Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Andrew Bray
dblp:209/9832 · also Andrew P. Bray
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-4037-7414ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 2Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
2 papers |
Privacy and data protection · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy |
1.0 | 2 | 2023 | The Test of Tests: A Framework for Differentially Private Hypothesis Testing · ICML 2023 Differentially Private Nonparametric Hypothesis Testing · CCS 2019 |
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy
private hypothesis testing |
1.0 | 2 | 2023 | The Test of Tests: A Framework for Differentially Private Hypothesis Testing · ICML 2023 Differentially Private Nonparametric Hypothesis Testing · CCS 2019 |
Privacy and data protection
hypothesis testing |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | The Test of Tests: A Framework for Differentially Private Hypothesis Testing · ICML 2023 |
Privacy and data protection
privacy-preserving data analysis |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Differentially Private Nonparametric Hypothesis Testing · CCS 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
differential privacy · 1.0nonparametric hypothesis testing · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | The Test of Tests: A Framework for Differentially Private Hypothesis TestingabstractWe present a generic framework for creating differentially private versions of any hypothesis test in a black-box way. We analyze the resulting tests analytically and experimentally. Most crucially, we show good practical performance for small data sets, showing that at ε = 1 we only need 5-6 times as much data as in the fully public setting. We compare our work to the one existing framework of this type, as well as to several individually-designed private hypothesis tests. Our framework is higher power than other generic solutions and at least competitive with (and often better than) individually-designed tests. Zeki Kazan, Kaiyan Shi, Adam Groce, Andrew Bray |
ICML | 4 |
| 2019 | Differentially Private Nonparametric Hypothesis TestingabstractHypothesis tests are a crucial statistical tool for data mining and are the workhorse of scientific research in many fields. Here we study differentially private tests of independence between a categorical and a continuous variable. We take as our starting point traditional nonparametric tests, which require no distributional assumption (e.g., normality) about the data distribution. We present private analogues of the Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney, and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, as well as the parametric one-sample t-test. These tests use novel test statistics developed specifically for the private setting. We compare our tests to prior work, both on parametric and nonparametric tests. We find that in all cases our new nonparametric tests achieve large improvements in statistical power, even when the assumptions of parametric tests are met. Simon Couch, Zeki Kazan, Kaiyan Shi, Andrew Bray, Adam Groce |
CCS | 4 |
| 2019 | Improved Differentially Private Analysis of VarianceabstractAbstract Hypothesis testing is one of the most common types of data analysis and forms the backbone of scientific research in many disciplines. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) in particular is used to detect dependence between a categorical and a numerical variable. Here we show how one can carry out this hypothesis test under the restrictions of differential privacy. We show that the F -statistic, the optimal test statistic in the public setting, is no longer optimal in the private setting, and we develop a new test statistic F 1 with much higher statistical power. We show how to rigorously compute a reference distribution for the F 1 statistic and give an algorithm that outputs accurate p-values. We implement our test and experimentally optimize several parameters. We then compare our test to the only previous work on private ANOVA testing, using the same effect size as that work. We see an order of magnitude improvement, with our test requiring only 7% as much data to detect the effect. Marika Swanberg, Ira Globus-Harris, Iris Griffith, Anna M. Ritz, Adam Groce, Andrew Bray |
Proc. Priv. Enhancing Technol. | 6 |