Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Peter Földiák

dblp:21/4446 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2008
0000-0001-7407-5804ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 2 first-authorTheory of computation · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%
Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 63% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 28% Trustworthy machine learning · 10%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Information theory · 100%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology
computational neuroscience
0.222008
Interpreting the neural code with Formal Concept Analysis · NIPS 2008
Bayesian binning beats approximate alternatives: estimating peri-stimulus time histograms · NIPS 2007
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › concept formation › formal concept analysis
concept lattice
0.112008
Interpreting the neural code with Formal Concept Analysis · NIPS 2008
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › concept formation
formal concept analysis
0.112008
Interpreting the neural code with Formal Concept Analysis · NIPS 2008
Bioinformatics and computational biology › computational neuroscience
neural decoding
0.112008
Interpreting the neural code with Formal Concept Analysis · NIPS 2008
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference
bayesian model selection
0.112007
Bayesian binning beats approximate alternatives: estimating peri-stimulus time histograms · NIPS 2007
Bioinformatics and computational biology › neuroscience › neuroinformatics › neural data analysis
spike train analysis
0.112007
Bayesian binning beats approximate alternatives: estimating peri-stimulus time histograms · NIPS 2007
Information theory › estimation theory
bayesian estimation
0.112005
Bayesian bin distribution inference and mutual information · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2005
Information theory › estimation theory
entropy estimation
0.112005
Bayesian bin distribution inference and mutual information · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2005
Information theory › information measures
mutual information
0.112005
Bayesian bin distribution inference and mutual information · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2005
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.012008
Interpreting the neural code with Formal Concept Analysis · NIPS 2008

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

bayesian inference · 0.2formal concept analysis · 0.2gaussian kernel smoothing · 0.1bayesian binning · 0.1piecewise-constant distribution · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2008 Interpreting the neural code with Formal Concept Analysis
abstract
We propose a novel application of Formal Concept Analysis (FCA) to neural decoding: instead of just trying to figure out which stimulus was presented, we demonstrate how to explore the semantic relationships between the neural representation of large sets of stimuli. FCA provides a way of displaying and interpreting such relationships via concept lattices. We explore the effects of neural code sparsity on the lattice. We then analyze neurophysiological data from high-level visual cortical area STSa, using an exact Bayesian approach to construct the formal context needed by FCA. Prominent features of the resulting concept lattices are discussed, including indications for a product-of-experts code in real neurons.
Dominik M. Endres, Peter Földiák
NIPS2
2007 Bayesian binning beats approximate alternatives: estimating peri-stimulus time histograms
abstract
The peristimulus time historgram (PSTH) and its more continuous cousin, the spike density function (SDF) are staples in the analytic toolkit of neurophysiologists. The former is usually obtained by binning spiketrains, whereas the standard method for the latter is smoothing with a Gaussian kernel. Selection of a bin with or a kernel size is often done in an relatively arbitrary fashion, even though there have been recent attempts to remedy this situation \cite{ShimazakiBinningNIPS2006,ShimazakiBinningNECO2007}. We develop an exact Bayesian, generative model approach to estimating PSHTs and demonstate its superiority to competing methods. Further advantages of our scheme include automatic complexity control and error bars on its predictions.
Dominik M. Endres, Mike W. Oram, Johannes E. Schindelin, Peter Földiák
NIPS4
2005 Bayesian bin distribution inference and mutual information
abstract
We present an exact Bayesian treatment of a simple, yet sufficiently general probability distribution model. We consider piecewise-constant distributions P(X) with uniform (second-order) prior over location of discontinuity points and assigned chances. The predictive distribution and the model complexity can be determined completely from the data in a computational time that is linear in the number of degrees of freedom and quadratic in the number of possible values of X. Furthermore, exact values of the expectations of entropies and their variances can be computed with polynomial effort. The expectation of the mutual information becomes thus available, too, and a strict upper bound on its variance. The resulting algorithm is particularly useful in experimental research areas where the number of available samples is severely limited (e.g., neurophysiology). Estimates on a simulated data set provide more accurate results than using a previously proposed method.
Dominik M. Endres, Peter Földiák
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory2
2001 Stimulus optimisation in primary visual cortex
Peter Földiák
Neurocomputing1
1996 Learning generalisation and localisation: Competition for stimulus type and receptive field
Mike W. Oram, Peter Földiák
Neurocomputing2
1991 Learning Invariance from Transformation Sequences
abstract
The visual system can reliably identify objects even when the retinal image is transformed considerably by commonly occurring changes in the environment. A local learning rule is proposed, which allows a network to learn to generalize across such transformations. During the learning phase, the network is exposed to temporal sequences of patterns undergoing the transformation. An application of the algorithm is presented in which the network learns invariance to shift in retinal position. Such a principle may be involved in the development of the characteristic shift invariance property of complex cells in the primary visual cortex, and also in the development of more complicated invariance properties of neurons in higher visual areas.
Peter Földiák
Neural Comput.1