Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
William Jones 0002
dblp:21/4258-2
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
0000-0003-2999-9025ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Computer networks · 2 · 2 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer networks
1 paper |
Wireless networking · 67% Cellular and mobile networks · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Wireless networking › medium access control › collision avoidance
CSMA/CA |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | A Pragmatic Approach to Clear Channel Assessment Threshold Adaptation and Transmission Power Control for Performance Gain in CSMA/CA WLANs · IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2020 |
Cellular and mobile networks › power control
transmission power control |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | A Pragmatic Approach to Clear Channel Assessment Threshold Adaptation and Transmission Power Control for Performance Gain in CSMA/CA WLANs · IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2020 |
Wireless networking
WLAN |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | A Pragmatic Approach to Clear Channel Assessment Threshold Adaptation and Transmission Power Control for Performance Gain in CSMA/CA WLANs · IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
simulation · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | A Pragmatic Approach to Clear Channel Assessment Threshold Adaptation and Transmission Power Control for Performance Gain in CSMA/CA WLANsabstractWe propose practical sets of rules for adapting Clear Channel Assessment (CCA) and Transmit Power (TP) parameters by simulating ensembles of randomly generated wireless networks and collecting throughput statistics. The rules' performances depend strongly on network topology, with increases in throughput in many cases. However, networks with a high clustering coefficient are often adversely effected by the adaptations. But simulations of small-scale networks show that apparently adverse adaptations may still yield benefits for uneven demand combinations. Finally, we have found that throughput is not usually correlated with the number of hidden or exposed nodes in any non-trivial network set-up. William Jones 0002, R. Eddie Wilson, Angela Doufexi, Mahesh Sooriyabandara |
IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. | 1 |
| 2018 | Effects of Routing on the Capacity of Multi-Hop Wireless NetworksabstractWe consider multi-hop wireless mesh networks and examine whether capacity may be improved by distributing the data flows for each origin-destination (OD) pair across multiple routes. The network geometry and the application of technologies, such as beamforming or full-duplex, are described by a matrix that describes which pairs of transmissions (or 'links') are compatible in that they can occur simultaneously without collisions or other conflicts. Under a binary interference framework, the conflict matrix is used to derive the maximal sets of compatible links, and secondly, these are used to derive a system of linear inequalities that bounds links' data flows. These steps are computationally expensive, but we show how the system usually collapses when re-expressed in terms of flows on routes. The theory is illustrated in terms of a simple 'Braess' network example with a single OD pair. We then consider networks with two OD pairs whose data flows have some nodes in common and thus contend with each other. We show how to design networks that exploit multiple relay nodes and routes so as to increase capacity. We then examine the same problem on ensembles of random networks. We find that in many cases, capacity can be improved if the OD pairs distribute their traffic over several routes. We pose and solve a set of linear programs that model (i) cooperative behavior; (ii) the optimization of one OD pair when presented with a fixed route assignment by the other; and (iii) variants of these games when both OD pairs are in contention with background (single-hop) traffic. William Jones 0002, R. Eddie Wilson |
MSWiM | 1 |