question understanding, reasoning, and large training datasets. In this work, we demonstrate Deep Thinking Question Answering (DTQA), a semantic parsing and reasoning-based KBQA system. DTQA (1) integrates multiple, reusable modules that are trained specifically for their individual tasks (e.g. semantic parsing, entity linking, and relationship linking), eliminating the need for end-to-end KBQA training data; (2) leverages semantic parsing and a reasoner for improved question understanding. DTQA is a system of systems that achieves state-of-the-art performance on two popular KBQA datasets. Ibrahim Abdelaziz, Srinivas Ravishankar, Pavan Kapanipathi, Salim Roukos, Alexander G. Gray |
AAAI | 2 |
| 2020 | Leveraging Semantic Parsing for Relation Linking over Knowledge Bases
Nandana Mihindukulasooriya, Gaetano Rossiello, Pavan Kapanipathi, Ibrahim Abdelaziz, Srinivas Ravishankar, Mo Yu, Alfio Massimiliano Gliozzo, Salim Roukos, Alexander G. Gray |
ISWC (1) | 5 |