Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Eyal Gofer

dblp:21/1846 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
7as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0003-4135-0632ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 5 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
3D vision · 91% Autonomous driving · 9%
Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Approximation and online algorithms · 64% Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 19% Mathematical optimization · 17%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 77% Computational finance and economics · 23%

Topics — the 13 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › 3D vision › depth estimation
depth completion
0.512021
Adaptive LiDAR Sampling and Depth Completion Using Ensemble Variance · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2021
Computer vision › 3D vision
depth estimation
0.512021
Adaptive LiDAR Sampling and Depth Completion Using Ensemble Variance · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2021
Computer vision › 3D vision › range sensing
depth sensing
0.512021
Adaptive LiDAR Sampling and Depth Completion Using Ensemble Variance · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2021
Approximation and online algorithms
online learning
0.212014
Higher-Order Regret Bounds with Switching Costs · COLT 2014
Approximation and online algorithms › online learning
online linear optimization
0.212014
Higher-Order Regret Bounds with Switching Costs · COLT 2014
Mathematical optimization › online optimization
regret bounds
0.212014
Higher-Order Regret Bounds with Switching Costs · COLT 2014
Approximation and online algorithms › online algorithms
switching costs
0.212014
Higher-Order Regret Bounds with Switching Costs · COLT 2014
Approximation and online algorithms
online algorithms
0.212013
Regret Minimization for Branching Experts · COLT 2013
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
regret minimization
0.212013
Regret Minimization for Branching Experts · COLT 2013
Robotics › Autonomous driving
perception
0.112021
Adaptive LiDAR Sampling and Depth Completion Using Ensemble Variance · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2021
Bioinformatics and computational biology › proteomics › post-translational modification site prediction
protease cleavage site prediction
0.112008
Predicting proteolytic sites in extracellular proteins: only halfway there · Bioinform. 2008
Bioinformatics and computational biology
proteomics
0.112008
Predicting proteolytic sites in extracellular proteins: only halfway there · Bioinform. 2008
Computational finance and economics
option pricing
0.112014
Higher-Order Regret Bounds with Switching Costs · COLT 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

random forest · 0.5neural network · 0.5ensemble variance · 0.5shrinking dartboard · 0.4regularized follow the leader · 0.4quadratic variation · 0.4multiplicative weights · 0.2bandit feedback · 0.2machine learning classification · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Adaptive LiDAR Sampling and Depth Completion Using Ensemble Variance
abstract
This work considers the problem of depth completion, with or without image data, where an algorithm may measure the depth of a prescribed limited number of pixels. The algorithmic challenge is to choose pixel positions strategically and dynamically to maximally reduce overall depth estimation error. This setting is realized in daytime or nighttime depth completion for autonomous vehicles with a programmable LiDAR. Our method uses an ensemble of predictors to define a sampling probability over pixels. This probability is proportional to the variance of the predictions of ensemble members, thus highlighting pixels that are difficult to predict. By additionally proceeding in several prediction phases, we effectively reduce redundant sampling of similar pixels. Our ensemble-based method may be implemented using any depth-completion learning algorithm, such as a state-of-the-art neural network, treated as a black box. In particular, we also present a simple and effective Random Forest-based algorithm, and similarly use its internal ensemble in our design. We conduct experiments on the KITTI dataset, using the neural network algorithm of Ma et al. and our Random Forest-based learner for implementing our method. The accuracy of both implementations exceeds the state of the art. Compared with a random or grid sampling pattern, our method allows a reduction by a factor of 4-10 in the number of measurements required to attain the same accuracy.
Eyal Gofer, Shachar Praisler, Guy Gilboa
IEEE Trans. Image Process.1
2016 Lower bounds on individual sequence regret
Eyal Gofer, Yishay Mansour
Mach. Learn.1
2014 Higher-Order Regret Bounds with Switching Costs
abstract
This work examines online linear optimization with full information and switching costs (SCs) and focuses on regret bounds that depend on properties of the loss sequences. The SCs considered are bounded functions of a pair of decisions, and regret is augmented with the total SC. We show under general conditions that for any normed SC, σ(\mathbfx,\mathbfx’)=\|\mathbfx-\mathbfx’\|, regret \textitcannot be bounded given only a bound Q on the quadratic variation of losses. With an additional bound Λon the total length of losses, we prove O(\sqrtQ+Λ) regret for Regularized Follow the Leader (RFTL). Furthermore, an O(\sqrtQ) bound holds for RFTL given a cost \|\mathbfx-\mathbfx’\|^2. By generalizing the Shrinking Dartboard algorithm, we also show an expected regret bound for the best expert setting with any SC, given bounds on the total loss of the best expert and the quadratic variation of any expert. As SCs vanish, all our bounds depend purely on quadratic variation. We apply our results to pricing options in an arbitrage-free market with proportional transaction costs. In particular, we upper bound the price of “at the money” call options, assuming bounds on the quadratic variation of a stock price and the minimum of summed gains and summed losses.
Eyal Gofer
COLT1
2013 Regret Minimization for Branching Experts
abstract
We study regret minimization bounds in which the dependence on the number of experts is replaced by measures of the realized complexity of the expert class. The measures we consider are defined in retrospect given the realized losses. We concentrate on two interesting cases. In the first, our measure of complexity is the number of different “leading experts”, namely, experts that were best at some point in time. We derive regret bounds that depend only on this measure, independent of the total number of experts. We also consider a case where all experts remain grouped in just a few clusters in terms of their realized cumulative losses. Here too, our regret bounds depend only on the number of clusters determined in retrospect, which serves as a measure of complexity. Our results are obtained as special cases of a more general analysis for a setting of branching experts,where the set of experts may grow over time according to a tree-like structure, determined by an adversary. For this setting of branching experts, we give algorithms and analysis that cover both the full information and the bandit scenarios.
Eyal Gofer, Nicolò Cesa-Bianchi, Claudio Gentile, Yishay Mansour
COLT1
2012 Lower Bounds on Individual Sequence Regret
Eyal Gofer, Yishay Mansour
ALT1
2011 Regret Minimization Algorithms for Pricing Lookback Options
Eyal Gofer, Yishay Mansour
ALT1
2011 Pricing Exotic Derivatives Using Regret Minimization
Eyal Gofer, Yishay Mansour
SAGT1
2008 Predicting proteolytic sites in extracellular proteins: only halfway there
abstract
MOTIVATION: Many secretory proteins are synthesized as inactive precursors that must undergo post-translational proteolysis in order to mature and become active. In the current study, we address the challenge of sequence-based discovery of proteolytic sites in secreted proteins using machine learning. RESULTS: The results revealed that only half of the extracellular proteolytic sites are currently annotated, leaving over 3600 unannotated ones. Furthermore, we have found that only 6% of the unannotated sites are similar to known proteolytic sites, whereas the remaining 94% do not share significant similarity with any annotated proteolytic site. The computational challenges in these two cases are very different. While the precision in detecting the former group is close to perfect, only a mere 22% of the latter group were detected with a precision of 80%. The applicability of the classifier is demonstrated through members of the FGF family, in which we verified the conservation of physiologically-relevant proteolytic sites in homologous proteins.
Yossef Kliger, Eyal Gofer, Assaf Wool, Amir Toporik, Avihay Apatoff, Moshe Olshansky
Bioinform.2