Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Darin England

dblp:21/892 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2007
0000-0003-3621-517XORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 4 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Distributed systems · 36% Cloud and datacenter computing · 27% Electronic design automation · 27%
Computer networks
1 paper
Internet of things and sensor networks · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Internet of things and sensor networks › wireless sensor network
data collection
0.112007
A Robust Spanning Tree Topology for Data Collection and Dissemination in Distributed Environments · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2007
Internet of things and sensor networks › wireless sensor network
sensor network topology
0.112007
A Robust Spanning Tree Topology for Data Collection and Dissemination in Distributed Environments · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2007
Distributed systems › peer-to-peer systems
overlay networks
0.112007
A Robust Spanning Tree Topology for Data Collection and Dissemination in Distributed Environments · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2007
Cloud and datacenter computing
job scheduling
0.112005
A new metric for robustness with application to job scheduling · HPDC 2005
Electronic design automation › high-level synthesis
scheduling
0.112005
A new metric for robustness with application to job scheduling · HPDC 2005
Parallel and multicore computing › parallel scheduling
divisible load scheduling
0.012007
A Robust Spanning Tree Topology for Data Collection and Dissemination in Distributed Environments · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2007

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

simulation · 0.1distributed algorithm · 0.1robustness metric · 0.1backfilling · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2007 A Robust Spanning Tree Topology for Data Collection and Dissemination in Distributed Environments
abstract
Large-scale distributed applications are subject to frequent disruptions due to resource contention and failure. Such disruptions are inherently unpredictable and, therefore, robustness is a desirable property for the distributed operating environment. In this work, we describe and evaluate a robust topology for applications that operate on a spanning tree overlay network. Unlike previous work that is adaptive or reactive in nature, we take a proactive approach to robustness. The topology itself is able to simultaneously withstand disturbances and exhibit good performance. We present both centralized and distributed algorithms to construct the topology, and then demonstrate its effectiveness through analysis and simulation of two classes of distributed applications: Data collection in sensor networks and data dissemination in divisible load scheduling. The results show that our robust spanning trees achieve a desirable trade-off for two opposing metrics where traditional forms of spanning trees do not. In particular, the trees generated by our algorithms exhibit both resilience to data loss and low power consumption for sensor networks. When used as the overlay network for divisible load scheduling, they display both robustness to link congestion and low values for the makespan of the schedule
Darin England, Bharadwaj Veeravalli, Jon B. Weissman
IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst.1
2005 Supporting the dynamic grid service lifecycle
abstract
This paper presents an architecture and implementation for a dynamic OGSA-based grid service architecture that extends GT3 to support dynamic service hosting - where to host and re-host a service within the grid in response to service demand and resource fluctuation. Our model goes beyond current OGSI implementations in which the service is presumed to be pre-installed at all sites (and only service instantiation is dynamic). In dynamic virtual organizations (VOs), we believe dynamic service hosting provides an important flexibility. Our model also defines several new adaptive grid service classes that support adaptation at multiple levels. Dynamic service deployment allows new services to be added or replaced without taking down a site for reconfiguration and allows a VO to respond effectively to dynamic resource availability and demand. The preliminary results suggest that the cost of dynamic installation, deployment, and invocation, is tolerable.
Jon B. Weissman, Darin England
CCGRID3
2005 A new metric for robustness with application to job scheduling
abstract
Scheduling strategies for parallel and distributed computing have mostly been oriented toward performance, while striving to achieve some notion of fairness. With the increase in size, complexity, and heterogeneity of today's computing environments, we argue that, in addition to performance metrics, scheduling algorithms should be designed for robustness. That is, they should have the ability to maintain performance under a wide variety of operating conditions. Although robustness is easy to define, there are no widely used metrics for this property. To this end, we present a methodology for characterizing and measuring the robustness of a system to a specific disturbance. The methodology is easily applied to many types of computing systems and it does not require sophisticated mathematical models. To illustrate its use, we show three applications of our technique to job scheduling; one supporting a previous result with respect to backfilling, one examining overload control in a streaming video server, and one comparing two different scheduling strategies for a distributed network service. The last example also demonstrates how consideration of robustness leads to better system design as we were able to devise a new and effective scheduling heuristic.
Darin England, Jon B. Weissman, Jayashree Sadagopan
HPDC1
2004 Costs and Benefits of Load Sharing in the Computational Grid
Darin England, Jon B. Weissman
JSSPP1
2003 Integrated scheduling: the best of both worlds
Jon B. Weissman, Lakshman Rao Abburi, Darin England
J. Parallel Distributed Comput.3