Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Andreas Quick

dblp:21/6874 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1994
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 3Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Performance modeling and evaluation · 89% Interconnection networks and networks-on-chip · 5% Parallel and multicore computing · 5%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Debugging and program repair · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Performance modeling and evaluation
performance monitoring
0.011994
Distributed Performance Monitoring: Methods, Tools, and Applications · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 1994
Performance modeling and evaluation › tracing
event trace monitoring
0.011991
Performance Evaluation of a Communication System for Transputer-Networks Based on Monitored Event Traces · ISCA 1991
Performance modeling and evaluation
workload characterization
0.011991
Performance Evaluation of a Communication System for Transputer-Networks Based on Monitored Event Traces · ISCA 1991
Debugging and program repair
performance debugging
0.011994
Distributed Performance Monitoring: Methods, Tools, and Applications · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 1994
Parallel and multicore computing › parallel computing
parallel communication
0.011991
Performance Evaluation of a Communication System for Transputer-Networks Based on Monitored Event Traces · ISCA 1991

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

trace analysis · 0.0hybrid monitoring · 0.0instrumentation · 0.0hardware monitor · 0.0event-driven monitoring · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1994 Stochastic Modeling of Scaled Parallel Programs
abstract
Testing the performance scalability of parallel programs can be a time consuming task, involving many performance runs for different computer configurations, processor numbers, and problem sizes. Ideally, scalability issues would be addressed during parallel program design, but tools are not presently available that allow program developers to study the impact of algorithmic choices under different problem and system scenarios. Hence, scalability analysis is often reserved to existing (and available) parallel machines as well as implemented algorithms. In this paper we propose techniques for analyzing scaled parallel programs using stochastic modeling approaches. Although allowing more generality and flexibility in analysis, stochastic modeling of large parallel
Allen D. Malony, Vassilis Mertsiotakis, Andreas Quick
ICPADS3
1994 Distributed Performance Monitoring: Methods, Tools, and Applications
abstract
A method for analyzing the functional behavior and the performance of programs in distributed systems is presented. We use hybrid monitoring, a technique which combines advantages of both software monitoring and hardware monitoring. The paper contains a description of a hardware monitor and a software package (ZM4/SIMPLE) which make our concepts available to programmers, assisting them in debugging and tuning of their code. A short survey of related monitor systems highlights the distinguishing features of our implementation. As an application of our monitoring and evaluation system, the analysis of a parallel ray tracing program running on the SUPRENUM multiprocessor is described. It is shown that monitoring and modeling both rely on a common abstraction of a system's dynamic behavior and therefore can be integrated to one comprehensive methodology. This methodology is supported by a set of tools.>
Richard Hofmann, Rainer Klar, Bernd Mohr, Andreas Quick, Markus Siegle
IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst.4
1991 Performance Evaluation of a Communication System for Transputer-Networks Based on Monitored Event Traces
abstract
Most parallel applications (e.g. image processing, mtdtigrid algorithms) in a Transputer-network require a lot of communication between the processing nodes. For such applications the communication system TRACOS was developed to support data transfer between random Transputers in the network. To marimize the performance of the parallel system, its dynamic internal behavior has to be analyzed. For this purpose event-driven monitoring is an appropriate technique. It reduces the dynamic behavior of the system to sequences of events. They are recor&d by a monitor system and stored as event traces. In this paper the communication system TRACOS and its performance evaluation based on monitored event traces are presented. First a synthetic workload was instrumented and monitored with the distributed hardware monitor ZM4. The results showed that the performance of TRACOS is poor for packets smaller than 4 Kbyte. Therefore, TRACOS itself was instrumented and monitored to get insight into the interactions and interdependencies of all TRACOS processes. Based on the monitoring resuhs, TRACOS could be improved which led to a performance increase of 25T0.
C. W. Oehlrich, Andreas Quick
ISCA2