Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Giulia Piovan

dblp:21/7140 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Legged, aerial and field robots · 62% Motion planning and robot control · 25% 3D vision · 9%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › legged robots
legged robot locomotion
0.632016
Approximation and Control of the SLIP Model Dynamics via Partial Feedback Linearization and Two-Element Leg Actuation Strategy · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2016
Two-element control for the active SLIP model · ICRA 2013
Enforced symmetry of the stance phase for the Spring-Loaded Inverted Pendulum · ICRA 2012
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › legged robots › legged robot locomotion
spring-loaded inverted pendulum
0.422016
Approximation and Control of the SLIP Model Dynamics via Partial Feedback Linearization and Two-Element Leg Actuation Strategy · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2016
Enforced symmetry of the stance phase for the Spring-Loaded Inverted Pendulum · ICRA 2012
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control
0.322013
Two-element control for the active SLIP model · ICRA 2013
Enforced symmetry of the stance phase for the Spring-Loaded Inverted Pendulum · ICRA 2012
Computer vision › 3D vision › pose estimation
rotation representation
0.112012
On Coordinate-Free Rotation Decomposition: Euler Angles About Arbitrary Axes · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2012
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › nonlinear control
feedback linearization
0.112016
Approximation and Control of the SLIP Model Dynamics via Partial Feedback Linearization and Two-Element Leg Actuation Strategy · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

series actuation · 0.3partial feedback linearization · 0.2energy control · 0.2analytical dynamics · 0.2coordinate-free derivation · 0.1analytical trajectory solution · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 Approximation and Control of the SLIP Model Dynamics via Partial Feedback Linearization and Two-Element Leg Actuation Strategy
abstract
The spring loaded inverted pendulum (SLIP) has been extensively studied and used as a model capturing general aspects of legged locomotion. Biological data suggest that legs regulate energy production and removal via muscle activation; therefore, the conservative SLIP model cannot fully explain the robustness of many legged animals during running and hopping gaits. In this work we consider the active SLIP model: an energetically nonconservative version of the SLIP model with added series actuation. In particular, we propose a partial feedback linearization action for actuator displacement to analytically solve part of its dynamics, thereby reducing computational time and increasing the practicality of performing online control actions. This is then paired with a two-part control action to add/remove energy to/from the system and modify the upcoming apex state to span an open set within the reachable apex states. In addition, we develop two control strategies for online computation of actuator displacement and leg positioning: one to drive the system to a desired state, even in the presence of terrain perturbation, and the other to control the system to hop on a desired set of terrain footholds. Furthermore, we demonstrate the proposed strategy on a more dynamically sophisticated planar hopper model.
Giulia Piovan, Katie Byl
IEEE Trans. Robotics1
2013 Two-element control for the active SLIP model
abstract
The Spring Loaded Inverted Pendulum has been extensively studied and used as an inspiration to the study of legged locomotion. Biological data suggest that legs regulate energy production and removal via muscle activation, and therefore the conservative SLIP model cannot fully explain the robustness of many legged animals during running and hopping gaits. In this work we consider the active SLIP model, an energetically non-conservative version of the SLIP model with series actuation. In particular, we propose a strategy for actuator displacement to add/remove energy from the system, and to analytically solve part of its dynamics. Additionally, we develop a control strategy for online actuator displacement to drive the system to a desired state, even in the presence of terrain perturbation.
Giulia Piovan, Katie Byl
ICRA1
2012 Enforced symmetry of the stance phase for the Spring-Loaded Inverted Pendulum
abstract
The Spring-Loaded Inverted Pendulum (SLIP) is considered the simplest model to effectively describe bouncing gaits (such as running and hopping) for many legged animals and robots. For this reason, it is has often been used as a model for robot design. A key challenge in using this model, however, is the lack of a closed-form solution for the equations of motion that define the stance phase of its dynamics. This results in the impossibility of analytically predicting its trajectory. Consequently, developing a practical control strategy to operate on the model is computationally intensive, because accurately predicting the step-to-step dynamics is still an unsolved problem. By adding an actuator in series with the spring, we can develop a control law for actuator displacement which enforces a desired trajectory during stance. In particular, for our specific chosen control law, we can compute an analytical solution for the stance phase trajectory. Furthermore, we give examples of higher level control strategies for foothold placement and for keeping the forward velocity or the apex height constant on rough terrain that employ our low-level control laws, and we illustrate through simulations the performance typical of our strategy.
Giulia Piovan, Katie Byl
ICRA1
2012 On Coordinate-Free Rotation Decomposition: Euler Angles About Arbitrary Axes
abstract
This paper focuses on Euler angles and on the decomposition of rotations. We consider arbitrary rotation axes that are not necessarily mutually orthogonal; we characterize the set of rotation matrices that admit Euler angles about arbitrary rotation axes; and we provide a single set of Euler angle formulas that applies to any selection of rotation axes. The results are presented and derived in a coordinate-free setting, where no reference frames are required, and no components of any array or matrix are manipulated.
Giulia Piovan, Francesco Bullo
IEEE Trans. Robotics1