EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Frederick Callaway
dblp:210/0837 · also Fred Callaway
· DBLP profile ↗
18ranked-venue papers
6as first author
9since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-7687-5987ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 17 · 5 first-author · 9 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 16 · 5 first-author · 7 since 2021
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Decompose, Deduce, and Dispose: A Memory-Limited Metacognitive Model of Human Problem Solving
Samuel J. Cheyette, Tony Chen 0003, Matthias Hofer 0002, Frederick Callaway, Neil Bramley, Josh Tenenbaum |
CogSci | 4 |
| 2025 | A Variational Neural Network Model of Resource-Rational Reward Encoding in Human Planning
Zhuojun Ying, Frederick Callaway, Roy Fox, Anastasia Kiyonaga, Marcelo G. Mattar |
CogSci | 2 |
| 2025 | Counterfactual error-monitoring in human planning
Doris Yu, Frederick Callaway, Marcelo G. Mattar |
CogSci | 2 |
| 2024 | Revealing human planning strategies with eye-tracking
Frederick Callaway, Marcelo G. Mattar |
CogSci | 1 |
| 2024 | Resource-Rational Encoding of Reward Information in Planning
Zhuojun Ying, Frederick Callaway, Anastasia Kiyonaga, Marcelo G. Mattar |
CogSci | 2 |
| 2023 | People seek easily interpretable information
Samuel J. Cheyette, Frederick Callaway, Neil Bramley, Jonathan D. Nelson, Josh Tenenbaum |
CogSci | 2 |
| 2023 | Humans decompose tasks by trading off utility and computational costabstractHuman behavior emerges from planning over elaborate decompositions of tasks into goals, subgoals, and low-level actions. How are these decompositions created and used? Here, we propose and evaluate a normative framework for task decomposition based on the simple idea that people decompose tasks to reduce the overall cost of planning while maintaining task performance. Analyzing 11,117 distinct graph-structured planning tasks, we find that our framework justifies several existing heuristics for task decomposition and makes predictions that can be distinguished from two alternative normative accounts. We report a behavioral study of task decomposition (N = 806) that uses 30 randomly sampled graphs, a larger and more diverse set than that of any previous behavioral study on this topic. We find that human responses are more consistent with our framework for task decomposition than alternative normative accounts and are most consistent with a heuristic-betweenness centrality-that is justified by our approach. Taken together, our results suggest the computational cost of planning is a key principle guiding the intelligent structuring of goal-directed behavior. Carlos G. Correa, Mark K. Ho, Frederick Callaway, Nathaniel D. Daw, Thomas L. Griffiths 0001 |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 3 |
| 2021 | Developmental Change in What Elicits Curiosity
Emily Liquin, Frederick Callaway, Tania Lombrozo |
CogSci | 2 |
| 2021 | Fixation patterns in simple choice reflect optimal information samplingabstractSimple choices (e.g., eating an apple vs. an orange) are made by integrating noisy evidence that is sampled over time and influenced by visual attention; as a result, fluctuations in visual attention can affect choices. But what determines what is fixated and when? To address this question, we model the decision process for simple choice as an information sampling problem, and approximate the optimal sampling policy. We find that it is optimal to sample from options whose value estimates are both high and uncertain. Furthermore, the optimal policy provides a reasonable account of fixations and choices in binary and trinary simple choice, as well as the differences between the two cases. Overall, the results show that the fixation process during simple choice is influenced dynamically by the value estimates computed during the decision process, in a manner consistent with optimal information sampling. Frederick Callaway, Antonio Rangel, Thomas L. Griffiths 0001 |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 1 |
| 2020 | Optimal nudging
Frederick Callaway, Mathew D. Hardy, Thomas L. Griffiths 0001 |
CogSci | 1 |
| 2020 | Resource-rational Task Decomposition to Minimize Planning Costs
Carlos G. Correa, Mark K. Ho, Frederick Callaway, Thomas L. Griffiths 0001 |
CogSci | 3 |
| 2020 | Leveraging Machine Learning to Automatically Derive Robust Planning Strategies from Biased Models of the Environment
Anirudha Kemtur, Yash Raj Jain, Aashay Mehta, Frederick Callaway, Saksham Consul, Jugoslav Stojcheski, Falk Lieder |
CogSci | 4 |
| 2020 | Quantifying Curiosity: A Formal Approach to Dissociating Causes of Curiosity
Emily Liquin, Frederick Callaway, Tania Lombrozo |
CogSci | 2 |
| 2019 | Compositional subgoal representations
Carlos G. Correa, Frederick Callaway, Mark K. Ho, Thomas L. Griffiths 0001 |
CogSci | 2 |
| 2019 | Measuring how people learn how to plan
Yash Raj Jain, Frederick Callaway, Falk Lieder |
CogSci | 2 |
| 2018 | A resource-rational analysis of human planning
Frederick Callaway, Falk Lieder, Priyam Das, Sayan Gul, Paul M. Krueger, Thomas L. Griffiths 0001 |
CogSci | 1 |
| 2018 | Learning to select computations
Frederick Callaway, Sayan Gul, Paul M. Krueger, Thomas L. Griffiths 0001, Falk Lieder |
UAI | 1 |
| 2017 | Discovering simple heuristics from mental simulation
Frederick Callaway, Jessica B. Hamrick, Thomas L. Griffiths 0001 |
CogSci | 1 |