Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Peter M. Williams

dblp:21/6456 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
7as first author
0since 2021 · last 2007
0000-0003-4914-119XORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 7 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Time series and sequential data · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Environmental and earth informatics · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data
time series modeling
0.011997
Modelling Seasonality and Trends in Daily Rainfall Data · NIPS 1997
Environmental and earth informatics › climate science
climate data analysis
0.011997
Modelling Seasonality and Trends in Daily Rainfall Data · NIPS 1997

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

bayesian modeling · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2007 Notes on conditional previsions
Peter M. Williams
Int. J. Approx. Reason.1
1999 Matrix logarithm parametrizations for neural network covariance models
Peter M. Williams
Neural Networks1
1997 Modelling Seasonality and Trends in Daily Rainfall Data
Peter M. Williams
NIPS1
1996 Using neural networks to model conditional multivariate densities
abstract
Neural network outputs are interpreted as parameters of statistical distributions. This allows us to fit conditional distributions in which the parameters depend on the inputs to the network. We exploit this in modeling multivariate data, including the univariate case, in which there may be input-dependent (e.g., time-dependent) correlations between output components. This provides a novel way of modeling conditional correlation that extends existing techniques for determining input-dependent (local) error bars.
Peter M. Williams
Neural Comput.1
1995 Bayesian Regularization and Pruning Using a Laplace Prior
abstract
Standard techniques for improved generalization from neural networks include weight decay and pruning. Weight decay has a Bayesian interpretation with the decay function corresponding to a prior over weights. The method of transformation groups and maximum entropy suggests a Laplace rather than a gaussian prior. After training, the weights then arrange themselves into two classes: (1) those with a common sensitivity to the data error and (2) those failing to achieve this sensitivity and that therefore vanish. Since the critical value is determined adaptively during training, pruning—in the sense of setting weights to exact zeros—becomes an automatic consequence of regularization alone. The count of free parameters is also reduced automatically as weights are pruned. A comparison is made with results of MacKay using the evidence framework and a gaussian regularizer.
Peter M. Williams
Neural Comput.1
1993 Aeromagnetic Compensation using Neural Networks
Peter M. Williams
Neural Comput. Appl.1
1990 An interpretation of Shenoy and Shafer's axioms for local computation
Peter M. Williams
Int. J. Approx. Reason.1