Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Carlos Monroy

dblp:21/6723 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 2 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Cloud and datacenter computing · 44% High-performance computing · 44% Storage systems · 13%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Cloud and datacenter computing
cluster resource management and scheduling
0.312018
PlinyCompute: A Platform for High-Performance, Distributed, Data-Intensive Tool Development · SIGMOD Conference 2018
High-performance computing › data-intensive computing
distributed data-intensive computing
0.312018
PlinyCompute: A Platform for High-Performance, Distributed, Data-Intensive Tool Development · SIGMOD Conference 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

relational-database style optimization · 0.3memory management · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 PlinyCompute: A Platform for High-Performance, Distributed, Data-Intensive Tool Development
abstract
This paper describes PlinyCompute, a system for development of high-performance, data-intensive, distributed computing tools and libraries. \emphIn the large, PlinyCompute presents the programmer with a very high-level, declarative interface, relying on automatic, relational-database style optimization to figure out how to stage distributed computations. However, in the small, PlinyCompute presents the capable systems programmer with a persistent object data model and API (the "PC object model'') and associated memory management system that has been designed from the ground-up for high performance, distributed, data-intensive computing. This contrasts with most other Big Data systems, which are constructed on top of the Java Virtual Machine (JVM), and hence must at least partially cede performance-critical concerns such as memory management (including layout and de/allocation) and virtual method/function dispatch to the JVM. This hybrid approach---declarative in the large, trusting the programmer's ability to utilize PC object model efficiently in the small---results in a system that is ideal for the development of reusable, data-intensive tools and libraries.
Jia Zou 0001, R. Matthew Barnett, Tania Lorido-Botran, Shangyu Luo, Carlos Monroy, Sourav Sikdar, Kia Teymourian, Binhang Yuan, Chris Jermaine
SIGMOD Conference5
2015 A learning analytics approach to characterize and analyze inquiry-based pedagogical processes
abstract
Here we describe the use of learning analytics (LA) for investigating inquiry-based science instruction. We define several variables that quantify curriculum usage and leverage tools from process mining to examine inquiry-based pedagogical processes. These are initial steps toward measuring and modeling fidelity of implementation of a science curriculum. We use data from one school district's use of an online science curriculum (N=1,021 teachers and nearly 330,000 page views).
Carlos Monroy, Virginia Snodgrass Rangel, Elizabeth R. Bell, Reid Whitaker
LAK1
2013 STEMscopes: contextualizing learning analytics in a K-12 science curriculum
abstract
In this paper, we discuss a scalable approach for integrating learning analytics into an online K-12 science curriculum. A description of the curriculum and the underlying pedagogical framework is followed by a discussion of the challenges to be tackled as part of this integration. We also include examples of data visualization based on real student and teacher data. With more than one million students and fifty thousand teachers using the curriculum, a massive and rich dataset is continuously updated. This repository depicts teacher and students usage of an inquiry-based science program, and offers exciting opportunities to leverage research to improve both teaching and learning. The growing dataset, with more than a hundred million items of activity in six months, also poses technical challenges such as data storage, complex aggregation and analysis with broader implications for pedagogy, big data, and learning.
Carlos Monroy, Virginia Snodgrass Rangel, Reid Whitaker
LAK1