Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Katherine Demuth

dblp:21/9282 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
11ranked-venue papers
0as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-3884-8886ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 10 · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Information extraction and text analysis · 30% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 26% Speech recognition and synthesis · 14%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference
bayesian model selection
0.212014
Modelling function words improves unsupervised word segmentation · ACL (1) 2014
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › word segmentation
unsupervised word segmentation
0.212014
Modelling function words improves unsupervised word segmentation · ACL (1) 2014
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
word segmentation
0.212013
A joint model of word segmentation and phonological variation for English word-final /t/-deletion · ACL (1) 2013
Computer vision › Vision and language
grounded language learning
0.112012
Exploiting Social Information in Grounded Language Learning via Grammatical Reduction · ACL (1) 2012
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference
bayesian nonparametric model
0.112010
Synergies in learning words and their referents · NIPS 2010
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
language acquisition
0.112010
Synergies in learning words and their referents · NIPS 2010
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
multimodal representation learning
0.012012
Exploiting Social Information in Grounded Language Learning via Grammatical Reduction · ACL (1) 2012

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

bayesian inference · 0.2adaptor grammars · 0.2joint modeling · 0.2grammatical reduction · 0.1topic model · 0.1bayesian nonparametric modeling · 0.1PCFG · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 How do both phonological and syntactic complexity influence speech planning?
Ivan Yuen, Katherine Demuth, Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel
INTERSPEECH2
2025 A language-agnostic model of child language acquisition
abstract
This work reimplements a recent semantic bootstrapping child language acquisition (CLA) model, which was originally designed for English, and trains it to learn a new language: Hebrew. The model learns from pairs of utterances and logical forms as meaning representations, and acquires both syntax and word meanings simultaneously. The results show that the model mostly transfers to Hebrew, but that a number of factors, including the richer morphology in Hebrew, makes the learning slower and less robust. This suggests that a clear direction for future work is to enable the model to leverage the similarities between different word forms.
Louis Mahon, Omri Abend, Uri Berger, Katherine Demuth, Mark Johnson 0001, Mark Steedman
Comput. Speech Lang.4
2023 Effects of hearing loss and audio-visual cues on children's speech processing speed
Rebecca Holt, Laurence Bruggeman, Katherine Demuth
Speech Commun.3
2021 AusKidTalk: An Auditory-Visual Corpus of 3- to 12-Year-Old Australian Children's Speech
abstract
Here we present AusKidTalk [1], an audio-visual (AV) corpus of Australian children’s speech collected to facilitate the development of speech based technological solutions for children. It builds upon the technology and expertise developed through the collection of an earlier corpus of Australian adult speech, AusTalk [2,3]. This multi-site initiative was established to remedy the dire shortage of children’s speech corpora in Australia and around the world that are sufficiently sized to train accurate automated speech processing tools for children. We are collecting ~600 hours of speech from children aged 3–12 years that includes single word and sentence productions as well as narrative and emotional speech. In this paper, we discuss the key requirements for AusKidTalk and how we designed the recording setup and protocol to meet them. We also discuss key findings from our feasibility study of the recording protocol, recording tools, and user interface.
Beena Ahmed, Kirrie J. Ballard, Denis Burnham, Tharmakulasingam Sirojan, Hadi Mehmood, Dominique Estival, Elise Baker, Felicity Cox, Joanne Arciuli, Titia Benders, Katherine Demuth, Barbara Kelly, Chloé Diskin-Holdaway, Mostafa Shahin, Vidhyasaharan Sethu, Julien Epps, Chwee Beng Lee, Eliathamby Ambikairajah
Interspeech11
2017 Vowels in the Barunga Variety of North Australian Kriol
Caroline Jones, Katherine Demuth, Andre Almeida
INTERSPEECH2
2014 Modelling function words improves unsupervised word segmentation
abstract
Inspired by experimental psychological findings suggesting that function words play a special role in word learning, we make a simple modification to an Adaptor Grammar based Bayesian word segmentation model to allow it to learn sequences of monosyllabic "function words" at the beginnings and endings of collocations of (possibly multi-syllabic) words.This modification improves unsupervised word segmentation on the standard Bernstein-Ratner (1987) corpus of child-directed English by more than 4% token f-score compared to a model identical except that it does not special-case "function words", setting a new state-of-the-art of 92.4% token f-score.Our function word model assumes that function words appear at the left periphery, and while this is true of languages such as English, it is not true universally.We show that a learner can use Bayesian model selection to determine the location of function words in their language, even though the input to the model only consists of unsegmented sequences of phones.Thus our computational models support the hypothesis that function words play a special role in word learning.
Mark Johnson 0001, Anne Christophe, Emmanuel Dupoux, Katherine Demuth
ACL (1)4
2013 A joint model of word segmentation and phonological variation for English word-final /t/-deletion
Benjamin Börschinger, Mark Johnson 0001, Katherine Demuth
ACL (1)3
2012 Exploiting Social Information in Grounded Language Learning via Grammatical Reduction
Mark Johnson 0001, Katherine Demuth, Michael C. Frank
ACL (1)2
2012 Studying the Effect of Input Size for Bayesian Word Segmentation on the Providence Corpus
Benjamin Börschinger, Katherine Demuth, Mark Johnson 0001
COLING2
2010 Unsupervised phonemic Chinese word segmentation using Adaptor Grammars
Mark Johnson 0001, Katherine Demuth
COLING2
2010 Synergies in learning words and their referents
abstract
This paper presents Bayesian non-parametric models that simultaneously learn to segment words from phoneme strings and learn the referents of some of those words, and shows that there is a synergistic interaction in the acquisition of these two kinds of linguistic information. The models themselves are novel kinds of Adaptor Grammars that are an extension of an embedding of topic models into PCFGs. These models simultaneously segment phoneme sequences into words and learn the relationship between non-linguistic objects to the words that refer to them. We show (i) that modelling inter-word dependencies not only improves the accuracy of the word segmentation but also of word-object relationships, and (ii) that a model that simultaneously learns word-object relationships and word segmentation segments more accurately than one that just learns word segmentation on its own. We argue that these results support an interactive view of language acquisition that can take advantage of synergies such as these.
Mark Johnson 0001, Katherine Demuth, Michael C. Frank, Bevan K. Jones
NIPS2