Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

T. Etame

dblp:21/9655 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Audio and music processing · 33% Multimedia systems and quality of experience · 33% Visualization and visual analytics · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Visualization and visual analytics › dimensionality reduction
multidimensional scaling
0.112011
Towards a New Reference Impairment System in the Subjective Evaluation of Speech Codecs · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 2011
Audio and music processing
speech quality assessment
0.112011
Towards a New Reference Impairment System in the Subjective Evaluation of Speech Codecs · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 2011
Multimedia systems and quality of experience
subjective quality assessment
0.112011
Towards a New Reference Impairment System in the Subjective Evaluation of Speech Codecs · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 2011

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

verbalization task · 0.1multidimensional scaling · 0.1dissimilarity tests · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2011 Towards a New Reference Impairment System in the Subjective Evaluation of Speech Codecs
abstract
For subjective assessment of speech quality in codecs, a reference impairment system is required to introduce controlled degradations to calibrate subjective evaluation. A reference system provides a convenient means for making meaningful comparisons between subjective test results across laboratories and can be viewed as a scale on which mean opinion scores are projected, this scale being supposed to cover the whole range of quality. Nowadays, standardized anchor systems do not fit any more the degradations brought by the present codecs. This paper aims at offering new reference signals simulating the defaults of codecs currently used on telecommunication networks. Twenty wideband codecs are compared through dissimilarity tests. A multidimensional scaling technique allows us to define a four-dimensional perceptive space that appears stable for male and female talkers. A verbalization task suggests qualifying the degradations perceived by the listeners with the following attributes: muffle, background noise, noise on speech, and hiss, each conveyed by one dimension. These dimensions are correlated with objective measures such as spectral centroid, energy in the silent part in the high frequency sub-band, ratio of brightness between deterministic part and residual part of the signal and spectral correlation coefficient. New reference signals are produced and a phase of validation suggests a perceptive space quite coherent with the original one.
T. Etame, Régine Le Bouquin-Jeannès, Catherine Quinquis, Lætitia Gros, Gérard Faucon
IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process.1