Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Thomas Leonhardt

dblp:21/4975 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2002
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software testing · 87% Requirements engineering and software design · 13%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Software testing
automated testing
0.012002
SeDiTeC - Testing Based on Sequence Diagrams · ASE 2002
Software testing
test generation
0.012002
SeDiTeC - Testing Based on Sequence Diagrams · ASE 2002
Requirements engineering and software design › software design notation
UML sequence diagrams
0.012002
SeDiTeC - Testing Based on Sequence Diagrams · ASE 2002

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

test case data sets · 0.0pre- and postconditions · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2002 SeDiTeC - Testing Based on Sequence Diagrams
abstract
In this paper we present a concept for automated testing of object-oriented applications and a tool called SeDiTeC that implements these concepts for Java applications. SeDiTeC uses UML sequence diagrams, that are complemented by test case data sets consisting of parameters and return values for the method calls, as test specification and therefore can easily be integrated into the development process as soon as the design phase starts. SeDiTeC supports specification of several test case data sets for each sequence diagram as well as to combine several sequence diagrams to so-called combined sequence diagrams thus reducing the number of diagrams needed. For classes and their methods whose behavior is specified in sequence diagrams and the corresponding test case data sets SeDiTeC can automatically generate test stubs thus enabling testing right from the beginning of the implementation phase. Validation is not restricted to comparing the test case data sets with the observed data, but can also include validation of pre- and postconditions.
Falk Fraikin, Thomas Leonhardt
ASE2