Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Paul McKeigue

dblp:21/10453 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 60% Computational social science and digital humanities · 40%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Learning theory · 50% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 50%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational social science and digital humanities
causal inference
0.112010
Sparse Instrumental Variables (SPIV) for Genome-Wide Studies · NIPS 2010
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics
genome-wide association study
0.112010
Sparse Instrumental Variables (SPIV) for Genome-Wide Studies · NIPS 2010
Bioinformatics and computational biology › statistical genetics
genotype-phenotype association
0.112010
Sparse Instrumental Variables (SPIV) for Genome-Wide Studies · NIPS 2010
Computational social science and digital humanities › causal inference
instrumental variable
0.112010
Sparse Instrumental Variables (SPIV) for Genome-Wide Studies · NIPS 2010
Bioinformatics and computational biology
statistical genetics
0.112010
Sparse Instrumental Variables (SPIV) for Genome-Wide Studies · NIPS 2010
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
latent variable model
0.012010
Sparse Instrumental Variables (SPIV) for Genome-Wide Studies · NIPS 2010
Machine learning › Learning theory › high-dimensional regression
sparse regression
0.012010
Sparse Instrumental Variables (SPIV) for Genome-Wide Studies · NIPS 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sparse instrumental variables · 0.2causal structure inference · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2010 Sparse Instrumental Variables (SPIV) for Genome-Wide Studies
abstract
This paper describes a probabilistic framework for studying associations between multiple genotypes, biomarkers, and phenotypic traits in the presence of noise and unobserved confounders for large genetic studies. The framework builds on sparse linear methods developed for regression and modified here for inferring causal structures of richer networks with latent variables. The method is motivated by the use of genotypes as ``instruments'' to infer causal associations between phenotypic biomarkers and outcomes, without making the common restrictive assumptions of instrumental variable methods. The method may be used for an effective screening of potentially interesting genotype phenotype and biomarker-phenotype associations in genome-wide studies, which may have important implications for validating biomarkers as possible proxy endpoints for early stage clinical trials. Where the biomarkers are gene transcripts, the method can be used for fine mapping of quantitative trait loci (QTLs) detected in genetic linkage studies. The method is applied for examining effects of gene transcript levels in the liver on plasma HDL cholesterol levels for a sample of sequenced mice from a heterogeneous stock, with $\sim 10^5$ genetic instruments and $\sim 47 \times 10^3$ gene transcripts.
Felix V. Agakov, Paul McKeigue, Jon Krohn, Amos J. Storkey
NIPS2