Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Luping Liang
dblp:21/5726
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 1993
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Computer networks · 3 · 2 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Distributed systems · 50% Performance modeling and evaluation · 50% | |
| Computer networks
2 papers |
Internet of things and sensor networks · 69% Internet architecture and protocols · 31% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Distributed systems
group communication |
0.0 | 1 | 1993 | A name model for nested group communication · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 1993 |
Performance modeling and evaluation
loop detection |
0.0 | 1 | 1993 | A name model for nested group communication · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 1993 |
Internet of things and sensor networks
group communication |
0.0 | 1 | 1990 | Avoiding Name Resolution Loops and Duplications in Group Communications · SIGCOMM 1990 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
graph modeling · 0.0algorithm design · 0.0name graph model · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1993 | A name model for nested group communicationabstractGroup communication permits a single sender to communicate with multiple receivers. A nested group permits one or more of the receivers to be itself a group. Nested groups are particularly useful for reducing communication traffic on internetwork links and supporting subnetwork autonomy. A name graph model is used to characterize nested groups and formalize the problems of loops and duplications. The authors design and analyze a spanning shadow tree algorithm that detects potential loops and duplication. The algorithm is considered static because loops and duplicates are detected at the time of group membership modification rather than at the time a message is sent. The algorithm changes the system-level representation of the name graph in a transparent manner to avoid infinite loops and to suppress duplicated messages. The worst-case message complexity of name graph update operations is on the order of O( mod N mod /sup 2/), where mod N mod is the number of groups in the system. The complexity of updates can be justified, since run-time overhead for actual message communication is reduced.> Luping Liang, Gerald W. Neufeld, Samuel T. Chanson |
IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. | 1 |
| 1990 | Avoiding Name Resolution Loops and Duplications in Group CommunicationsabstractThis paper generalizes group communications into nested groups for the internet environment. By using a name graph model, two problems in nested group name resolution are identified — resolution loops and resolution duplications. Existing approaches of solving these problems are surveyed and their shortcomings analyzed. The research contribution of this paper is the design and analysis of an algorithm which uses statically saved topology information of the name graph to detect and handle resolution and duplication loops at the time when group membership and/or group structure change. While preserving some necessary properties of loops, the algorithm transforms the name graph into one which avoids resolution loops and controls duplications. The communication complexity of the algorithm has an upper bound of Ο(|A|) in the worst case, where |A| is the number of arcs in the name graph. Luping Liang, Gerald W. Neufeld, Samuel T. Chanson |
SIGCOMM | 1 |
| 1990 | A Generalized Analysis of Message Delay in STDMA
H. W. Lee, Luping Liang |
Comput. Networks ISDN Syst. | 2 |