Most modern microprocessors employ one or two levels of on-chip caches in order to improve performance. Caches typically are implemented with static RAM cells and often occupy a large portion of the chip area. Not surprisingly, these caches can consume a significant amount of power. In many applications, such as portable devices, energy efficiency is more important than performance. We propose sacrificing some performance in exchange for energy efficiency by filtering cache references through an unusually small first level cache. We refer to this structure as the filter cache. A second level cache, similar in size and structure to a conventional first level cache, is positioned behind the filter cache and serves to mitigate the performance loss. Extensive experiments indicate that a small filter cache still can achieve a high hit rate and good performance. This approach allows the second level cache to be in a low power mode most of the time, thus resulting in power savings. The filter cache is particularly attractive in low power applications, such as the embedded processors used for communication and multimedia applications. For example, experimental results across a wide range of embedded applications show that a direct mapped 255-byte filter cache achieves a 58 percent power reduction while reducing performance by 21 percent. This trade-off results in a 51 percent reduction in the energy-delay product when compared to a conventional design.

Most modern microprocessors employ one or two levels of on-chip caches in order to improve performance. These caches are typically implemented with static RAM cells and often occupy a large portion of the chip area. Not surprisingly, these caches often consume a significant amount of power. In many applications, such as portable devices, low power is more important than performance. We propose to trade performance for power consumption by filtering cache references through an unusually small L1 cache. An L2 cache, which is similar in size and structure to a typical L1 cache, is positioned behind the filter cache and serves to reduce the performance loss. Experimental results across a wide range of embedded applications show that the filter cache results in improved memory system energy efficiency. For example, a direct mapped 256-byte filter cache achieves a 58% power reduction while reducing performance by 21%, corresponding to a 51% reduction in the energy-delay product over conventional design.